Sorry, I have zero info on the picture. It was forwarded to me to try to get info on it...but I am a C-130 guy. I know very little about the C-5AeroFranz said:Interesting picture. Did it say somewhere explicitly that this was a C-5 derivative?
Besides the changes made to the wing, the tail looks obviously wrong. Looks like it's a variable incidence tail too (all moving).
Well, I guess that if you were going for high lift it would be a good idea to raise the horizontal stabilizer above the downwash off the wing.
But yeah, the engine position and type of flaps point to an externally blown flap configuration, with slats on top of that. Somebody was trying hard to get STOL. Do you know when this picture was taken?
AeroFranz said:Besides the changes made to the wing, the tail looks obviously wrong. Looks like it's a variable incidence tail too (all moving).
Well, I guess that if you were going for high lift it would be a good idea to raise the horizontal stabilizer above the downwash off the wing.
Thank you!!Apophenia said:NASA did identify this model as a "C-5" but I think that was only a matter of convience. The same "C-5" model was used in the early '70s for 'free-flight' windtunnel test for NASA upper surface blowing development.
The tail was enlarged and moved forward to avoid the wake of new "siamese" USB nacelles on top of the wings.
Pity the site is 'under review' at the moment.More pics of the VSTOL Galaxy here:
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-70-7127.jpg
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-70-7128.jpg
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-70-7129.jpg
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-70-7130.jpg
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:L-70-7131.jpg