• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Unknown Martin delta wing project

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,346
Reaction score
1,094
Great find my dear Overscan,

I think it was Model-251 high performance bomber,that because
it was similar the Model-245 a little.
 

Petrus

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
524
Reaction score
37
Do you have any info on the Model 251?

Piotr
 

rousseau

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
315
Reaction score
5
I suggest you search information concerning this by hypersonic aspect.
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,028
Reaction score
224
I think, half circular around the nose . ???
 

Attachments

Jos Heyman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
597
Reaction score
2
I do not think Model 251 is correct. This model number is about early 1950s - IMHO too early for such a design.

May be more like models 344, 345, 346 (all three attack aircaft), 350, 351 (both bombers for the USAF) or 358 (a supersonic attack bomber for the US Navy). All these seem to be late 1950s/early 1960s.

Jos Heyman
 

airrocket

Dreams To Reality
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
291
Reaction score
2
Website
RetroFlight.com
Very clean design. I also wonder about intake location also how does it land with the lower fins? Could it be rocket not airbreather (no need for intakes)?
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,028
Reaction score
224
Thanks for this photo, Scott !

And with the fin, there shouldn't be a problem, as there wasn't with
the MiG 23 either.
 

Attachments

airrocket

Dreams To Reality
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
291
Reaction score
2
Website
RetroFlight.com
I see the intakes now very clearly. Still strange intake inlet application. Yes looks supersonic so the nose cone would generate a shock, which could produce shock on lip external compression application. The inlets appear to be of 2D angular design. Very interesting combination. Striking clean streamline design makes want to build an RC EDF flying model. Way cool and thanks for posting!
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,350
Reaction score
436
airrocket said:
So would the lower strake or dorsal fin fold like MIG or eject like X-15?
Probably fold like the XF8U-3 or YF-12A. With it being an air-breather it's likely it could takeoff in which case it would need to fold it.
 

Yeager

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Nov 15, 2019
Messages
30
Reaction score
13
I do not think Model 251 is correct. This model number is about early 1950s - IMHO too early for such a design.

May be more like models 344, 345, 346 (all three attack aircaft), 350, 351 (both bombers for the USAF) or 358 (a supersonic attack bomber for the US Navy). All these seem to be late 1950s/early 1960s.

Jos Heyman
Appendix 1 of American Secret Projects: Bombers, Attack, & ASW Aircraft on page 218 identifies Model 251 as a four-jet hi-performance bomber from 1949, and on page 219 it identifies the Model 358 as similar to the Model 329. Models 345 and 346 were Martin proposals for the TS-149 contest that was won by the Grumman A2F Intruder, so aren't viable candidates for the Martin delta-wing model. Does anyone have project documents for the Martin Model 344, 350, and 351 to compare with Martin delta wing plane desktop model?
 
Top