• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Wingless Jet VTOL Transport Aircraft

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,625
Reaction score
4,586

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    21.7 KB · Views: 378
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    20.5 KB · Views: 347
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    18.2 KB · Views: 336
  • 4.JPG
    4.JPG
    17.8 KB · Views: 328
  • 5.JPG
    5.JPG
    25.6 KB · Views: 323
Last edited:

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
596
Apparently it was to be sustained by the array of side jets... and geared through various shifts of the same... You could pay me a million bucks and I still would NOT climb into one of these if they existed!
 

OM

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
752
Reaction score
14
Website
www.io.com
...Why is it that when I saw that, the first thing that popped into my mind was "No bucks, no Buck Rogers...literally!"?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,625
Reaction score
4,586
Hi,

also a wingless transport VTOL aircraft.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19750011151_1975011151.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Wingless.JPG
    Wingless.JPG
    31.4 KB · Views: 50

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,625
Reaction score
4,586
Hi,

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/12-Foot_Low_Speed_Tunnel
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 67
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 65
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 55
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 77

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,614
Reaction score
167
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
Say: wingless aircraft. Say it again together: "wingless aircraft". Now say something else: flying brick. Lost propulsion? Say: falling brick.
 

ChuckAnderson

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
187
Reaction score
18
Wasn't there a wingless jet aircraft design nicknamed the "Flying Pig"?

I remember reading about that somewhere.
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,874
Reaction score
362
Stargazer2006 said:
Apparently it was to be sustained by the array of side jets... and geared through various shifts of the same... You could pay me a million bucks and I still would NOT climb into one of these if they existed!

There isn't any indication of intermediate gearing, or are you referring to the turn tables themselves? My guess, like many early VTOL projects is they had the number of engines they had such that the loss of one or more of the engines wouldn't be catastrophic. Still, that many engines seems risky for the time. However, given the reliability of today's engines, I could see this as doable. But, there are probably better layouts for the lift system with today's powerplants. Such as, just having two engines on each side of the fuselage, an F-35 lift-fan type system, but that would take up so much fuselage volume, I don't know that it would be worth it. Having said that, I find this design very cool, especially how well it compares to a standard aircraft in the low altitude regime it is meant to fly in.
 

Jemiba

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,282
Reaction score
1,204

Lauge

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
434
Reaction score
12
Regardless of any safety/reliability issues, just imagine the kind of specific fuel consumption this thing would have (think: guzzling JP4 like a hole in the ground......), relying as it apparently does on direct jet lift. And ground erosion? Ground erosion would dig the above-mentioned hole in the ground for you. And judging from the shape, there's not much chance of body lift, even at speed.

But all the same, pretty cool.

Regards & all,

Thomas L. Nielsen
Luxembourg
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,625
Reaction score
4,586
Hi,

as I know also a lighter transport Project was considerable.
 
Top