• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Convair GEBO B-36 Delta Parasite bomber

jzichek

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
271
Reaction score
52
Website
www.patreon.com
Check out this article at RetroMechanix.com presenting Convair Generalized Supersonic Bomber (GEBO) II Studies of 1951:



The GEBO II was a carrier-parasite composite aircraft using a B-36 carrier airplane and a partially expendable supersonic bomber as the parasite; the concept would be eventually abandoned in favor of a more conventional design which became the B-58 Hustler. The article reproduces excerpts of the originals reports, along with 63 drawings and illustrations of the various configurations studied.

-Jared
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
466
Among the documents recently declassified by the U.S. Air Force is a Briefing on Supersonic Intercontinental Bombing which describes a project to connect three B-36 bombers by the wingtip and have them carry each a small supersonic bomber. The purpose of this configuration was to obtain a weapons system "capable of delivering an atomic bomb on the Russian industrial area within a radius of 4500 nautical miles from bases within the continental United States in a non-stop flight." (more details in this fascinating document).

The small supersonic bomber echoes the "Super Hustler" series of designs but is unlike any configuration I've seen. Any idea where exactly it fits in the design chronology?
 

Attachments

  • exhibitB.jpg
    exhibitB.jpg
    285.7 KB · Views: 1,438
  • exhibitC.jpg
    exhibitC.jpg
    211.9 KB · Views: 1,388

LowObservable

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,209
Reaction score
142
I'd missed the B-36 troika first time around. That must rank in the Top 5 Batsh** Crazy Projects Ever Formally Briefed. Can you imagine presenting that to LeMay?
 

bigvlada

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
369
Reaction score
20
How would this thing land? Or take off? Using three parallel runways? ;D
 

taildragger

You can count on me - I won a contest
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
311
Reaction score
180
I think the plan was that they would take off separately and join up in flight. This had been accomplished between F-84s and B-29s (project Tom-Tom and wingtip refueling trials) but might have been more of a challenge with a trio of B-36's.
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,551
Reaction score
1,568
LowObservable said:
I'd missed the B-36 troika first time around. That must rank in the Top 5 Batsh** Crazy Projects Ever Formally Briefed. Can you imagine presenting that to LeMay?

Pluto still takes first prize. Okay, well, maybe second, behind militarized Orions.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,915
Reaction score
257
Can you imagine presenting that to LeMay?
And we all know how LeMay felt about three-ship formations...


cheers,
Robin.
 

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
651
Reaction score
284
Pem Tech said:
So, what was the point of connecting the aircraft at the wingtips?
It looks like each B-36 had a bomber on board, so it couldn't have been to transport fuel...
Increasing the effective aspect ratio of the B-36s wings and thus extending the range.
 

taildragger

You can count on me - I won a contest
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
311
Reaction score
180
sienar said:
Pem Tech said:
So, what was the point of connecting the aircraft at the wingtips?
It looks like each B-36 had a bomber on board, so it couldn't have been to transport fuel...
Increasing the effective aspect ratio of the B-36s wings and thus extending the range.


There was probably also a staging aspect to the concept, where the bomber component would be topped off from the fuel tank components before they detached and began their return trip.
 
Top