• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

American Secret Projects: Fighters & Interceptors 1945-1978

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,355
Reaction score
3,377
Cover art on Amazon..... Release date October 26th 2007.

http://www.amazon.com/American-Secret-Projects-Tony-Buttler/dp/1857802640/ref=sr_1_5/002-9959425-8904848?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178201311&sr=1-5
 

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
888
Reaction score
49
Why "1945-1978?"

I can only suppose that the purpose is to sell another post-1978 "American Secret Projects" title?
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,355
Reaction score
3,377
For programs prior to 1978, a good deal of information is publicly available. After that we get into the ATF and successor programs where a lot of the relevant information is still classified, there are dozens of fake/misleading drawings, and there is little scope YET for a comprehensive history. Its a story that probably has to wait a few more years if you want more detail than in, say, the F-22 Aerofax.
 

Madoc

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
115
Reaction score
5
OS,

Excellent! And about darn time too!

I really enjoy all the Luft 46 stuff - but let's get some equal billing for our side, eh!

I'm looking forward to this one!

Madoc
 

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,902
Reaction score
1,136
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Madoc said:
I really enjoy all the Luft 46 stuff - but let's get some equal billing for our side, eh!

The real issue is that the US didn't lose the war, so unlike the Germans we didn't have our secret files rifled through and widely distrubuted; and unlike the Soviet Union, we didn't inevitably collapse and get replaced initially with economic chaos and then the sudden discovery that people will pay money to look at obsolete, failed design projects. So, our secret stuff to an annoying degree *stayed* secret.

Things obviously leak out from time to time, but that's not quite the same as whole aircraft companies vomitted forth their archives. Plus, we actually don't *shoot* our lawyers. As a consequence, they can often convince corporations to dump their archives into shredders and incinerators... thus there's often nothing *to* reveal.
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,819
Reaction score
266
What's the aircraft on the cover? It looks like an early F-15/F-X design study to me.
 

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
116
Orionblamblam said:
Madoc said:
I really enjoy all the Luft 46 stuff - but let's get some equal billing for our side, eh!

The real issue is that the US didn't lose the war, so unlike the Germans we didn't have our secret files rifled through and widely distrubuted; and unlike the Soviet Union, we didn't inevitably collapse and get replaced initially with economic chaos and then the sudden discovery that people will pay money to look at obsolete, failed design projects. So, our secret stuff to an annoying degree *stayed* secret.

Things obviously leak out from time to time, but that's not quite the same as whole aircraft companies vomitted forth their archives. Plus, we actually don't *shoot* our lawyers. As a consequence, they can often convince corporations to dump their archives into shredders and incinerators... thus there's often nothing *to* reveal.

And then, of course, you've got short-sighted corporate management that doesn't care to pay the storage bill for the archives. I know this happened at times with Northrop, Rockwell International (NAA), and Cessna. For example, once upon a time at Northrop, I needed to look up how they indexed the boosters on the Snark so that their thrust lines were through the cg of the launched configuration. The write-up on that had been purged from the library and the only way I found the info was from an older engineer who'd worked on the beast.
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,355
Reaction score
3,377
According to Tony, this is probably not the actual cover image at all, just an early mockup.
 

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
888
Reaction score
49
overscan said:
For programs prior to 1978, a good deal of information is publicly available. After that we get into the ATF and successor programs where a lot of the relevant information is still classified, there are dozens of fake/misleading drawings, and there is little scope YET for a comprehensive history. Its a story that probably has to wait a few more years if you want more detail than in, say, the F-22 Aerofax.

I would argue that there is hardly a post-1978 information blackout. There are a few obscure periods, an example being the period of multirole requirement(s)? that predated the single role ATF and ATA.
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,379
Reaction score
1,418
It would be interesting to see a Jay Miller book about the ATF program in general with all the concepts and some history behind the developement and so on. An Aerofax book called ATF/ATA/AX and about an inch and a half thick. ;D
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,301
Reaction score
126
What's the aircraft on the cover? It looks like an early F-15/F-X design study to me.

I'd bet it's an interceptor, look at the cockpit, surely no an FX-era air superiority fighter.
 

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
116
TinWing said:
overscan said:
For programs prior to 1978, a good deal of information is publicly available. After that we get into the ATF and successor programs where a lot of the relevant information is still classified, there are dozens of fake/misleading drawings, and there is little scope YET for a comprehensive history. Its a story that probably has to wait a few more years if you want more detail than in, say, the F-22 Aerofax.

I would argue that there is hardly a post-1978 information blackout. There are a few obscure periods, an example being the period of multirole requirement(s)? that predated the single role ATF and ATA.

Actually, a lot of the post-1978 material is still covered under DOD classification rules for the most part and I doubt what is available covers near all the story.
 
Top