Mystery Heinkel 2 x HeS 011 aircraft project

Enlighting this rather interesting subject like you do is quite a responsability, Dan. When will you put this information in a readable form?
 
hesham said:
What about Dornier,was it P.249 ?.
Click to expand...

Dornier wasn't involved in the single-jet fighter competition. And I don't know whether the P 249 was the firm's contender for the Hochleistungsjager requirement or not.

Wurger said:
Enlighting this rather interesting subject like you do is quite a responsability, Dan. When will you put this information in a readable form?
Click to expand...

When I first wrote about the single-jet fighter competition back in 2015, I was in possession of much but not all of the relevant documentation. I now have reports on the September, December, January and February comparison meetings plus a lot more material besides. The trouble is, the whole topic has now been rather done (inaccurately) to death.
 
newsdeskdan said:
Discovered these two disembodied fragments recently. Someone appears to have taken a pair of scissors to them at some point in the past. They were filed as bits of a Heinkel project drawing (or possibly bits of two different drawings?). But what do they depict? Not a trick question - I genuinely can't work it out. I wondered whether it might be a version of the P 1079 given the wing root engine installation?
Click to expand...
Here are the full drawings btw (and I have the entire document plus some aswell)
 

Attachments

  • Screen_Recording_20260115_013530_Drive.jpg
    Screen_Recording_20260115_013530_Drive.jpg
    284 KB · Views: 116
  • Screen_Recording_20260115_013514_Drive.jpg
    Screen_Recording_20260115_013514_Drive.jpg
    273.3 KB · Views: 98
weraboo94 said:
Here are the full drawings btw (and I have the entire document plus some aswell)
Click to expand...
Great! So it is the Heinkel (P-?) 1079-03. Date seems to be the august 1944. Interestingly it had two 20mm MG 151 firing backwards.
 
weraboo94 said:
Here are the full drawings btw (and I have the entire document plus some aswell)
Click to expand...

Those show the 'regular' P 1079. The fragments are subtly differently - showing the rear-facing cannon in the wing roots outboard of the engines, rather than being on the fuselage sides.
 
Comparison of the two drawings.
In my opinion, this is clearly a P 1079 variant, with different wings and the rear-facing cannon in a different position.
 

Attachments

  • 1079.jpg
    1079.jpg
    907.6 KB · Views: 70
Zizi6785 said:
Comparison of the two drawings.
In my opinion, this is clearly a P 1079 variant, with different wings and the rear-facing cannon in a different position.
Click to expand...

As I said before,may it is P.1095,which was developed from P.1079 ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1095.png
    1095.png
    139.4 KB · Views: 66
Zizi6785 said:
Read back this thread!
Click to expand...

I read this thread,and OK,may that drawing for P.1079,but generally
as I mentioned,the P.1095 was based on P.1079,it means the
project 1095 was really existing.
 
hesham said:
That's not my believing,did you read what I mentioned ?,it's from
old German book about Heinkel,and you and all memebers here
don't have Heinkel Archive to judge ?!.
Click to expand...

Probably that's the book.
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    199.4 KB · Views: 50
weraboo94 said:
Im just tired of people saying it didnt exist without any reason especially when there is evidence to counter that.
Oh and why because you didn't listen to reason so I gave you direct proof lol.
And finally" what style!" yea sorry I dont do passive disrespect like you have shown.
Click to expand...
But where is the proof?
You attached a PDF file from P 1075, but we were talking about P 1095. Could it be that you overlooked something and were ultimately mistaken?
 
Zizi6785 said:
But where is the proof?
You attached a PDF file from P 1075, but we were talking about P 1095. Could it be that you overlooked something and were ultimately mistaken?
Click to expand...
The hell is p1095? Thats legit a impossibly the last documents from Heinkel was the p1080 15 more iterations would place it near 1946-1947 unless it was a post war program which i highly doubt considering that there was no money or resources to even build a plane domestically.
My bad my brain must have tuned out the 95 as 75 because the first isn't possible.

Dearest apologies I rescind my previous statements fully
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom