Radar Absorbing Materials and Structures (RAM / RAS), stealth (LO) coatings

As I understand it is that Stealth is 80-90% shaping of the plane.You should be able to make a plane out of metal in a specific shape, and it would reflect less then a plane that is not shaped.
IMHO, that only true for full stealth aircraft like B-2, F-117. Whereas, the radar scattering of semi stealth fighter like F-35, Su-57 aren't very impressive.
 

No, RAM does not necessarily behave that way. Thicker is rarely "better". There is an ideal depth for a given material. Modern aircraft often have several stacked layers of RAM that are meant to work together. For example, a low frequency coating that allows higher frequencies through with some attenuation, and below that a high frequency material.
The only reason that I can think of that can possibly make a thinner RAM more effective than thicker RAM layer is the reflection at boundary (before the wave enter the material). So if a metal sheet is placed at 1/4 wavelength distance below that RAM surface then it can prevent front face reflection. But even for X-band, that still need pretty thick layer

The inlets of the F-22 have about a dozen layers of coating.
That would be questionable I think, the full coating these look like 1-2 mm thick at most
 
So thickness in order of Centimeters and differing types of coat can be expected.
 
A "new" coating?

This may yet be a re-discovery. If truly new---maybe a way to give stealth to more conventional airframes?

Space skin
 
Last edited:
That’s a valid point; how much stealth coating effectiveness gets degraded by dirt and water?
chipped coating or other damage can significantly increase visibility. For a T-75 fighter with a 0.2 m2 RCS or an F-22 with a 0.3 m2 RCS, this is significant
 

Attachments

  • hana_epr.jpg
    hana_epr.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 53
That’s a valid point; how much stealth coating effectiveness gets degraded by dirt and water?
Water/humidity, dirt, and UV all contribute to the degradation of a coating stack. Voids (bubbles) form between layers and then "pop" taking off the coating, etc.
 
Fun fact, the inlet of F-35 and F-22 use some sort of RAM with white color, unlike the outer skin

View attachment 679751
View attachment 679752
That's white paint/topcoat. Though it's probably not using Titanium dioxide as the white pigment.

All jet inlets are painted white at a certain point. (Possible exception for the blackbirds due to heat levels) You need to be able to see anything inside the inlets before starting the engine.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom