Skylab A is not salvaged: a brief TL

Archibald

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
6 June 2006
Messages
11,847
Reaction score
13,537

The above clearly shows how hard it was for Conrad and Kerwin to unstuck the solar array.

Whatif they had failed ?

Skylab A would remain a derelict, 150 000 pounds and $2.5 billion wreck.

Of course Skylab B could be launched: 10 months after May 1973, with some more margin to avoid another fiasco.


To simplify things let's say it launches exactly a year after Skylab A.

And then... shit hits the fan. As Skylab A; its S-II; and another S-II (from Skylab B !) now will all reenter. OTL nobody cared about Skylab A's S-II in January 1975. And Skylab A itself was manned and reboosted... yet we all know how it ended in July 1979.

So ITTL the situation is kind of thrice as worse: the derelict Skylab A trigger attention over it's S-II... and it's sister S-II.

And NASA takes a lot of heat in Congress and public opinion.

(more on this later)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom