Kites do seem to have a cost advantage over turbines. One proposal was to work a pair of kites as an opposed pair. This means as the wind reels one kite out it's partner is reeled in. By feathering the kite being reeled in you get net power production.
The benefits in comparison are much lower material and production cost, and the ability to fly higher than turbines, where the wind is stronger and more reliable.
I remember reading about dynamic soaring in New Scientist a few years ago and I found it fascinating. Don't see it being an efficient way of producing electricity but you could make a UAV/drone with indefinite endurance.There's this thing - uses 'dynamic soaring' to extract the energy. I make no comment as to its practicality but I do find dynamic soaring interesting...
https://www.kitemill.com/
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=42&v=vfBceLa3pvQ&feature=emb_title
As an aerospace old timer, I fondly remember from my youthful days that Dynamic Soaring was the tagline of the DynaSoar X-20 concept, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-20_Dyna-Soar, well over six decades ago, so move over, new scientist, if you will.I remember reading about dynamic soaring in New Scientist a few years ago and I found it fascinating. Don't see it being an efficient way of producing electricity but you could make a UAV/drone with indefinite endurance.
Those can be packed a lot closer together than classic wind turbines and need a lot less base materials.Neat, but I prefer the design for vertical axis rotors whose blades can be 'reefed' to the mast...
I think this is the moment for the good old time tested trial and error engineering approach.Those can be packed a lot closer together than classic wind turbines and need a lot less base materials.