Boeing KC-46 Pegasus

FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://aviationweek.com/shows-even...clears-kc-46-deploy-long-official-operational
Click to expand...

What? I cannot believe that the USAF are clearing the KC-46 to deploy long before official operational decision when they cannot even refuel an A-10. Obviously the USAF can’t wait to see the Pegasus doing active operations. :eek:
Click to expand...

A-10 is a pretty small fraction of all refuelling ops, and it's not like all the KC-135s are going to disappear at once. So yeah, it makes sense to get the KC-46 in the rotation now while they sort out the issue that keeps the A-10 from fueling.
 
TomS said:
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://aviationweek.com/shows-even...clears-kc-46-deploy-long-official-operational
Click to expand...

What? I cannot believe that the USAF are clearing the KC-46 to deploy long before official operational decision when they cannot even refuel an A-10. Obviously the USAF can’t wait to see the Pegasus doing active operations. :eek:
Click to expand...

A-10 is a pretty small fraction of all refuelling ops, and it's not like all the KC-135s are going to disappear at once. So yeah, it makes sense to get the KC-46 in the rotation now while they sort out the issue that keeps the A-10 from fueling.
Click to expand...
Indeed.... the KC-46A is to replace less than half of the KC-135Rs... and take well over a decade to do even that.

More than enough time to finish working out the bugs, and to choose and develop the replacement for the rest of the KC-135Rs.
 
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://www.defensenews.com/air/202...c-46-refueling-vision-system-upgrade-to-2025/
Click to expand...

Just as when the KC-46 program was starting to look better. Oh dear!
Click to expand...
To be fair everyone is now days got bit by that bug. Last week that came up in a discussion with an aerospace guy and just this afternoon had the same discussion with an oil and gas guy. Supply chain and labor issues are pretty much intertwined. One of the two complained about the competition from McDonalds (no I won't say which one ;) )
 
BlackBat242 said:
TomS said:
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://aviationweek.com/shows-even...clears-kc-46-deploy-long-official-operational
Click to expand...

What? I cannot believe that the USAF are clearing the KC-46 to deploy long before official operational decision when they cannot even refuel an A-10. Obviously the USAF can’t wait to see the Pegasus doing active operations. :eek:
Click to expand...

A-10 is a pretty small fraction of all refuelling ops, and it's not like all the KC-135s are going to disappear at once. So yeah, it makes sense to get the KC-46 in the rotation now while they sort out the issue that keeps the A-10 from fueling.
Click to expand...
Indeed.... the KC-46A is to replace less than half of the KC-135Rs... and take well over a decade to do even that.

More than enough time to finish working out the bugs, and to choose and develop the replacement for the rest of the KC-135Rs.
Click to expand...
The answers Boeing, now what's the question ?
 
mkellytx said:
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://www.defensenews.com/air/202...c-46-refueling-vision-system-upgrade-to-2025/
Click to expand...

Just as when the KC-46 program was starting to look better. Oh dear!
Click to expand...
To be fair everyone is now days got bit by that bug. Last week that came up in a discussion with an aerospace guy and just this afternoon had the same discussion with an oil and gas guy. Supply chain and labor issues are pretty much intertwined. One of the two complained about the competition from McDonalds (no I won't say which one ;) )
Click to expand...
As an electrician by trade, the industry is plagued by shortages... circuit breakers, breaker panels, disconnect switches, and many other things have had periods of non-availability (some lasting for months) over the last two & a half years.

Right now our supply houses are out of common panels, that have been back-ordered for months.
 
Last edited:
Archibald said:
a single pilot
Click to expand...
So no girlfriends allowed onboard KC-46s ?
Click to expand...
The only dating allowed would be like this "conjugal* visit"!

https://archive.jsonline.com/news/97641399.html/

July 01, 2010
As reunions go, it only lasted a few minutes.
But Jeff and Christine McLean were thrilled nonetheless to see each other, even though they couldn't hug, let alone kiss.
Married in May 2009, the couple has spent most of their first year of marriage apart.
Really far apart. As in different cockpits in different airspaces.

Air Force Capt. Christine McLean pilots a refueling plane and Navy Lt. Jeff McLean flies an F/A-18 Super Hornet.
After Christine McLean was deployed from England to southwest Asia in May for refueling missions in the skies over Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries, she hoped she might hook up - literally - with her husband, who has been flying combat and support missions from the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier since January.

But it wasn't until last week, on Jeff McLean's final and 40th flight on this deployment that he rendezvoused with the air refuelers over Pakistan and was happy to see it was his wife's plane.
As commander of her KC-135 Stratotanker, Christine McLean speaks to pilots of planes maneuvering behind the refueler to top off their fuel tanks. So the couple spoke for a short time. It was dark, which meant only a brief glimpse for the husband and wife.
Click to expand...


* Yes... he "put his probe in her basket"! ;)

The plane (bottom) of Navy Lt. Jeff McLean is refueled over Pakistan by the plane of his wife of one year, Christine McLean, whom he has not seen in six months. The photograph was taken by his wingman. The refueling rendezvous was a chance encounter on Jeff’s final mission.
The plane (bottom) of Navy Lt. Jeff McLean is refueled over Pakistan by the plane of his wife of one year, Christine McLean, whom he has not seen in six months. The photograph was taken by his wingman. The refueling rendezvous was a chance encounter on Jeff’s final mission. Credit: Photo courtesy of McLean family
 
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://www.defensenews.com/news/yo...eaks-dents-plane-while-refueling-fighter-jet/
Click to expand...

Oh no, how much will it cost to repair the KC-46. And more importantly what happened to the fighter that it dented when it was refuelling?
Click to expand...
The fighter was undamaged. The dent was to the KC-46A!

The tanker was on its way from Glasgow Prestwick Airport in Scotland to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, when it was tasked to gas up an F-15, an Air Force official confirmed Wednesday.

Investigators believe that during the rendezvous, the two aircraft were traveling at such different speeds that the refueling boom forcibly broke away from the fighter jet and slammed back into the KC-46, the official said. The Pegasus safely continued on to New Jersey after the mishap.
.....
While the service believes it will cost at least $2.5 million to repair the KC-46, the official said he isn’t aware of any damage to the F-15.
Click to expand...

So basically the F-15 jock forcibly broke contact, causing the boom to rebound up into the KC-46A until it broke... not really the Boeing's fault!

CkRqbIPplEJ
boom boo-boo.jpg
 
The $2.5 million number is really just a guess, based on calling this a potential Class A mishap (that's the cost threshold for Class A). But looking at this picture, the boom outer sleeve is cracked clean across so who knows what happened to the inner portion. That's a lot of inspection work just to see what is broken.

And of course these estimates include costs like manpower, even for service members whose costs are really sunk anyway.
 
BlackBat242 said:
FighterJock said:
Grey Havoc said:
https://www.defensenews.com/news/yo...eaks-dents-plane-while-refueling-fighter-jet/
Click to expand...

Oh no, how much will it cost to repair the KC-46. And more importantly what happened to the fighter that it dented when it was refuelling?
Click to expand...
The fighter was undamaged. The dent was to the KC-46A!

The tanker was on its way from Glasgow Prestwick Airport in Scotland to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, when it was tasked to gas up an F-15, an Air Force official confirmed Wednesday.

Investigators believe that during the rendezvous, the two aircraft were traveling at such different speeds that the refueling boom forcibly broke away from the fighter jet and slammed back into the KC-46, the official said. The Pegasus safely continued on to New Jersey after the mishap.
.....
While the service believes it will cost at least $2.5 million to repair the KC-46, the official said he isn’t aware of any damage to the F-15.
Click to expand...

So basically the F-15 jock forcibly broke contact, causing the boom to rebound up into the KC-46A until it broke... not really the Boeing's fault!

CkRqbIPplEJ
View attachment 686786
Click to expand...

So it was the F-15 pilots fault for denting the KC-46, any ideas as to how much it is going to cost to repair the damage to the tanker?
 
Arjen said:
Not necessarily the F-15's pilot fault. Weather, turbulence?
Click to expand...

So it was turbulent air behind the denting and not the pilots fault after all, and also how long will it take to get the tanker repaired and back to operations?
 
And the KC-46 woes continue. At least our Centerline Drogue System (CDS) is and has been a silver lining, worked right out of the box!
 
Additional storage space and cups holders: Boeing finalize KC-46 RVS2.0 upgrade

One of the biggest changes in RVS 2.0 is the overhaul of the displays the boom operators look at during the refueling process. Currently, boom operators wear 3D glasses and “[look] directly at an LCD monitor which is projecting in 3D,” Ford said. But after evaluating multiple ways to display the camera imagery, the Air Force and Boeing coalesced around an “indirect view” display where an LCD monitor projects 3D imagery to a curved mirror, which provides more depth perception to the user.

“Part of that, I think, was because of the legacy experience of looking at a window,” Burgess said. “So we wanted to do something that that provided more immersive experience for the boom operator, something that felt more true to life than just looking at a flat panel display.”

Reporters on the tour donned 3D glasses to try out the new display system, staring into an angled mirror from which an image of an F-16 appeared to jut out from the screen, making contact with a KC-46 boom. The picture was clear, with the 3D depiction appearing true to life and no distracting shadows or reflections of light.
Click to expand...

https://breakingdefense.com/2022/12...s-boeing-thinks-its-finally-cracked-the-code/
 
TomcatViP said:
15 more KC-46 ordered.

Boeing said Monday this brings the number of KC-46s the Air Force has under contract to 128, 68 of which are delivered and in use.

Boeing is also under contract for 10 more KC-46s to partner nations, six for Japan and four for Israel. Japan has already received its first two KC-46s.
Click to expand...

https://www.defensenews.com/air/202...wards-boeing-23b-contract-for-15-more-kc-46s/
Click to expand...

Finally some good news for the KC-46. I take it that the problems that have been plaguing the tanker have been sorted.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom