Killed the Tomcat, now out there killing Eagles.
Thankfully without any squishy filling.
Three shots, three kills vs peer equivalent is quite impressive. I do believe its the first such case.
TOP GUN 3.0This shootdown will no doubt be analyzed and discussed
I'm not sure that "Own Goal" shutdowns count.
Relax gentlemen, it was a joke hence the wink emoji...Doesn't really count when you're over friendly territory and it was an "ally". One, okay, but THREE? Don't know if Kuwaits legacy Hornets have multi-target simultaneous attack capability.
But perhaps the F-15 could have shot first but didn't want to shoot a friendly, so not really legit.Three shots, three kills vs peer equivalent is quite impressive. I do believe its the first such case.
Ambushing your ally over friendly territory. Yes, very impressive. I'll bet plugging three of your squadmates while they slept in a fox hole would get you a medal. Jesus.Three shots, three kills vs peer equivalent is quite impressive. I do believe its the first such case.
Ambushing your ally over friendly territory. Yes, very impressive. I'll bet plugging three of your squadmates while they slept in a fox hole would get you a medal. Jesus.
But perhaps the F-15 could have shot first but didn't want to shoot a friendly, so not really legit.
It really is, and I'm surprised most people just run with it no questions asked because it's how it's presented in the media. A Legacy Hornet shooting down not one, not two, but three F-15s in a blue-on-blue incident with no communication, no organization, not any form of second guessing or realization? You'd expect allied forces to be aware of who operates where, especially when both have plenty of manned jets active in the same air space. Some form of coordination and control of the air traffic taking place. Especially as both are supposedly professional air forces.This story is fishier than a fish in the sea.
I strongly believe it wasn't a legacy hornet. They have been operating Super Hornets for a while now.It really is, and I'm surprised most people just run with it no questions asked because it's how it's presented in the media. A Legacy Hornet shooting down not one, not two, but three F-15s in a blue-on-blue incident with no communication, no organization, not any form of second guessing or realization? You'd expect allied forces to be aware of who operates where, especially when both have plenty of manned jets active in the same air space. Some form of coordination and control of the air traffic taking place. Especially as both are supposedly professional air forces.
The story made more sense when they still claimed it was a Patriot Battery. But this? It's so laughably implausible, I'm shocked.
USAF Eagles don't have MAWS. Even EX models won't receive it, unless they change their minds after this incident.Does the Eagle have IR warning receivers yet? If so this might be the time....
I strongly believe it wasn't a legacy hornet. They have been operating Super Hornets for a while now.
twentytwo13.my
I know a reporter was told by someone it was a Kuwaiti F/A-18 but that could still be incorrect. I'd hope for some official statement here because this is really an inexcusable incident. Assuming it was an F/A-18 and whoever in charge was uncertain about these suspected targets, there is no reason the pilot shouldn't have been required to get a visual ID on them first.
Well there is also the possibility that the pilot acted with ill intent...
I know a reporter was told by someone it was a Kuwaiti F/A-18 but that could still be incorrect.
At this point it's difficult to imagine the level of incompetence that would be required for it not to be.Well there is also the possibility that the pilot acted with ill intent...
Or, you know, it didn't happen like they claimAt this point it's difficult to imagine the level of incompetence that would be required for it not to be.
Right, right. They were really over Iran.Or, you know, it didn't happen like they claim![]()
That's your interpretation of what I said.Right, right. They were really over Iran.![]()
View: https://x.com/Blaxk__Bird/status/2029736103339774181?s=20I know a reporter was told by someone it was a Kuwaiti F/A-18 but that could still be incorrect. I'd hope for some official statement here because this is really an inexcusable incident. Assuming it was an F/A-18 and whoever in charge was uncertain about these suspected targets, there is no reason the pilot shouldn't have been required to get a visual ID on them first.
Why...? Link 16 is link 16, the E-7 wouldn't have provided anything better than an E-3 would have. Task saturation seems a likely situation assuming the Kuwaiti aircraft was even on the same Link net.I can't help but wonder if an E-7 could have made a difference?
Well, war began with death of a pope equivalent for one of world religions, and (if there are people more in the know feel free to correct me) even on the same level as death of Ali(i.e. how Shia islam was created in the first place).Shooting down 3 friendly US Eagles WVR? He'll probably be locked up for a veeery long time.
If they were Israeli Eagles, he would want to be locked up for the rest of his life.
If he can keep his head.It seems like my imagination just couldn't be as strange as reality. So he really shot down 3 Eagles and at least one WVR lol.
2 more and he's an ace?
That's actually a serious possibility. Mistakes aren't tolerated so well over there and this is a pretty bad one.If he can keep his head.
Assuming it's a mistake. It's difficult to comprehend how incompetent one would have to be to shoot down THREE jets on accident, including at least one (apparently) WVR. The lack of any official detail suggests this isn't a simple "oopsie". In the past at least the bare bones have been known relatively quickly. "Tornado shot down by Patriot", for example.That's actually a serious possibility. Mistakes aren't tolerated so well over there and this is a pretty bad one.
Unless you have GCI flying the plane (like back in the day with F-106s), you still have a pilot looking out the window and shooting down Rodan out there. Three times.GCI glitch of some description perhaps? I seem to recall some proposals in recent times with regards as to moving back to automated (and supposedly more cost effective) Ground Controlled Intercept systems.
Might be a possibility.Maybe he couldn't tell apart an USAF F-15 from an IRIAF F-14?
I mean, it's common knowledge that Gulf pilots aren't the best of the best, add a high stress Situation with Iranian missiles and drones pounding Kuwait and other Gulf States, lots of contacts everywhere and then you have an adversary that flies US jets (and they did actually use their F-4s for strikes, as well as their Su-24s).How could that happen, the F-14 has VG wings whereas the F-15 is more conventional, I think the pilot should spend more time looking at fighter identity books.