Alternative History : could the United States have developed a non-nuclear ICBM or IRBM missile which could have hit Beijing by late 1950 from SK?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheRejectionist

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
2 February 2022
Messages
244
Reaction score
73
I didn't find anything that could have attested to do that in any of my research, so I was wondering what were your thoughts.
 
I didn't find anything that could have attested to do that in any of my research, so I was wondering what were your thoughts.
Its possible, but why would anyone in 1950s bother to do it? Without nuclear warhead, it would be merely a rather inaccurate and very costly kinetic projectle; at most, an equivalent of a ton of explosives. And the political conseqiences would be as bad as from, say, bomber raid. So possible; just totally impractical.
 
More funding + lighter warheads (biological and chemical weapons).

Before 1950, a ballistic missile with a 100 kg warhead and a range of 1,000 km was possible.
 
What would make it practical?
In 1950s? Nothing. The technology isn't advanced enough to make non-nuclear IRBM a viable solution. The accuracy would be so low, and the cost so high, that nothing could really be achieved that way.

P.S. Why do you need such strange concept, I wonder?
 
I don't believe at that time labs that could fabricated such complex navigation systems that could compensate for the abysmal yield range of conventional explosive, even if you magically invent thermobarics.
 
If you want to hit Beijing with conventional weapons that badly, I'm pretty sure the B-47 force could handle that more than adequately by the end of the Korean War.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom