Civilian nuclear power and renewables and other power options

It's not about what I think about the detestable wind and photovoltaic energies, reality will just prevail over ideology when the elites understand that they need Artificial Intelligence to survive and that Artificial Intelligence needs enormous amounts of energy (be prepared to have fun when the brainless dinosaur of propaganda tries to turn 180 degrees). There is nothing to object to small human settlements trying to be energy self-sufficient using wind and sun... if they do not try to impose their beliefs on others.
 

Attachments

  • istockphoto-93457843-612x612.jpg
    istockphoto-93457843-612x612.jpg
    43 KB · Views: 4
  • d501e50a-ff2d-477c-b340-8e718ee62cef.png
    d501e50a-ff2d-477c-b340-8e718ee62cef.png
    207.1 KB · Views: 4
  • extinction.png
    extinction.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 3
  • fantasia_t_rex_disneyscreencap__5_by_dracotyrannus_ddunvbw-pre.jpg
    fantasia_t_rex_disneyscreencap__5_by_dracotyrannus_ddunvbw-pre.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 4
Reading the messages, it gives me the impression that we act as agents (like politicians do) of the different economic interests at stake. Could we consider closing these threads and moving on to other less "ideologized" matters?
 
df963d04865387157935f7f14858e45d.jpg
 
Speaking of roadblocks
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-04-economic-patterns-linked-local-renewable.html
Energy density has always been the real issue...a gallon of gasoline actually has more hydrogen than...a gallon of of cryogenic hydrogen. It is easier to store it chemically than mechanically.

Carbon is the P-Diddy of elements...it'll bond with anything...strip the H's from it and it'll put a death grip on any O's it can find. It's controlling that way

That doesn't mean we shouldn't try to just use hydrogen at some level.

Some hope:
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-04-regions-greatest-potential-green-hydrogen.html
 
Last edited:
Speaking of roadblocks
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-04-economic-patterns-linked-local-renewable.html
Energy density has always been the real issue...a gallon of gasoline actually has more hydrogen than...a gallon of of cryogenic hydrogen. It is easier to store it chemically than mechanically.

Carbon is the P-Diddy of elements...it'll bond with anything...strip the H's from it and it'll put a death grip on any O's it can find. It's controlling that way

That doesn't mean we shouldn't try to just use hydrogen at some level.

Some hope:
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-04-regions-greatest-potential-green-hydrogen.html
This explains gasoline v. batteries rather well.

 
And the billion-dollar question, what about the waste?

Regards,
 
Perhaps environmental reasons could be the driver for greater use of reprocessing, both to re-use fissile material and to reduce the worst of the waste. We're spending a fortune on solar and windmills to operate beyond their economic limits, so it's not as if we're shy spending money.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom