Bell Aircraft's twin-boom fighter projects (XP-52, XP-59, etc.)

Jschmus

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
I don't post over here much, but I'm a little surprised that no one's mentioned the Bell XP-52. It was designed in response to the same R-40C RFP that was mentioned here earlier. It was a twin-boom configuration aircraft, with an inline engine driving a pusher prop and nose-mounted cannon armament. I've seen images various places online, but can't seem to lay hands on any of them at the moment.
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
found this beautiful painting on my HDD
 

Attachments

  • XP-52 paint.jpg
    XP-52 paint.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 1,005

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
More drawings at whatifmodelers:

http://www.whatifmodelers.com/forum//index.php?showtopic=17045&hl=xp-52
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
Hi Jschmus,

Your posts are welcome :)

XP-52 is an intriguing design. You're right that references can be found where it's described as an R-40C submission. But many others point in the other direction. In the list I published on post#2 from the present topic, which in my opinion comes from an authoritative source, the Model 16/XP-52 doesn't appear. According to it, Bell tendered its Model 13 to R-40C. Model 13 looked more like an enlarged P-39. In Bell Aircraft (Ed Putnam) I think there is a mistake on the description because the aircraft is associated to 1941 as "date of design". 1941 is too late for R-40C, however I think the real figure should be 1939 cited on Wings (August,1996 issue). BTW, there is an interesting windtunnel model with a different tail layout. I strongly recommend that magazine, which is still available, to all US pre-1945 fighter enthusiasts.

My personal opinion is Model 16 was designed a few months after Model 13, after Hap Arnold pushed for advanced lineal engine fighter (what latter was formaly requested as R-40C). While Model 13 was Bell's entry to R-40C, Model 16 could have been a parallel and more radical study based on Douglas DS-312A. May be Model 13 was to be R-40C "Phase One" entry and Model 16 would have been their entry for R-40C "Phase Two". As you probably know "Phase One" admitted designs based on existing technology while "Phase Two" demanded performance to the limits on totally new designs. The powerplant selected for Model 16 was the 1350 hp Continental IV-1430 which development was plagued with cooling problems that ended with its cancellation. Bell re-engined and thus re-designed its Model 16 into what the USAAC assigned the XP-59 designation. I don't know its Bell design number. XP-59 engine was the powerful and already in production Pratt&Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp radial (the same engine that powered F6F, Corsair or P-47 fighters). However, the USAAC cancelled the XP-59 in 1941 probably because it was found that it was not to be a revolutionary performer. By that time, late 1941, the USAAC selected Bell to concentrate all efforts into the production of US first operational jet fighter. Work on XP-59 was to judged a distraction of resources and thus terminated. However USAAC assigned the XP-59A designation to the jet to cover that program with the unrelated XP-59 work.

Regards,

Antonio
 

smurf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
549
Reaction score
52
Wings (August,1996 issue). BTW, there is an interesting windtunnel model with a different tail layout. I strongly recommend that magazine, which is still available,
Could you tell me where, please? I haven't thought of a search strategy that doesn't produce things like "drawings" in great quantity!
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
Ups, you're right smurf.

I've visited Wings web at:

http://www.airwingmedia.com/

and "paper" mags are no more available. It seems that they are scanning their back issues into CD/DVD support for sale. They have started from 2006 and counting down. The older "year" available is 1999 so you still have to wait to 1996.

I don't like very much that formula. I love the pdf but I rather prefer to buy single issues.
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,295
Reaction score
209
Uh, there is an AAHS members who is putting up for sale the entire collection on Wings/Airpower for 140 dollars.. anyone interested ?
 

smurf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
549
Reaction score
52
Thanks for the link Pometablava. I suppose you beat me to the paper collection offer!?!...
If you get it, let me know what duplicates you might then have that might interest me - the Aug 1996 especially.
I agree that the whole lot on disc is a bit pricey for what I might want, especially when the one I want isn't there yet!
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,882
Reaction score
1,544
pometablava said:
found this beautiful painting on my HDD

Thanks Pometablava! :-*

I did that image about four (?) years ago. It was my first attempt at rendering a 'secret project'. Attached is my second.
 

Attachments

  • xp-59b.jpg
    xp-59b.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 878

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
Thanks for the link Pometablava. I suppose you beat me to the paper collection offer!?!...

Well, actually not. First I have to wait for Skybolt's PM. 140$ for the full collection is quite a reasonable price for me but I'm almost sure that P&P will be astronomical if that collection would be shipped to Spain from the USA. So...I'm not very confident on seeing it on my home. :'(. Wings&Airpower was a first class publication with precisse and well researched contents and the rarest historical pics. I'll keep you updated anyway.


Apophenia,

I didn't knew you were the author of that XP-52 drawing, it's a pleasure to be in the forum with artists like you. Thanks again for that great XP-59 render.
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,882
Reaction score
1,544
Thanks Pometablava.

The Bell images were part of a site I was mounting of 'X' designs. I did the XP-39 (aft cockpit), XP-52, XP-59, XP-38 variations, etc. I had just started on bombers (XB-30) when my IP tanked ...
 

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,803
Reaction score
3,187
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
image8.jpg


Photos of the full scale mockup at the Cultish Blog of Imperialist Fascist Kool-Aid Doom.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
121
Bell model 19 - between XP-52(model 16) and XP-59(model 20)
according to D.R.Jenkins and T.R.Landis...

Experimental&Prototype U.S.Air Force Jet Fighters.SpecialtyPress 2008
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,649
Reaction score
508
Photos of the full scale mockup at the Cultish Blog of Imperialist Fascist Kool-Aid Doom.

Great pics, thanks a lot Scott!
 

SlickDriver

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
162
Reaction score
12
Thanks all!

Was wondering what the first designation would have looked like.
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
820
The Model 20 was also very similar to the Model 19, proposed to the US Navy (below). Both derived from the Model 16 project, or XP-52 (further below).
 

Attachments

  • image8.jpg
    image8.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 697
  • XP-52 paint.jpg
    XP-52 paint.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 675

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,882
Reaction score
1,544
Stargazer: xp-59.jpg was, of course, based on the photo of the windtunnel model and a 3-view. Alas, I mistook the access panels beneath the cockpit for additional glazing -- which might have been handy on the navalized Model 19 ;D

XP-52 paint.jpg was based on a 3-view from the same source (Angelucci's "The American Fighter", IIRC).
 

Justo Miranda

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
4,333
Website
www.amazon.com
Here 52 & 59

Some additional info from
-"Air International/March 1980
-"Air Force Legends" Number 208 by Steve Pace
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    258.2 KB · Views: 209
  • Escanear.jpg
    Escanear.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 396
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    121.9 KB · Views: 643
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    132.2 KB · Views: 608

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
820
Excellent! Thanks for sharing. What's the source for these? Never saw them before!
 

archipeppe

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
1,933
Reaction score
1,018
Justo Miranda said:
Unknown source

It seems to be simply a P-39 fuselage and (perhaps) wings coupled with two jet engines "a la Meteor" more than the Su-9/11 that obviously shows the influence of German me-262.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,445
Reaction score
6,103
Hi,

from the book; American Fighters since 1917 to the Present.
 

Attachments

  • XP-59   1.jpg
    XP-59 1.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 193
  • XP-59   2.jpg
    XP-59 2.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 200
  • XP-59   3.jpg
    XP-59 3.jpg
    23.1 KB · Views: 304

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,205
Hi! 59?
 

Attachments

  • image4.jpg
    image4.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 171
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    121.9 KB · Views: 188

Vladimir

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
321
Reaction score
20
Hi,
early wind tunnel model
 

Attachments

  • 300px-Bell_XP-59_wind_tunnel_model_060913-F-1234P-012.jpg
    300px-Bell_XP-59_wind_tunnel_model_060913-F-1234P-012.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 102

Vladimir

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
321
Reaction score
20
and another one
 

Attachments

  • image3.jpg
    image3.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 116

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
820
blackkite said:

Not quite. As the first picture's reference number suggests, this is the Navy's Model 22, a competitor of the Grumman F7F.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,205
Skyblazer said:
blackkite said:

Not quite. As the first picture's reference number suggests, this is the Navy's Model 22, a competitor of the Grumman F7F.
Almost same design?
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,205
XP-52 model, etc. 52 and 59 were also almost jet fighter.
XP-52's engine was Continental XIV-1430-5 12-cylinder, liquid-cooled, inverted V type.
XP-52 engine cooling system is hard to understand,too. I can't find any radiator cooling air outlet. Same as post war SNCASO S.O.8000?
Perhaps radiator cooling air inlet is located at the nose of the aircraft. ;D
 

Attachments

  • DSC01857.jpg
    DSC01857.jpg
    207.5 KB · Views: 125
  • 800px-Continental_I-1430.jpg
    800px-Continental_I-1430.jpg
    90.4 KB · Views: 402
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    132.2 KB · Views: 453
  • 5802939513_2a0b421ea7_z.jpg
    5802939513_2a0b421ea7_z.jpg
    169 KB · Views: 459
  • 2015-10-07_0908.jpg
    2015-10-07_0908.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 471

iverson

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
506
Reaction score
418
blackkite said:
Perhaps radiator cooling air inlet is located at the nose of the aircraft. ;D

Precisely. The radiators for the Bell pusher fighters were located in a duct in the nose of the aircraft.

I've always thought that this might ahve been part of the reason why the pusher P-59's designation was re-used for the Bell jet. Leaks about a new jet fighter might be dismissed on the grounds that the source of the leak misinterpreted the radiator duct as a nose intake.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,205
Thanks a lot for your sharp opinion.
When I see P-59 without propeller, I misunderstand that it's a jet fighter. :D
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,445
Reaction score
6,103
Hi,

maybe this twin boom patent airplane of 1935,inspired the XP-52 design,it was from
Mr. Oscar A. Swanson,Roscoe C. Wilson and Benjamin S. Kelsey.

https://www.google.com/patents/USD100609
 

Attachments

  • USD100609-0.png
    USD100609-0.png
    53 KB · Views: 159

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
820
hesham said:
maybe this twin boom patent airplane of 1935,inspired the XP-52 design,it was from
Mr. Oscar A. Swanson,Roscoe C. Wilson and Benjamin S. Kelsey.
https://www.google.com/patents/USD100609

The location should ring a bell. In fact we've discussed these engineers elsewhere (when we talked about the misidentified "Martin XB-16" project, because Swanson and Wilson were also involved in it). "Dayton, Ohio" indicates that these were Army Air Corps engineers drafting concepts for companies to use as starting points. So perhaps this could have inspired Bell, though I think the configuration for that airplane (a twin-boom cabin pusher) was something that was pretty much "in the air" at the time with many civilian "safety planes" such as the Stearman-Hammond Y-1S for instance.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
121
And Bejamin S. Kelsey was apointed officer-in-charge
of the Fighter projects Office at Wright Field...

He had , as Warren M.Bodie wrotes, a " Wellsian foresight " about
new fighter concepts.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,445
Reaction score
6,103
Thank you for the explanations my dears Skyblazer and Lark.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,205

Attachments

  • 42824622561_2d9c81311b_o.jpg
    42824622561_2d9c81311b_o.jpg
    630.7 KB · Views: 83
  • 29102180608_59cef490fa_b.jpg
    29102180608_59cef490fa_b.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 79
  • 29102180968_fc19a83ab7_b.jpg
    29102180968_fc19a83ab7_b.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 74
  • 29102181178_45dc2af58b_b.jpg
    29102181178_45dc2af58b_b.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top