Early Impression for Boeing WS-110A Proposal

Looking for an old AWST article to scan, I found another photocopy I took some times ago in which are depicted, w/o additional information, a couple of models of what seem a single Boeing-Wichita design. One is a tunnel model, the other one is a 1:10 model used for live drop tests. Could be: 1) a light-bomber/fighter-bomber/strike aircraft, either land or ship-based; b) a VTOL tactical aircraft (I seem to divine vertical jet inlets in the central fuselage. Anyone has some more clues ? Date is circa 1960 (could be little earlier).
Thanx in advance
 

Attachments

  • Boeing project.gif
    Boeing project.gif
    566.5 KB · Views: 1,315
Was Boeing by chance involved with BAC on the TSR.2? The shape of the model looks quite a bit like a TSR.2
 
Hesham, I have the exact same pictures under "Model 721". Which is correct?
 
Valkyrie by Jenkins & Landis:

Page 22; with that pictures.

During March 1956 Boeing began investigating the Model 724-13, and this is the model that is usually -incorrectly- shown as the Boeing entry in the competition
Click to expand...

The floating tips were numbered Model 724-1001
 
My dear Skybolt,

your picture looks like the picture from Flightglobal for
Boeing WS-110A bomber in wind tunnel.

http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1958/1958%20-%200042.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Boeing WS-110.JPG
    Boeing WS-110.JPG
    17.8 KB · Views: 198
As my dear Stargazer told us;

Model 713 --- WS-110A program (probably plain WS-110 in fact)
Click to expand...

May be this aircraft in the beginning of that topic,was the Boeing Model 713.
 

Attachments

  • Boeing WS-110A.JPG
    Boeing WS-110A.JPG
    39.3 KB · Views: 152
hesham said:
Hi,

also early Boeing design,the Model-724.

http://www.xb70.free.fr/mono/Texte/avant-projet/avant-projet.htm
Click to expand...

That link doesn't work for me, but this one does:

http://www.xb70.free.fr/mono/Texte/avant-projet/avant-projet.php

Question...are those jettisonable, disposable fuel tanks that take some of the wing with them, recoverable winged fuel tanks (if so, recoverable where and by whom) or...?
 
Hi,

I think it was Boeing Model-721,which was submitted to WS-302A to compete
the Martin XB-68,Model-721 was derivative of Model-712,and for Model-712
configuration,it was a slim high-wing design with tapered swept wing and
all-moving tail,used two Wright J67-W-1 engines mounted in nacelles that
were placed adjacent to the rear fuselage and the middle fuselage was area
ruled to accommodate this feature as in Mr. Tony Butler's book; American
Secret Projects: Fighters and Interceptors.
 

Attachments

  • Boeing WS-110A.JPG
    Boeing WS-110A.JPG
    39.3 KB · Views: 175
When the Boeing 724 model was unveiled at a contractor presentation, SAC commander General Curtis LeMay famously said something like, "This isn't an airplane, it's a three-ship formation!" Does anybody know the exact wording of the quote and possibly a source? I remember reading this in a book, but cannot remember which one ... Thank you.

Attached is the model in question, now in storage at the Boeing archive in Seattle.
 

Attachments

  • Boeing Model 724-15:WS-110A.jpg
    Boeing Model 724-15:WS-110A.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 310
circle-5 said:
When the Boeing 724 model was unveiled at a contractor presentation, SAC commander General Curtis LeMay famously said something like, "This isn't an airplane, it's a three-ship formation!" Does anybody know the exact wording of the quote and possibly a source? I remember reading this in a book, but cannot remember which one ... Thank you.

Attached is the model in question, now in storage at the Boeing archive in Seattle.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure its in Landis and Jenkins' Valkyrie book, but I'm away from my books at present.
 
In my Valkyrie books the exact Gen. Lemay quote is: "Back to the drawing boards. This isn't an airplane, it's a three-ship formation." -SP
 
Cool plane (planes?). It would be interesting to rummage through the 1950s for the then-impractical ideas that could be made to work today.
 
Steve Pace said:
In my Valkyrie books the exact Gen. Lemay quote is: "Back to the drawing boards. This isn't an airplane, it's a three-ship formation." -SP
Click to expand...

Thank you Steve, for the answer to my question!
 

Attachments

  • Configuration 724-16 model was part of Boeing’s 1957 submission for the Mach 3, long-range, su...jpg
    Configuration 724-16 model was part of Boeing’s 1957 submission for the Mach 3, long-range, su...jpg
    269.3 KB · Views: 156
Last edited by a moderator:
Was it meant to take-off in this configuration?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • boeing model 725-87 model.jpg
    boeing model 725-87 model.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 74
  • 96bbfe2c61bcd0158b77ef1e9395d30b.jpg
    96bbfe2c61bcd0158b77ef1e9395d30b.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 72
  • 3.png
    3.png
    190.5 KB · Views: 78
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Model 725-90 drawing by Boeing.jpg
    Model 725-90 drawing by Boeing.jpg
    286 KB · Views: 87
  • v5n6anim2.jpg
    v5n6anim2.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 92
  • v5n6anim2.gif
    v5n6anim2.gif
    135 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
Hi!
blogozine.blog.hu

A North American XB-70 Valkyrie és története, 3. rész

Egy koncepcióváltást követően megszületik a WS-110A kiírás győztese, amihez egy addig sosem használt elvet is kiaknáz az NAA. A követelmények és nyertes terv csiszolgatása közben a hajtóművek és hajtóanyagok fejlesztése is folyik. A sorozat első része ITT olvasható, míg az előző ITT. A légierő…
blogozine.blog.hu blogozine.blog.hu
 

Attachments

  • b_724-21.png
    b_724-21.png
    922.9 KB · Views: 67
  • b_725-1.png
    b_725-1.png
    366.5 KB · Views: 63
  • b_725-91.png
    b_725-91.png
    834.7 KB · Views: 61
  • b_725-101.png
    b_725-101.png
    460.7 KB · Views: 63
  • b_725-110.png
    b_725-110.png
    349.8 KB · Views: 63
  • b_e804-1.png
    b_e804-1.png
    735 KB · Views: 64
  • boeing_ws-110a.png
    boeing_ws-110a.png
    972.6 KB · Views: 69
  • 804-1.png
    804-1.png
    900.9 KB · Views: 69
  • 804-4.png
    804-4.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 75
  • 804-4_rtg.png
    804-4_rtg.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 72
  • 804r1.jpg
    804r1.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 69
  • 804r2.jpg
    804r2.jpg
    53.1 KB · Views: 66
  • scale_2400.jpg
    scale_2400.jpg
    128.3 KB · Views: 79

Attachments

  • s-l400.jpg
    s-l400.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 51

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom