- Joined
- 4 July 2010
- Messages
- 2,647
- Reaction score
- 3,611
Yes that would be relevant if both companies' current state of being were down to who took Navy or USAF contracts. Grumman thrived, for decades, on Navy work while also finding time to tackle other challenges like the LEM. The implication that only fools or the desperate should take Navy contracts is silly.Where is Grumman today? Where is Lockheed?As much as I celebrate the achievements of Kelly Johnson and Ben Rich, I imagine Leroy Grumman would have responded to that with one hell of an eye roll.