I think they meant this one,the Model on the right ?.SECM 540 was just a wing design
Via my dear Tophe,and from TU 128.
______________________________________Projects and achievements:
SECM 20 to 26:
Designed by engineer Bouchenot, models 20 to 26 represented a series of biplanes intended for school or touring. The SECM 20, baptized Lutèce, was presented at the 1921 Salon. A side-by-side two-seater, it was fitted with a 110 hp Rhone 9J rotary engine. The type 21 never flew due to the absence of its 150 hp Farman engine, development of which was abandoned.
The model 22, presented at the 1922 Salon, was produced in three copies. It received a 150 hp Hispano Suiza HS 8As engine. The SECM 23 (180 hp HS 8Ac engine) was a three-seat sesquiplane. One example was built and registered F-ESEF. The SECM 23 destroyed in a Cherbourg landing accident in 1924.
The model 24 was intended for training. A tandem-set biplane, it was equipped with a Rhône 9c engine of 80 hp. The example produced was used until 1930 by the STAé.
The SECM 25, intended to be powered by a Salmson 9Ac 120 hp engine, was not built.
The last model of the series, the type 26, had been designed to a 1923 school training the program - category EP2 (École Pilotage double commande). Endowed with an 80 hp Rhône 9c, the type 26 was not a successful candidate.
As in reply # 29,it was just a float seaplane version of Amiot-120.120S was a seaplane or flying boat Project,maybe developed from Type-110S ?
As in reply # 29,it was just a float seaplane version of Amiot-120.120S was a seaplane or flying boat Project,maybe developed from Type-110S ?
Unknown was early 1939 design of seaplane, transatlantic, with 8 diesel engines CLM Junkers of
500 hp coupled 2 by 2 and driving contra-rotating propellers
We forget this Project.
Hello from Germany,
I've just discovered in the issues of JAWA's 1928-1930, the Amiot 101 C1 Single-Seat fighter. This a/c is in most other publications the Amiot 110 C1. But why should they use the same number for completely different aircraft (Amiot 110 C1 Fighter, Amiot 110 S Seaplane).
Could that be possible, that Jane's did the same mistake for a wrong number for 3 years?
From Aviation magazine 1962.
A mystery,it was Amiot-364 ?!.
This mention under the Amiot 143 entry is erroneous, as there was not "Amiot 132". You were referring to the Amiot 142 M4.- Original order was for Amiot 132 M4 variant
- 148: (??) hypothetical designation