• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Supermarine 322

cluttonfred

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
98
Website
cluttonfred.info
I have liked the look of the Supermarine 322 "Dumbo" since seeing it in Tony Buttler's book and elsewhere. I am also tickled by the fact that the clean, fixed-gear design meant that it faster than the retractable-gear Fairey Barracuda with the same engine.

I have often wondered, though, at what an operational version was planned to look like had it been accepted. The two prototypes built were partially of wood and seemed more like testbeds for the variable incidence wing, not actual prototype combat aircraft. Does anyone have any artists impressions, cutaways or other images that show what Dumbo might have looked like in fighting trim?
 

Justo Miranda

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
4,222
Reaction score
1,868
From "Aircraft of the fighting powers" vol.VII (1946)
by Owen Thetford
Argus Books Ltd.
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    123.5 KB · Views: 436
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    314.2 KB · Views: 342
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    182 KB · Views: 308

Jemiba

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,222
Reaction score
931
Thank you, Justo, that's the best drawing of this type, I've seen so far !

"..what an operational version was planned to look like.."
I would think, not very different to the prototype. In those times, there weren't
many "concept demonstrators", I think, just prototypes of service aircraft. Main
question then would be the rear armament, the position is already visible on the
drawing, just above the roundel. My guess is a tilting canopy, similar to that in
the Barracuda. Just a guess, of course, without any supporting sources !
 

Attachments

  • with_rear_gun.GIF
    with_rear_gun.GIF
    33.6 KB · Views: 296

Jemiba

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,222
Reaction score
931
Well, I've experimented with a contemporary turret, like the Bristol BX, too,
but it seems to bulky to me and vastly increasing drag in cruise flight, as it
wasn't retractable ...
 

Attachments

  • with_rear_turret.GIF
    with_rear_turret.GIF
    98.5 KB · Views: 259

cluttonfred

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
98
Website
cluttonfred.info
Thanks all for the info and imagination. I agree that the the hatch-like solution was likely, and you can see the glassless outline on the prototypes.

By the way does anyone have any info or images on the variable incidence wing mechanism which was Dumbo's reason for being?

Cheers,

Matthew
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,805
Reaction score
70
Matthew,

for some interior details please go to:
flightglobal.com
choose :Flight April 25th 1946 - page 409.

Succes.
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,583
Reaction score
884
Matthew,

According to BSP, the operational Supermarine 322 (to S.34/27) was to be fitted with either the R-R Exe or the Bristol Taurus. The top-view drawing shows increased taper on the outer wing panels, spats on the fixed main gear and what appears to be a flush-fitting, louvred covering over the rear position.

I'm speculating that the operational 'Dumbo' would have looked something like the attached.
 

Attachments

  • supermarine-322.jpg
    supermarine-322.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 118

T-50

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
362
Reaction score
22
What a ugly crate is this!! it hardly to believe that this thing is from the same company as the spitfire.
it is unworthy to bear the name supermarine
T-50
 

cluttonfred

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
98
Website
cluttonfred.info
Ugly is as ugly does...it does have pretty tailfeathers, and next to a Fairey Barracuda anything looks good.

Thanks all for the efforts...I have learned a lot.

Cheers,

Matthew
 
J

joncarrfarrelly

Guest
T-50 said:
What a ugly crate is this!! it hardly to believe that this thing is from the same company as the spitfire.
it is unworthy to bear the name supermarine
T-50
You've evidently not seen many Supermarine aircraft.
 

Boogey

B'Boomelang
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
7
All the pictures and photos placed here are of Supermarine Type 380 Dumbo, the second prototype.
The first prototype, Supermarine Type 322 Dumbo, had smaller rounded tail
and differed also in exhaust pipes shape.
 

Similar threads

Top