Why do you assume that North Koreans aren't competent in what they doing, considering that they have all modern computer technology & digital engineering tools to work on their first reactor? Don't forget, we are talking about a country that have better ICBM's than USA even plans to have in futureA "Mobile Chernobyl" no doubt!![]()
Because history...?Why do you assume that North Koreans aren't competent in what they doing, considering that they have all modern computer technology & digital engineering tools to work on their first reactor? Don't forget, we are talking about a country that have better ICBM's than USA even plans to have in future![]()
Specify, please. Where and when was any major nuclear incident, involving North Korea?Because history...?
Interesting that the sub looks a bit like US early design for Polaris-carrying submarines (with the massive missile house behind the sail).As with any new DPRK weapons systems, there is a lot of western cope so it's just waste of time to engage with such really. The unusually long sail as pointed by some might be for housing large SLBMs, since 8700 tons is still fairly small for a SSBN. It also seems as far as building goes the sub has yet to receive the black anechoic tiles.
Well, they do have about 15ft/5m worth of missile tube sticking out of the top of the pressure hull.Interesting that the sub looks a bit like US early design for Polaris-carrying submarines (with the massive missile house behind the sail).
Base range requirement is way higher than between US/Russia.Well, they do have about 15ft/5m worth of missile tube sticking out of the top of the pressure hull.
I suppose, two reasons:Well, they do have about 15ft/5m worth of missile tube sticking out of the top of the pressure hull.