Bellanca Airplane Projects

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
32,495
Reaction score
11,579
Hi,

from this great site,here is some Bellanca Projects;

Bellanca six seat,

Bellanca Model 27-86 Two Seater Fighter,

Bellanca Three-Seater Super Fighter,

Bellanca Model 26-100B, Single Seat Fighter Bomber,

Bellanca Model 27-86 Two Seater Fighter,

Bellanca Projects, 1927;

Bellanca New Designs, 1938
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    717.3 KB · Views: 131
  • 2.png
    2.png
    663.5 KB · Views: 88
  • 1927.png
    1927.png
    415.9 KB · Views: 69
  • 1-38.png
    1-38.png
    403.1 KB · Views: 61
  • 2-38.png
    2-38.png
    495.5 KB · Views: 58
  • 3-38.png
    3-38.png
    405.7 KB · Views: 63
  • 4-38.png
    4-38.png
    400.8 KB · Views: 68
  • 5-38.png
    5-38.png
    414.8 KB · Views: 70
  • 6-38.png
    6-38.png
    364.4 KB · Views: 73
  • 7-38.png
    7-38.png
    417.2 KB · Views: 74

Attachments

  • biplane.png
    biplane.png
    245.7 KB · Views: 78
  • 2.png
    2.png
    479.4 KB · Views: 76
  • 2-2.png
    2-2.png
    470.4 KB · Views: 74
  • 3.png
    3.png
    286.2 KB · Views: 73

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    365 KB · Views: 56
  • 2.png
    2.png
    534.9 KB · Views: 56
  • 3.png
    3.png
    484.3 KB · Views: 52
  • 4.png
    4.png
    388.7 KB · Views: 50
  • 5.png
    5.png
    333.2 KB · Views: 46
  • 6.png
    6.png
    393.8 KB · Views: 45
  • 7.png
    7.png
    421.8 KB · Views: 44
  • 8.png
    8.png
    447.1 KB · Views: 44
  • 9.png
    9.png
    721.7 KB · Views: 44
  • 10.png
    10.png
    427.5 KB · Views: 44
And;

I am not sure about picture # 15,what was it ?.
 

Attachments

  • 11.png
    11.png
    396.5 KB · Views: 45
  • 12.png
    12.png
    363.9 KB · Views: 42
  • 13.png
    13.png
    473.8 KB · Views: 41
  • 14.png
    14.png
    598.8 KB · Views: 41
  • 15.png
    15.png
    938.3 KB · Views: 39
  • 16.png
    16.png
    735.8 KB · Views: 38
  • 17.png
    17.png
    435.3 KB · Views: 38
  • 18.png
    18.png
    411.5 KB · Views: 42
  • 19.png
    19.png
    433.8 KB · Views: 43
  • 20.png
    20.png
    409.6 KB · Views: 40
Finally.
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    449.5 KB · Views: 34
  • 22.png
    22.png
    570.7 KB · Views: 44

Attachments

  • Bellanca biplan hélice propulsive.png
    Bellanca biplan hélice propulsive.png
    433.8 KB · Views: 52
  • Bellanca monoplan hélice propulsive.png
    Bellanca monoplan hélice propulsive.png
    333.2 KB · Views: 54

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    912.4 KB · Views: 44
  • 2.png
    2.png
    389.3 KB · Views: 41
  • 3.png
    3.png
    581.8 KB · Views: 42
  • 4.png
    4.png
    550.7 KB · Views: 40
  • 5.png
    5.png
    431.9 KB · Views: 34
  • 6.png
    6.png
    524.8 KB · Views: 34
  • 7.png
    7.png
    633.4 KB · Views: 32
  • 8.png
    8.png
    506.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 9.png
    9.png
    580.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 10.png
    10.png
    617.4 KB · Views: 34
And;
 

Attachments

  • 11.png
    11.png
    503.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 12.png
    12.png
    871.7 KB · Views: 38
  • 13.png
    13.png
    575.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 14.png
    14.png
    817.1 KB · Views: 43
  • 15.png
    15.png
    477 KB · Views: 41
  • 16.png
    16.png
    734.5 KB · Views: 39
  • 17.png
    17.png
    663.1 KB · Views: 31
  • 18.png
    18.png
    438.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 19.png
    19.png
    457.1 KB · Views: 32
  • 20.png
    20.png
    432.9 KB · Views: 35
And;
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    585.6 KB · Views: 34
  • 22.png
    22.png
    291.3 KB · Views: 31
  • 23.png
    23.png
    527.1 KB · Views: 30
  • 24.png
    24.png
    542.2 KB · Views: 30
  • 25.png
    25.png
    504.7 KB · Views: 32
  • 26.png
    26.png
    603.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 27.png
    27.png
    546.8 KB · Views: 28
  • 28.png
    28.png
    686.3 KB · Views: 29
  • 29.png
    29.png
    765.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 30.png
    30.png
    649.2 KB · Views: 32
And;
 

Attachments

  • 31.png
    31.png
    658.1 KB · Views: 30
  • 32.png
    32.png
    589.5 KB · Views: 29
  • 33.png
    33.png
    963.6 KB · Views: 27
  • 34.png
    34.png
    747.2 KB · Views: 27
  • 35.png
    35.png
    425 KB · Views: 29
  • 36.png
    36.png
    510.4 KB · Views: 31
  • 37.png
    37.png
    857.8 KB · Views: 30
  • 38.png
    38.png
    788.3 KB · Views: 31
  • 39.png
    39.png
    613.5 KB · Views: 30
  • 40.png
    40.png
    409 KB · Views: 33
Finally,

this report contains some drawings from 1950s and anther drawings from 1936 and lower years,but a big surprise;

Model 27-240,a push-pull single seat airplane Project,maybe a fighter,looks like Dornier Do.335 ?!.
 

Attachments

  • 41.png
    41.png
    505.6 KB · Views: 30
  • 42.png
    42.png
    414.2 KB · Views: 35
  • 27-240.png
    27-240.png
    436.6 KB · Views: 40
  • 27-240 II.png
    27-240 II.png
    556.7 KB · Views: 40
  • 27-240 III.png
    27-240 III.png
    550 KB · Views: 45

Attachments

  • 0.png
    0.png
    662.5 KB · Views: 32
  • 1.png
    1.png
    537.3 KB · Views: 29
  • 2.png
    2.png
    521.2 KB · Views: 28
  • 3.png
    3.png
    495.5 KB · Views: 26
  • 4.png
    4.png
    435.6 KB · Views: 26
  • 5.png
    5.png
    546.3 KB · Views: 26
  • 6.png
    6.png
    572.1 KB · Views: 28
  • 7.png
    7.png
    446.5 KB · Views: 25
  • 8.png
    8.png
    416.8 KB · Views: 25
  • 9.png
    9.png
    907.5 KB · Views: 26
  • 10.png
    10.png
    818.8 KB · Views: 27
And
 

Attachments

  • 11.png
    11.png
    430.6 KB · Views: 25
  • 12.png
    12.png
    290.2 KB · Views: 23
  • 13.png
    13.png
    474.1 KB · Views: 24
  • 14.png
    14.png
    350.4 KB · Views: 26
  • 15.png
    15.png
    603.4 KB · Views: 26
  • 16.png
    16.png
    506.4 KB · Views: 25
  • 17.png
    17.png
    941.8 KB · Views: 23
  • 18.png
    18.png
    926.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 19.png
    19.png
    836.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 20.png
    20.png
    415.5 KB · Views: 23
And;
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    315.1 KB · Views: 23
  • 22.png
    22.png
    363.2 KB · Views: 24
  • 23.png
    23.png
    606.7 KB · Views: 24
  • 24.png
    24.png
    585 KB · Views: 23
  • 25.png
    25.png
    776.3 KB · Views: 21
  • 26.png
    26.png
    764.6 KB · Views: 22
  • 27.png
    27.png
    424.4 KB · Views: 24
  • 28.png
    28.png
    764.8 KB · Views: 24
  • 29.png
    29.png
    735.7 KB · Views: 24
  • 30.png
    30.png
    724.5 KB · Views: 27
Finally
 

Attachments

  • 31.png
    31.png
    581.5 KB · Views: 26
  • 32.png
    32.png
    457.4 KB · Views: 27
  • 33.png
    33.png
    422.1 KB · Views: 25
  • 34.png
    34.png
    524.1 KB · Views: 21
  • 35.png
    35.png
    523.5 KB · Views: 20
  • 36.png
    36.png
    452.6 KB · Views: 21
  • 37.png
    37.png
    468.4 KB · Views: 28
  • 38.png
    38.png
    539.9 KB · Views: 27
  • 39.png
    39.png
    387.1 KB · Views: 27
  • 40.png
    40.png
    543 KB · Views: 21
  • 41.png
    41.png
    501.5 KB · Views: 19
  • 42.png
    42.png
    513 KB · Views: 27
  • 43.png
    43.png
    702.1 KB · Views: 32
Hi,

here is a Bellanca-Higgins Models 22-34, 39-60, 35-48, 35-60, 36-60, 34-38 & 35-40 report,and I think all of them were a cargo airplanes ?.

 

Attachments

  • 22-40  I.png
    22-40 I.png
    583.2 KB · Views: 25
  • 22-40  II.png
    22-40 II.png
    617.4 KB · Views: 24
  • 22-40  III.png
    22-40 III.png
    390 KB · Views: 27
  • 22-40  IV.png
    22-40 IV.png
    386.7 KB · Views: 27
  • 22-40  V.png
    22-40 V.png
    408 KB · Views: 25
  • 22-40  VI.png
    22-40 VI.png
    562.4 KB · Views: 23
  • 22-40  VII.png
    22-40 VII.png
    575.5 KB · Views: 23
  • 35-60  I.png
    35-60 I.png
    456.2 KB · Views: 23
  • 35-60  II.png
    35-60 II.png
    416.6 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Hi,

here is un-completed drawing to Model 18-40 ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    550.9 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:
Not knowing that hesham had already dug into the files from the Giuseppe M. Bellanca archives, I did the same myself. Interestingly we didn't find the same things, so it's great to be complementary. Today I'd like to focus on five combat projects, all from the year 1939:

Model 17-110
A single-engine pursuit/interceptor, "designed by G. M. Bellanca as part of a proposal in a design competition" (more specifically Circular Proposal 39-770). The aircraft was also "submitted to U.S. Navy with motor inside back of the pilot", but the "Bell Airacobra took design".

17-110 (detail).jpg

Model 20-115
This was also a single-engine pursuit/interceptor for Circular Proposal 39-770, with turbo-supercharged engine.

20-115 (detail).jpg

Model 33-220 (29 June 1939)
Yet another interceptor pursuit proposal, this time in response to Army Circular Proposal No. 33-775, Army Type Specification C-615 and Army Specification R-1800-D. It was a single-seater powered by two Allison V-1710-33 engines and was in competition with the Lockheed P-38.

Model C 24-100-P (18 February 1939)
A full-cantilever low-wing monoplane using plastic bonded plywood in its construction, " a modern version of the Bellanca Model 28-90 low-wing military design (...) specifically designed for outstanding performance and rapid production", which could be "readily used as a single-seat fighter; two-seat fighter, observation, bomber or attack plane". Maximum speed was 325 mph, with an extremely fast rate of climb of 3,600 ft. per minute. It was powered with one Pratt & Whitney geared Twin-Wasp R-1830-S3C3-G engine


Model C 28-140 (20 September 1939)
A multi-purpose full-cantilever low-wing monoplane of plastic bonded plywood and welded steel structure, developed from the Flash series (and presumably the C 24-100-P project). The aircraft could be configured as a single-seat or two-place fighter, and also as a bomber. It was powered with one Wright GR-2600A-50 Double-Row Cyclone engine, developing 1400 hp at 2400 rpm up to 11,500 ft. The photo below looks rather convincing but could be a doctored photo as there is no evidence that the type was ever built.

C28-140 (detail).jpg
 

Attachments

  • C28-140.jpg
    C28-140.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 20
  • 20-115.jpg
    20-115.jpg
    60.6 KB · Views: 14
  • 17-110.jpg
    17-110.jpg
    45.9 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
While Bellanca was developing the ill-fated Model TES Tandem aircraft for the Chicago Daily News, he was also considering a double-decker passenger development. No doubt that the crash of "The Blue Streak" put an end to the project.

Double-decker transport 1.jpg

Double-decker transport 2.jpg
 
The notion that Bellanca doctored photos of existing types to introduce new designs was alluded to when we took a look at the Model 28-140 proposal. This is confirmed by a few other examples, such as this one, the Model 77-143 Seaplane Transport, a direct adaptation of the Model 77-140 Bomber, also using two 715 hp Wright R-1820-F3 Cyclone engines. The only actual differences resided in the square windows for the passenger cabin instead of the round ones, and the redesigned nose without the turret. There also seems to be a forward reinforcement added to the vertical tail.

Bellanca was confident enough that there was a market for the 18-place type that they actually advertised it in the December 1934 issue of Aero Digest as the "World's fastest twin engine seaplane". It was a "convertible" design, which means that it could be changed from landplane to seaplane. A three-view arrangement and a second doctored photo showing the landplane version were also published by Aero Digest (see attachments).

Seaplane Transport.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Bimotored Transport.jpg
    Bimotored Transport.jpg
    342.9 KB · Views: 25
  • Bi-Motor Seaplane Transport.jpg
    Bi-Motor Seaplane Transport.jpg
    642.4 KB · Views: 25
  • Seaplane Bomber.jpg
    Seaplane Bomber.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
As this forum seems to have massively shifted towards modern warfare, there is probably but a handful of individuals actually interested by old unbuilt designs by long defunct companies... Too bad, but I hope these individuals continue to enjoy the fruits of my research as much as I do... Tonight, I'm offering a totally obscure project from 1953: the Model 60 Utility Airplane, a sesquiplane which bore the unmistakable mark of Giuseppe Bellanca himself, and certainly built upon earlier pre-war types and projects, most notably the Airbus/Aircruiser family and their W-shaped "lift-struts" which were a Bellanca design trademark.

The Model 60 was studied in two distinct forms: a single-engined version designated Model 60-160, for which Bellanca envisaged the use of a 1,650 hp Armstrong-Siddeley Mamba (which he mistakenly refered to as a "De Haviland", wrong spelling included!), though a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp was also considered; and the multimotor version designated Model 60-120, which would have used either two 600 hp Pratt & Whitney R-1340-AN-2 Wasp engines, or three 400 hp Turbomeca Artouste, for a total of 1,200 hp in both cases (hence the "-120" suffix).

The all-metal Model 60 was seen by Bellanca as a possible replacement for the De Havilland DHC-3 Otter and its military versions (little did he know that the venerable bushplane would live on in operational service for another three decades!) Of course, the type was convertible to seaplane configuration, like all previous Bellanca transports. Provision was also made for external stores, pods, tanks or bombs depending on the customer's needs.

It's a pleasant surprise that the sole file about the Model 60 in the Bellanca archives contains drawings (the NASM usually removes them and asks researchers to inquire about them — most likely at a price). Unfortunately, these drawings were of pretty lousy quality, unsuitable for sharing "as is", which is partly the reason why I recreated them for inclusion here. The other reason is that I LOVE the Model 60 design, simple as that!

Bellanca 60.png
 

Attachments

  • Model 60 plan (single-engine) small.jpg
    Model 60 plan (single-engine) small.jpg
    256.6 KB · Views: 22
  • Model 60 plan (trimotor) small.jpg
    Model 60 plan (trimotor) small.jpg
    267.6 KB · Views: 24
As this forum seems to have massively shifted towards modern warfare, there is probably but a handful of individuals actually interested by old unbuilt designs by long defunct companies... Too bad, but I hope these individuals continue to enjoy the fruits of my research as much as I do...

We do indeed! And they don't get much wackier than these Bellancas that you are unearthing :D
 
We do indeed! And they don't get much wackier than these Bellancas that you are unearthing :D
As this forum seems to have massively shifted towards modern warfare, there is probably but a handful of individuals actually interested by old unbuilt designs by long defunct companies... Too bad, but I hope these individuals continue to enjoy the fruits of my research as much as I do... Tonight, I'm offering a totally obscure project from 1953: the Model 60 Utility Airplane, a sesquiplane which bore the unmistakable mark of Giuseppe Bellanca himself, and certainly built upon earlier pre-war types and projects, most notably the Airbus/Aircruiser family and their W-shaped "lift-struts" which were a Bellanca design trademark.

The Model 60 was studied in two distinct forms: a single-engined version designated Model 60-160, for which Bellanca envisaged the use of a 1,650 hp Armstrong-Siddeley Mamba (which he mistakenly refered to as a "De Haviland", wrong spelling included!), though a Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp was also considered; and the multimotor version designated Model 60-120, which would have used either two 600 hp Pratt & Whitney R-1340-AN-2 Wasp engines, or three 400 hp Turbomeca Artouste, for a total of 1,200 hp in both cases (hence the "-120" suffix).

The all-metal Model 60 was seen by Bellanca as a possible replacement for the De Havilland DHC-3 Otter and its military versions (little did he know that the venerable bushplane would live on in operational service for another three decades!) Of course, the type was convertible to seaplane configuration, like all previous Bellanca transports. Provision was also made for external stores, pods, tanks or bombs depending on the customer's needs.

It's a pleasant surprise that the sole file about the Model 60 in the Bellanca archives contains drawings (the NASM usually removes them and asks researchers to inquire about them — most likely at a price). Unfortunately, these drawings were of pretty lousy quality, unsuitable for sharing "as is", which is partly the reason why I recreated them for inclusion here. The other reason is that I LOVE the Model 60 design, simple as that!

View attachment 721367
 
Today, another obscure Bellanca project is taking on new life, and for once it's not a transport, but a fighter. True, the name "Bellanca" evokes transport aircraft of all kinds, but is not often associated with combat types. Not that the poor dude didn't try! I have listed about two dozen separate fighter/pursuit proposals from Bellanca for both the U.S. Navy and U.S. Army between the early 1920s and the early 1940s, and about 10 scout/bomber/torpedo projects of all sizes and configuration. So why did Bellanca's combat designs fail to interest the military? Probably because the competition had better proposals!

The Bellanca F-1 was conceived for the U.S. Navy as a single-engine, single-seat landplane fighter of metal construction. It could take off from the deck of an aircraft carrier without the aid of a catapult, and land there with an arrester gear. Contrary to many Bellanca designs, it was not designed for floats. It was 20 feet in length, and its wing had a 35-foot span for a surface of 175 sq. ft. Two fixed synchronized .30 caliber Browning guns were fitted in the fuselage. Noteworthy is the gull shape of the wings, which was not a Bellanca trademark at all. Power was to be provided by a 625 hp air-cooled engine, either a Pratt & Whitney R-1535 or a Wright R-1510.

If the later Bellanca system of naming aircraft had existed back then, the airplane would have been something like a "Model 17-62" (175 wingspan, 625 hp), but at the time Bellanca often named his projects by the customer's name, and since it was submitted to a "Class VF (1) Special" tender, it was logically designated the "F-1". What did "VF (1) Special" refer to, anyway? One is tempted to think of a racer, but the Navy was no longer involved in air racing at the time... In a letter from G. M. Bellanca to Capt. Frank Hawks, attached to the F-1 file, the aircraft designer confirmed that his company could "build for you a special high-speed airplane with a range of 2,000 miles. We guarantee for the above a cruising speed of 220 mph at two-thirds of the maximum horsepower of the engine" (This was, of course, only months after Hawks lost his prized Travel Air Mystery Ship in a crash). But Hawks was Army, not Navy! So even if Bellanca planned to produce a racer version for him, the F-1 proposal was different. And sure enough, it looked more like the racers of those days than any fighter in the Navy's inventory back then, so who knows? Perhaps the Navy was planning to go at it again?

In any case, the F-1 did not result in any order or prototype, either for Hawks or the Navy, but that doesn't mean it was insignificant in Bellanca's design history. On the contrary, it was his first "real" combat design (his "Three-Seater Super Fighter", a decade before, relied heavily on the D.H.4 as a basis, while his 1927 "Pusher Shipplane" never went very far). True, the F-1 was typical of that awkward transition period between the biplane era and the cantilever one, when monoplanes still had to be wire-braced (the Boeing P-26 Peashooter being the most iconic of all), but with its retractable gear and streamlined fuselage, it was Bellanca's first step in a series of designs that led to the Flash series.

Research & artwork © Stéphane Beaumort / CODACAM © 2024

F-1 plan (Beaumort).jpg
 

Attachments

  • F-1 fighter (small).jpg
    F-1 fighter (small).jpg
    336.7 KB · Views: 21
  • F-1 profile (small).jpg
    F-1 profile (small).jpg
    233.4 KB · Views: 21
Back
Top Bottom