• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Sparrow II active radar homing missile

overscan

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,600
Reaction score
1,068
Length: 148"
Diameter: 8"
Wingspan: 40.128"
Tailspan:32"
Weight: 420lb (warhead: 72lb inc fuse (49lb warhead), seeker 47kg)
Seeker: Bendix AN/DPN-21 active radar seeker
Range: 6nm
Velocity: 3000ft/sec
Altitude: 100-60000ft

Source:
C.M. Hanson: "Characteristics of Strategic, Tactical and Research Missiles", Convair San Diego, 1954/58
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD388603
 

Attachments

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,624
Reaction score
230
Wasn't this missile studied for the F-5D Skylancer, then took over by the Canadians for their CF-105 Arrow ? How far did the whole program go ?
 

Trident

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
846
Reaction score
27
A comparison of the internal layout with modern ARH missiles is quite telling - the seeker on this very early design is so large that the warhead is located behind the wings and the rocket motor is very short too.
 

Kadija_Man

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
1,949
Reaction score
29
Trident said:
A comparison of the internal layout with modern ARH missiles is quite telling - the seeker on this very early design is so large that the warhead is located behind the wings and the rocket motor is very short too.
Most air-to-air missiles have their warheads amidships.
 

gtg947h

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
79
Reaction score
3
rickshaw said:
Trident said:
A comparison of the internal layout with modern ARH missiles is quite telling - the seeker on this very early design is so large that the warhead is located behind the wings and the rocket motor is very short too.
Most air-to-air missiles have their warheads amidships.
Yes, but not that far aft... AIM-120, for example, has a much shorter electronic section (proportional to total length), so the warhead is further forward and the motor is longer. So same layout, but different proportions because the early electronics were much bulkier.
 

SOC

I look at pictures all day
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
8
Archibald said:
Wasn't this missile studied for the F-5D Skylancer, then took over by the Canadians for their CF-105 Arrow ? How far did the whole program go ?
Sparrow II was considered for the Arrow and was trialled on a CF-100. Ultimately the Arrow was to have used 8 Hughes GAR-1 Falcon AAMs, Sparrow II was investigated briefly as a better option. USN killed Sparrow II in 1956, the RCAF dropped it in 1958. Both sides basically killed it due to the problems of making a fully active radar guided AAM in the 1950s.
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,624
Reaction score
230
Seems that Canadair got the contract.

I quick search show that the Skylancer had an APQ-64 radar. The Sparrow II was k-band.
Main problems found were
- K-band at the time couldn't see through clouds and rain (pretty annoying)
- active homing on the AMRAAM is only for the final dash on the target, this wasn't known in Sparrow II days
- both APQ-64 and the missile K-band seeker were very limited in performance by 50's electronics, vacuum tubes included.
- range was a miserable 5 nautic miles !

Since the Arrow radar was called ASTRA, I wonder if it was a copy of the APQ-64. What is interesting is that the Arrow nosecone should have been much larger than the Skylancer, considering these aircraft respective sizes... maybe they hoped to boost k-band efficiency through a larger size.
Considering the difficulties encountered by the Sparrow II, it is no surprise it doomed the program. The RCAF evidently fell to the deadly lure of "fire and forget, AMRAAM in the 50's". Truth is, it was exciting, imagine, if they had made it to work, the tactical advantage the Arrow would have had shooting bombers.

Considering the miserable range plus all the seeker issues, Sparrow III was the right choice even with SARH. Considering its pathetic reliability rate in Vietnam, imagine Sparrow II in the same context... better to arm Phantoms with RPG-7s !
 
Last edited:

Forest Green

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
425
Reaction score
118
Length: 148"
Diameter: 8"
Wingspan: 40.128"
Tailspan:32"
Weight: 420lb (warhead: 72lb inc fuse (49lb warhead), seeker 47kg)
Seeker: Bendix AN/DPN-21 active radar seeker
Range: 6nm
Velocity: 3000ft/sec
Altitude: 100-60000ft

Source:
C.M. Hanson: "Characteristics of Strategic, Tactical and Research Missiles", Convair San Diego, 1954/58
Only 6nm, or 60nm?
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,254
Reaction score
146
Only 6nm, or 60nm?
From the cited doc 6nm is right, and I can't imagine why it would be much more. AIM-7C was publicly credited with about 6-7nm, and I don't think any version of AIM-7 ever reached 60nm, even with the much better seekers and dual-stage motors in the final models. The usual number cited for AIM-7F/M/P is 43nm.
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,624
Reaction score
230
plus if the freakkin' K-band seeker couldn't see through rain or clouds... the missile range will be pretty short...
 
Top