Air and ground launched cluster submunitions

NMaude said:
Anyone else notice just how crude the Russian iron-bombs are? They have terrible aerodynamics and look like WWII relics.
Click to expand...
On the contray, WW2 bombs were more aerodynamic. That bomb looks like BA, Hannibal and the gang got stuck in a warehouse surrounded by enemies and knocked it together inside of 5 minutes.

www.1stlinedefence.co.uk

History of the 'Tallboy' – a 12,000lb bomb used by the Royal Air Force during WWII

Read about the history of the Tallboy, a 12,000lb bomb developed by the British aeronautical engineer Barnes Wallis and used by the RAF during WWII.
www.1stlinedefence.co.uk www.1stlinedefence.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org

Grand Slam (bomb) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
1709288506069.png

1709288441832.png

There is this fellow from WW1 too:

1709288582055.png
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression that they were deliberately designed to be high-drag bombs, with aerodynamics similar to the US experimental "bluff" bombs from the 1970s.

Certainly the Soviets also developed the M62 series of low-drag bombs, which would be closest equivalent to the US Mk 80 series.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom