• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

SibNIA An-2-based mods (TVS-2AM, TVS-2MS, TVS-2DT, TVS-2DTS)

Silencer1

That now I am the Ruler of the Queen's Navee!
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
642
Reaction score
154
There were certain attempts to extend live of Antonov An-2 biplane.
Now, in Novosibirsk it's all-composite prototype flies


Google translation of the page:
http://www.sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=5711



06/10/2015
The prototype light multipurpose aircraft made its first flight from the airport of Novosibirsk branch of the company "Sukhoi"


Moscow, June 10. Today, at the airport Eltsovka of subsidiary "Sukhoi" - Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named by V.P. Chkalov (NAE), made the first flight of a prototype light multipurpose aircraft, designed and built in the Siberian Research Institute of Aviation named by S.A. Chaplygin. The flight was successful. The plane was piloted by SibNIA chief executive officer - test pilot Vladimir Barsuk.


In the manufacture of large composite-glueing tooling for carbon fiber aircraft parts NAE helped. Details of polymeric composite materials (PCM), which is used in the manufacture of an autoclave SibNIA experts plan to produce composite manufacturing Novosibirsk aircraft plant.


The aircraft structure implemented advanced technology of modern aircraft. The panels of the wing spars and ribs biplane circuit made of carbon fiber. Two new biplane wing made from the composite joined in "bookcase" smooth transition. Unlike the classic biplane wing completely absent brace that will allow a 50% increase in maximum and cruising speed. The minimum airspeed of close to zero has been reached in the first flight. In the short term - the completion of the design and manufacture of fuselage from polymeric composite materials.

Development and construction of prototype aircraft for local airlines to replace the An-2, conducted by a team of SibNIA Aviation Development Programme of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation.


An-2.JPG
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
3,215
Reaction score
963
Website
beyondthesprues.com
Outstanding! There's life in the old girl still.


Any idea re the engine?
 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
489
At the risk of being pedantic, it has composite wings but the fuselage is still constructed from metal. In fact it seems as if this program is a straight re-winging of existing SinNIA aircraft.

Wonder how Antonov responds.

GTX said:
Any idea re the engine?
SinNIA has been refitting their Colts with the Honeywell TPE331, probably what this prototype is using.
 

shedofdread

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
485
Reaction score
146
Oh that's wonderful! :)


I remember, a few years ago, seeing one come over the hedge seemingly at walking pace (quite a breezy day...), touch down and barely roll forward. Lovely old thing.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
433
Moose said:
At the risk of being pedantic, it has composite wings but the fuselage is still constructed from metal. In fact it seems as if this program is a straight re-winging of existing SinNIA aircraft.

Wonder how Antonov responds.

GTX said:
Any idea re the engine?
SinNIA has been refitting their Colts with the Honeywell TPE331, probably what this prototype is using.

Certainly looks like a TPE331, judging by the shape of the air intake, and the single exhaust.
The new wing configuration is almost a box-wing,(just love those funky upturned wingtips) wonder why they the kept the overhanging upper wing tips? Better aileron control, particularly at low speeds?
This aircraft does indeed, have a metal fuselage, however from the post above :-

" In the short term - the completion of the design and manufacture of fuselage from polymeric composite materials."


cheers,
Robin.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
433
Outstanding! There's life in the old girl still.

What next? composite DC-3s? (Boeing 703??)...graphite-epoxy Tiger Moths? ;D


cheers,
Robin.
 

kaiserbill

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
1,466
Reaction score
527
robunos said:
Outstanding! There's life in the old girl still.

What next? composite DC-3s? (Boeing 703??)...graphite-epoxy Tiger Moths? ;D






cheers,
Robin.


I suppose one could think of the various DC-3 turbine upgrade programmes as along these lines.

I've seen it mentioned somewhere that this is actually part of the programme to develop an AN-2 successor, but I wonder if it is now being offered for retrofit to existing An-2's. Translating stuff leads to all sorts of misconceptions.
It makes sense though, as apart from small areas with metal, the AN-2 wings are fabric covered, which is easily damaged, and the new material allows the braces to go, as the article mentions.
 

Silencer1

That now I am the Ruler of the Queen's Navee!
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
642
Reaction score
154
I'm translated the first story by myself, using the Google as addition - I did my best.


Anyway, some mistakes could occur - the initial Russian text contains certain "not-so-obvious" statements.
What's mean "zero speed"? Aircraft hovers in the air?
No designation mentioned - strange, isn't it?
And not a word about wing extensive flaps' system!


This aircraft is an obvious development from the earlier, TPE-powered An-2 biplane (TVS-2MS), and it's high-wing version (TVS-2DT).


Biplane has been described in English on official page of SibNIIA http://sibnia.com/press-center/news/detail.php?ID=71


Monoplane (on Russian) - http://www.take-off.ru/news/134-news02014/896-tvs-2dt-na-kerosine-i-odnom-kryle
According to article on December 2014 14 An-2 airframes has been re-engined by Honeywell TPE331-12UAN turboprops and certain of them is in service already.


SibNIIA site also contain an extensive page about their plans of An-2 development:
http://sibnia.ru/an-2/


I'm sorry to unable at this moment translate all the available text, so if someone interested - let me knew.


I hope, that news about An-2 advanced version would be available soon in international aviation magazines.
 

Attachments

  • an-2_001.jpg
    an-2_001.jpg
    67.4 KB · Views: 306
  • 12_2014_TVS-2DT-1.jpg
    12_2014_TVS-2DT-1.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 309
  • an-2_020.JPG
    an-2_020.JPG
    95.4 KB · Views: 308
  • an-2_008.jpg
    an-2_008.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 291
  • an-2_003d.jpg
    an-2_003d.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 348

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
708
Question: Antonov being a Ukrainian design bureau, what can we make of the fact that a Russian company markets its upgraded version at a time of deep political turmoil between the two countries? Is it dishonest appropriation? Continuation of a deal begun at a time when the situation was not so bad? Just curious.
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
3,215
Reaction score
963
Website
beyondthesprues.com
Given the An-2 was originally designed etc during the days of the USSR isn't it a moot point.
 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
489
Oh I don't know, I imagine if Antonov started reproducing Tu-95s without the Putin Seal of Approval there would be merry hell raised about it.
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
708
GTX said:
Given the An-2 was originally designed etc during the days of the USSR isn't it a moot point.

The point is: who owns the design rights? Have they become public domain?? I should think not. Hence my question. Plus they continue to call it an An-2, not a Sukhoi or SibNIA designation.
 

Avimimus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
1,987
Reaction score
112
I don't see the issue:
- If it is a matter of patent law rather than intellectual property. Are any specific patents violated?
- The An-2 is pretty ubiquitous across Eastern Europe, so after market parts and upgrades are produced in more than one spot. If it is an upgrade kit, then the originator might not need to be paid.
- If they are making a new wing and fuselage and engine and cockpit then it is a new design.

So, the real question: Is the trademark violated? Do Russia and the Ukraine take such an extreme position on trademark law as recent U.S. court rulings have? Does anyone care that much?

At a more symbolic level: Would it be silly to try to avoid using the Antonov name for an upgrade kit? Would it be insulting, petty and disingenuous to not give Antonov some credit for this class of biplane?
 

yasotay

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
1,086
Reminds me of the UH-1. There are so many places rebuilding them and putting new parts on them that they can hardly make a claim to be Bell other than everyone knows they are.

It is good to see such a practical aircraft design have a second lease on life.
 

kaiserbill

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
1,466
Reaction score
527
Moose said:
Oh I don't know, I imagine if Antonov started reproducing Tu-95s without the Putin Seal of Approval there would be merry hell raised about it.


Can we keep personal political speculative opinions out of here please, and reserve that for The Bar.
This site is of a far higher quality than others out there for such reasons.


Silencer, you did a good job. Being a bilingual person myself, I was merely saying that sometimes things don't interpret very well at all between languages.
As such, the original articles, even when translated, don't throw much light on whether this will be an upgrade or new build.
It seems to me, reading between the lines, that there is a project being worked on to replace the An-2, and this "prototype" of an existing airframe with a complete wing replacement seems to be part of that programme, but with the benefit of being able to be retrofitted to existing An-2's.
Sources out there indicate over 18000 An-2's were built, so one would imagine that if the upgrade was cheap enough, there would be a market worth pursuing.


I guess time will tell.
 

Silencer1

That now I am the Ruler of the Queen's Navee!
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
642
Reaction score
154
Uprgrading An-2 is a long-long story.


The first realized attempt was An-3 - and without too much success. In my humble opinions, designers offers to customers (already owning An-2) upgrade, that they just don't need. Lack of suitable engines, then lack of ability to produce the suitable one, etc.
AN-3 maiden flight was in 1980!


On Antonov' company web-page there was huge page about current version of An-3 http://www.antonov.com/aircraft/transport-aircraft/an-3t/an-3t-photo (English text)


There was also another re-engined prototype of An-2 - An-2-100 with Ukrainian MS-14 turboprop
352232325.jpg





So, there were certain attempts - from very simple to the very advanced to revive Antonov An-2.
Although, looks like most of them don't pay too much attention of the current owners requirements - so, winner would be the one, who offered best proposal!


By the way, SibNIIA design, IMHO, looks like attempt to build completely new (and hope, good aircraft) step-by-step eliminating all An-2 parts.
Perhaps, this team wants to build a all-new good turboprop, staying close to successful, although obsolete biplane?


I wish a good luck to all such attempts!


P.S. Kaiserbill, thanks for the kind words!
 

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,494
Reaction score
1,047
The first flight of the experimental TVS-2DTS took place on July 10th, 2017.
 

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
701
Reaction score
372
Now if they could just add a boundary layer control system ;D
 

Avimimus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
1,987
Reaction score
112
sienar said:
Now if they could just add a boundary layer control system ;D

Too much maintenance cost for a bush plane alas.

My desire would've been to see this with retractable landing gear! It would give it a slightly more modern appearance :) But I guess weight was deemed more important than drag?

It is pretty neat to think that a biplane passenger transport might hit production 70 years after the Antonov 2 started production! To think how many claimed it was an out-dated design then!
 

GRach

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
7
Reaction score
5
An-2 with two engines
Project
1:12 scale model
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 34
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 33
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 28
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 27
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 30

GRach

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
7
Reaction score
5
Project 2
Scale 1:12
 

Attachments

  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 31
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 32
  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_20191021_212956.jpg
    IMG_20191021_212956.jpg
    494.7 KB · Views: 28

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
838
GTX said:
Given the An-2 was originally designed etc during the days of the USSR isn't it a moot point.

The point is: who owns the design rights? Have they become public domain?? I should think not. Hence my question. Plus they continue to call it an An-2, not a Sukhoi or SibNIA designation.

Dear stagazer,
I can only answer your question from the perspective of American Federal Air Regulations. Canadian Air Regulations are almost photo-copies of FARs.
The original manufacturer - in this case Antonov - still owns the Type Certificate and Production Certificate.
They may try to discourage after-market modifiers to prevent law suits coming back to haunt them. Trust me, I have 9 years experience with Canadian personal injury lawyers.!
An after-market company must apply for a Supplementary Type Certificate and prove that their product is an improvement on the original's performance. Sometimes STCs only make
maintenance easier.
The other option is FAA Parts Manufacturing Authority. PMA allows after-market companies to build replacement parts to original specifications or higher specifications. For example, numerous DHC-2 Beaver PMA replacement steel parts are available with better corrosion-inhibiting paints.

All this is irrelevant in North America because both the FAA and Transport Canada have refused to certify AN-2 for commercial operations. The handful of AN-2s imported to North America fly on experimental or restricted Certificates of Airworthiness. TC won't certify them because they cannot access production records from when they were built under Soviet military contracts.
 

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
838
GTX said:
Given the An-2 was originally designed etc during the days of the USSR isn't it a moot point.

The point is: who owns the design rights? Have they become public domain?? I should think not. Hence my question. Plus they continue to call it an An-2, not a Sukhoi or SibNIA designation.

Dear stagazer,
I can only answer your question from the perspective of American Federal Air Regulations perspective. Canadian Air Regulations are almost photo-copies of FARs.
The original manufacturer - in this case Antonov - still owns the Type Certificate and Production Certificate.
They may try to discourage after-market modifiers to prevent law suits coming back to haunt them. Trust me, I have 9 years experience with Canadian personal injury lawyers.!
An after-market company must apply for a Supplementary Type Certificate and prove that their product is an improvement on the original's performance. Sometimes STCs only make
maintenance easier.
The other option is FAA Parts Manufacturing Authority. PMA allows after-market companies to build replacement parts to original specifications or higher specifications. For example, numerous DHC-2 Beaver PMA replacement steel parts are available with better corrosion-inhibiting paints.
 

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
838
If they hope to sell significant numbers of new airframes, Siberians will need to configure doors and cabin interior to accommodate LD3 baggage containers. Over-night courier companies (DHL, Fedex, etc.) are shifting to LD3 containers because they be loaded quicker with less man-power.
The latest Firecatcher F-45 and Cessna 408 Skycourier are both configured to carry a trio of LD3 containers.
Skycourier looks like a fat DHC-6 Twin Otter, while F-45 looks like a fat Cessna 208 Caravan.
 

Similar threads

Top