AMRAAM-ER

TomS said:
ESSM probably costs more thanks to the specific naval integration bits like the VLS TVC unit.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure it would cost significantly more and as for the VLS TVC component those are driven by the same servos that move the tail-control fins and are jettisoned after the missile pitches over. If the ESSM isn't launched vertically it doesn't have the TVC unit installed.
 
NMaude said:
I'm not sure it would cost significantly more and as for the VLS TVC component those are driven by the same servos that move the tail-control fins and are jettisoned after the missile pitches over. If the ESSM isn't launched vertically it doesn't have the TVC unit installed.
Click to expand...
I went back and realized we have hashed out the differences before.


Basically, there's nothing in ESSM Blk 2 that would make it desirable for use in NASAMS compared to just more AMRAAM-ER. The extra elements are all basically about backwards- or cross-compatibility for naval applications.
 
I wonder if we'll see the ARAAM-ER being air-launched? That would a long range and large no escape zone.
 
NMaude said:
I wonder if we'll see the ARAAM-ER being air-launched? That would a long range and large no escape zone.
Click to expand...
Raytheon has considered it, but it seems unlikely, since it takes up a lot more bay space than standard AMRAAM (1 per side in the F-35A, for example). And USAF also has JATM/AIM-260 that fits inside the same box as an AIM-120.

www.flightglobal.com

Raytheon looks at integrating AMRAAM-ER in F-35A internal carriage

The US Air Force's F-35A could field two examples of the larger missile, one in each internal weapons bay.
www.flightglobal.com www.flightglobal.com
 
TomS said:
Raytheon has considered it, but it seems unlikely, since it takes up a lot more bay space than standard AMRAAM
Click to expand...

There might be countries outside of the USA which would go for it (Since the AIM-260 is unlikely to be available for export for years for example).
 
Wouldn't be an Peregine / Cuda AAM mounted on a ESSM make the perfect "AMRAAM / ESSM ER"? Yes smaller seeker and warhead but from a weight and size point of view possible to do. Longer range would be possible to achieve If the ESSM as booster give "normal" aircraft launch conditions (height and speed) so it can get to the 180km but even 120km would be more than enough (for me atleast)
 
NMaude said:
There might be countries outside of the USA which would go for it (Since the AIM-260 is unlikely to be available for export for years for example).
Click to expand...
You're talking about a 620lb, 10" diameter weapon. 280kg, 254mm diameter. Won't fit into any of the conformal carriage slots on F15 or F18, I don't think.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom