Experimental Design: Glider with a boat propeller?

Rustybucket777

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
5 May 2025
Messages
3
Reaction score
4
I had a stupid idea a week ago and can’t figure out if it could work or if it's a bust...

I saw videos of Asian “long tail” speed boats on the internet. Long slender planing craft with an equally long propeller shaft sticking out of the back. These things fly, and sometimes literally. If the boat pitches too high, the hull becomes a wing and it will get lifted clean out of the water.

thai-racing-1-SPS-Swamp-Runner.jpg

The idea is: what if it was meant to be airborne? What if it had wings and it’s normal operating mode was to be lifted a few feet out of the water, with only a surface-piercing propeller and maybe a rudder still in the water? Kind of like a seaplane constantly about to take off, in mild ground effect the whole time. Yes I realize I'm just describing a GEV or Ekranoplan, but the idea isn't to optimize for maximum ground effect. Rather, the idea is to get the hull out of the water but keep the propulsion in the water.

IMG_7929.jpg

Some design constraints: Assume an infinite and smooth lake surface. Assume unlimited power-to-weight. And assume no ambient wind.

All the risks of near-ground flight aside, is it theoretically possible? Let's assume it has the necessary dihedral angle to roll a small amount without touching the ground. Could it achieve dynamic stability to a certain degree? The typical stability modes are difficult to analyze with this craft because of the different fluids on the wing vs the tail. What control surfaces would be necessary to achieve reasonably stable flight at constant speed?

And of course, what’s the one big thing I’m missing that makes this whole idea stupid? : D
 
maybe for same lift at this speed(within water propeller limit),
"wing" designed in water work much better than which designed in air?
as human powered aircraft can only barely fly,but human powered hydrofoil much better
 
maybe for same lift at this speed(within water propeller limit),
"wing" designed in water work much better than which designed in air?
as human powered aircraft can only barely fly,but human powered hydrofoil much better
Absolutely! There’s a reason human-powered boats always use hydrofoils instead of airfoils. I am forcing a bad design to happen but I’m still pursuing it because I think it would “look” cool. Right now I’m designing a RC scale model and this project will probably stop there. If it flies at all for more than a second I would be happy. Probably very sensitive to power input and environmental conditions. So impractical. This is essentially an art project as much as an engineering project.
 
I think you've essentially reinvented the powered surfboard/efoil.
 
The ghost of Donald Campbell would like a word...

Also, wasn't there real-recent footage of a catamaran speed-boat 'looping the loop' ?
Due better build quality, the crew escaped the 'spin cycle' with their lives...
 
I had a stupid idea a week ago and can’t figure out if it could work or if it's a bust...

I saw videos of Asian “long tail” speed boats on the internet. Long slender planing craft with an equally long propeller shaft sticking out of the back. These things fly, and sometimes literally. If the boat pitches too high, the hull becomes a wing and it will get lifted clean out of the water.

View attachment 768967

The idea is: what if it was meant to be airborne? What if it had wings and it’s normal operating mode was to be lifted a few feet out of the water, with only a surface-piercing propeller and maybe a rudder still in the water? Kind of like a seaplane constantly about to take off, in mild ground effect the whole time. Yes I realize I'm just describing a GEV or Ekranoplan, but the idea isn't to optimize for maximum ground effect. Rather, the idea is to get the hull out of the water but keep the propulsion in the water.

View attachment 768968

Some design constraints: Assume an infinite and smooth lake surface. Assume unlimited power-to-weight. And assume no ambient wind.

All the risks of near-ground flight aside, is it theoretically possible? Let's assume it has the necessary dihedral angle to roll a small amount without touching the ground. Could it achieve dynamic stability to a certain degree? The typical stability modes are difficult to analyze with this craft because of the different fluids on the wing vs the tail. What control surfaces would be necessary to achieve reasonably stable flight at constant speed?

And of course, what’s the one big thing I’m missing that makes this whole idea stupid? : D

This isn't exactly a new idea. Hydrofoil has been around for a very long time.
It's been used for water human powered bikes.
As for taking flight look up Seaglider.
The Seaglider uses Hydrofoil to lift it up ;)

For human powered solution you will have to combine it with human powered aircraft.
This would be your minimum size / structure design. Frankly, I think you need more power and heavier structure to deal with the forces waves excert on the hull. So realistically, you can't get around using a motor imho.
 
View: https://youtu.be/ZlYBFZ2eQPQ?si=ziu9NSlU8hxM2zyA


I guess this problem is being optimized for different purposes all the time. Perhaps, rather than exploring the whole theoretical envelope of configurations you should constrain your aims somewhat while also relaxing the problem and work toward a solution from there.

Your sketch indicates an almost glider-like aspect ratio for the airborne part, necessarily resulting in a much more leisurely mode of dynamics than a river racing speedboat. While for some purposes breaking away from ground effect (stubby fenced wings) is probably suboptimal you might still discover uses for a slightly wider range of flight regimes. Having fun is an absolutely valid pursuit among others. Might be appealing, most recreational motorized water activities are loud and induce bodily discomfort and stress up to an almost violent extent.

The abundance of hydrofoils compared to ground effect vehicles points to the former solution being more workable, or at least having been more workable. Even very cheap ready to fly RC airplanes have electronic stabilizers so I'm reasonably sure something can be made to work along the lines of your sketch as well. There might be avenues to optimize the dynamic balance of the vehicle from there. I guess in our wide World a handful of people at any one time dabble with this, like "rctestflight" below (a result of a simple web search) but at least in the below video his methodology seems to be quite all over the place.

View: https://youtu.be/tVsDB8p9c44?si=GwArANZZ2ts0_N-3
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom