Solid State Laser News

So were previous efforts where they had claimed they had gone through and matured multiple generations of systems..Have been seeing this and hearing it from their folks for a long time..Meanwhile, it would be interesting to get an update from them on their actual funded HEL system (300kW) where they are partnered with Boeing IIRC.

Which previous airborne platforms weren't IRAD for GA? Their partnership with Boeing to put an airborne laser on some Boeing aircraft was IRAD (which branched off the OSD Boeing-GA-ASI partnership for the 300kW laser) and so is the current F-15 proposal
 
Which previous airborne platforms weren't IRAD for GA? Their partnership with Boeing to put an airborne laser on some Boeing aircraft was IRAD (which branched off the OSD Boeing-GA-ASI partnership for the 300kW laser) and so is the current F-15 proposal

I don't remember exact internal program names but GA folks highlighted internal investments they made that positioned them on HELLADS and other similar efforts towards SWaP optimized HEL's. I have been hearing this from them since at least 2013.
 
I don't remember exact internal program names but GA folks highlighted internal investments they made that positioned them on HELLADS and other similar efforts towards SWaP optimized HEL's. I have been hearing this from them since at least 2013.

Okay yeah, that makes more sense. Most of their work on airborne lasers has been for SWaP optimization (like the aforementioned 250kW airborne laser with Boeing).

Doing a cursory look it seems like the MQ-9's laser has been in development for at least several years with IRAD funding. A report in 2021 mentioned a similar setup to the one under contract for the USAF and USMC now. It's a similar (if not identical) setup to their current program which is no longer running on IRAD funds.

Testing is supposed to start this year so I guess now it's just the waiting game to see if there are any actual announcements about it.

Appreciate the info :D
 
Testing is supposed to start this year so I guess now it's just the waiting game to see if there are any actual announcements about it.

Perhaps I'm just getting old but "we'll be testing it out this summer / fall / later in the winter..." has also been a very consistent theme from them in the last decade.

Again, when they actually deliver things or show actual test footage, I will believe them. Looks like a PR stunt to me.
 
Perhaps I'm just getting old but "we'll be testing it out this summer / fall / later in the winter..." has also been a very consistent theme from them in the last decade.

Again, when they actually deliver things or show actual test footage, I will believe them. Looks like a PR stunt to me.

Scott is usually good to us when it comes to stuff like this (operative word: usually), so I'll take your word for it

You've been in the game longer than me hahahah
 
Given the rate at which the Houthis are shooting down their drones...repurposing them for CUAS might be an effective pitch so they might pull something like this off like a fielding a 25-30kW airborne HEL say in the next 10-15 years.
 
"Small-scale laser systems enable high energy proton accelerator on a table top."

Today's phys.org....the study from Tata University (?)

--also from there--"Researchers uncover a mechanism enabling glasses to self-regulate their brittleness."

Optics

Scan tech


Street view

Sobering

Article on lasers
 
Last edited:
Lasers for scanning
According to the study published in Physical Review Letters, the developed setup includes multiple laser emitters that enable super-resolution imaging of targets as small as millimeters in scale from a 1.36 kilometers (0.85 miles) distance in an outdoor urban environment. The device successfully images letter-shaped physical targets measuring 8×9 mm, with letter widths of 1.5 mm, placed at the far end of its imaging range.

I guess you could say it is...phased?
Scientists have discovered a way to convert fluctuating lasers into remarkably stable beams that defy classical physics, opening new doors for photonic technologies that rely on both high power and high precision.

Display
Recently, a research team led by Professor Junsuk Rho at POSTECH (Pohang University of Science and Technology) has developed a groundbreaking metasurface technology that can display up to 36 high-resolution images on a surface thinner than a human hair. This research has been published in Advanced Science.

Vortex beams
 
Lasers and optics
 
Light…controlled

Crystals and optics

Images

Tricorder
 
Last edited:

MDA grows research project to advance pulsed laser to nearly $50 million in Rochester​

 

MDA grows research project to advance pulsed laser to nearly $50 million in Rochester​

This is a data collection effort to support pulsed laser lethality modeling and simulation according to https://www.highergov.com/contract-...er-laborator-hq0860-23-c-6000-p00006-s-fc4e6/ which states "Under this modification, the contractor will define and conduct tests to collect anchoring data to benchmark/verify physics-based pulsed laser lethality modeling. Models, simulations, and lethality toolsets developed shall support analysis against a variety of DoD threats and across ground, sea, air and space domains. Upon Government direction, models of relevant threats and threat support systems shall be combined with trajectories to inform a full continuity lethality and military utility picture. The work will be performed in Rochester, New York. The period of performance is from May 31, 2023 through May 30 2028."
 
High power

I can see through your head

Seeing through fog

Optics

small accelerator

lighting
 
Last edited:
DARPA set a new Laser power transmission stepstone with a series of test designed to replicate operational systems:

recent tests in New Mexico [set] new records. Previously, the POWER system managed to use a laser to beam 230 watts across one mile (1.7 km) for 25 seconds, and an undisclosed lesser amount of power as far as 2.3 miles (3.7 km). Now, DARPA has managed to increase this to 800 watts for 30 seconds at a distance of 5.3 miles (8.6 km).
[...]
The system is built around what is called the Power Receiver Array Demo (PRAD), which is a ball-like structure that has a compact aperture to allow a laser beam to enter. This beam strikes a parabolic mirror that scatters the light and shines it on an array of dozens of photovoltaic calls. These convert the laser light back into electricity.

At the moment, DARA is concentrating on power and distance, so the present efficiency of the system being a mere 20% is acceptable, though there are plans to improve this as the technology is scaled up.

 
UK buying two short range (4-5 km?) DragonFire 50kw lasers for £200 million / $270 million for Royal Navy.

At these prices lasers would appear unaffordable.

https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/029984-2025

The US Navy contracted Lockheed in 2018 for the semi-equivalent HELIOS 60kw laser, one was fitted to the Burke USS Preble for trials in 2024, as far as know it was the only one installed on a Burke. The Navy is replacing the Phalanx ~ 1.5km CIWS on Burkes with RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM) ~10-15km, either with the MK 49 (21 cell) or SeaRAM (11 cell).

Adm. Daryl Caudle, US Fleet Forces Commander said at SNA 2025 the Navy should be “embarrassed” by the fact it hasn’t managed yet to scale directed energy weapons onboard its ships despite having experimented with the technology since the Reagan administration, but we’ve not transitioned that into a place where that’s an acceptable way to actually take out missile systems, we just haven’t really matriculated that into a place … that’s ready for prime time.

State of Navy's shipboard laser efforts is embarrassing, says top fleet commander - Breaking Defense
 
Ever since the shield was invented in response to the sword, every kind of offensive weapon has spawned some form of defense. So, how will lasers be countered?
 
Adm. Daryl Caudle, US Fleet Forces Commander said at SNA 2025 the Navy should be “embarrassed” by the fact it hasn’t managed yet to scale directed energy weapons onboard its ships despite having experimented with the technology since the Reagan administration, but we’ve not transitioned that into a place where that’s an acceptable way to actually take out missile systems, we just haven’t really matriculated that into a place … that’s ready for prime time.

The ships don't have great SwAP margins and the ships that do (DDG-1000) have other priorities and are too few to begin with. If you aren't going to get the 100kW class (60kW throttled on DDG-51) HELIOS on the Flight III DDG-51 (which looks tough given power and thermal margins consumed by the radar and EW) and FFGX then 'adopting' HEL's on surface ships is basically not going to happen at scale until DDG(X) arrives 10-15 years from now. By that time the SOTA would be in the 300-500kW class so that is probably what needs to go on DDG(X) though I'm not sure the Navy is in a position to push for that aggressive an adoption on flight 1 DDG(X).

The 'mature design / mature tech' advantage of the Flight III also has drawbacks in that the ship is basically maxed out from day 1.

Land based 20-300kW systems can possibly begin proliferating across US forces this decade. HII is already building the 30kW production designs for the Army's cUAS roles. If IFPC HEL works, LM can do the same for the larger 300kW class systems. It may make sense to field those 30kW systems in palletized forms aboard ships deploying to areas where the small UAS threat is significant. That is probably easier to scale than trying to do ship mods and full CS integrations.
 
Last edited:
Captain Mark Vandroff who was Program Manager for Burkes said back in 2016 that the Flight IIA max load was just over 4MW and with two of its three of its GT 3MW generators, which Navy always keep running in case load ever exceeds 3MW as it take time to sync with bus even though load could be well below that of a single generator, makes it expensive in fuel consumption - net max output of the two running 3MW generators is 5.8MW (Burkes 3rd generator always kept as reserve). So approx. 1.5MW margin so no shortage of power for lasers though unknown how much power would be remaining for any Burkes IIA converted to Mod 2 status with SPY-6(V)4 and SEWIP Block 3.
 
China claims to have developed a 2.47 kw laser capable of operating in a wide variety of temperatures without climate control systems. They say it can destroy a target a kilometer away.

 
That is a bit worrisome:
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lwTXtG9v4L0


I wonder if some of these landers are vulnerable to super-reflective bits in the lunar regolith.


masers and lasers

Plasma

Proton beam

electricity control

On lasers and optics

X-Ray lens and electrons
Using only a single-crystal piezoelectric thin wafer of lithium niobate (LN) instead of the usual two-part structure, a group from Nagoya University in Japan has created a deformable mirror that changes X-ray beam size by more than 3,400 times. This improved tuning range enhances both imaging and analysis, especially for the X-rays used in industry.

 
Last edited:
Chinese military Vessel lasered German Maritime Patrol Aircraft in the red sea:

The surveillance aircraft was part of the EU mission Aspides, which is intended to better defend civilian ships against attacks by Houthi rebels based in Yemen. It was lasered earlier this month “without any reason or prior contact” by a Chinese warship that had been encountered several times in the area, the German Defense Ministry said.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom