SAAB m/42 Bombsight

Wurger

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
25 October 2007
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
241
Hi guys,

does anyone have pics of this bombsight, a revolutionary item that permitted "toss bombing"?. It was developed by Erik Wilkenson after an earlier Askania design. Later was used even by the USAF.
 
Hans G Andersson mentions SAAB's m/42 bombsight as BT-2 'toss-bomb computer' when used in the SAAB 17 and as BT-9 when used in its developed form in the SAAB 18 and the SAAB 21 (SAAB aircraft since 1937, Putnam, 1997).
I found one picture of a BT-9 in a SAAB A21 attack aircraft in Bo Widfeldt's 'Profile 138: The SAAB 21 A&R'.
<edit> replaced pic with smaller pic because resolution wasn't that good </edit>
 

Attachments

  • saab bt-9.JPG
    saab bt-9.JPG
    73.1 KB · Views: 188
Hello Arjen,
many thanks for that pic. Impressive bombsight. I believe that, at this point of development (BT-9), it already carries some features present in, say, the British designed gyro gunsight (the selector, used in fighters to select ennemi aircraft span).
Anything more :D ?
 
Anything more
cheesy.gif
?
I'm afraid not. Andersson and Widfeldt just mention the sight, they don't mention any details about it. I knew I had a picture of the thing somewhere, finding it took some time.
 
As a matter of fact, Hans G Andersson does have more to say :-[
A Revolutionary Bombsight

The Swedish Air Force was one of the pioneers of dive-bombing, starting in 1934 using the Hawker Hart (B 4) and later the Northrop 8A-1 (B 5). The Air Force was also well aware of the limitations of dive-bombing, especially the bomber's vulnerability against anti-aircraft fire and fighters. Saab took a great interest in the problem and in the early 1940s two engineers, Erik Wilkenson and Torsten Faxén, solved the problem, which eventually resulted in the efficiency of the Swedish bomber/attack aircraft. In contrast to the steep - up to 90 degrees - dives used by the German Stukas, the new bombsight allowed shallow dive angles (20-30 degrees) and with automatic bomber separation during the pull-out. The bombsight, which was developed under strict secrecy, was a mechanical computer - one of the first of its kind in the world - using target-data input from the sighting phase. The sighting system permitted moderate altitudes to be used before the final diving phase thereby considerably reducing the time of exposure to anti-aircraft fire and fighter defence.
The first production 'toss' bombsight, the BT 2, went into the B 17. A later design, the BT 9, went into the B 18 and was also used in the A 21A. After the Second World War, new mixed mechanical/electronic versions were developed, sold to and even licence-produced in the United States. The BT 9 was also exported in sizable numbers to France, Denmark and Switzerland. The last Swedish aircraft to carry the BT 9C was the Saab 32 Lansen first introduced into service in 1955. Saab produced nearly 2,000 sights not including US licence production or 'pirate versions' produced there after the Swedish patents expired. The BT 9 represented Saab's first major equipment development programme outside the traditional aircraft design area. The development of the first Saab pilot-ejector seat used in a production-type aircraft as early as 1943 was another contemporary technical milestone.
 
Peter C. Smith cites Erik Wilkenson in his book 'The History of Dive Bombing', Pen and Sword Aviation, 2007:
Dive-bombing became my greatest interest from 1940 onwards. As a matter of fact we had a flying test model of our equipment as soon as nine months after the original idea, i.e. we flew and made test bombing in August 1940. From late 1942 all aircraft from Saab were equipped. It is true that we were very isolated from foreign developments in dive-bombing, not only during the hostilities but for a long period after 1945.
A period of experimenting began in summer 1940, with the definite object of building a trial model of the bombing instrument. In a small laboratory which had been equipped for the purpose, we studied the possibilities of carrying out the various suggestions for the solution of the technical detail problems, and under Mr Faxén, the designing of the trial instruments began.
Many difficulties were encountered. The rapid change of altitude and speed in the dive made great demands on the immediate reaction of the instrument. Various causes for time delays were therefore carefully studied, but only after producing a few interesting inventions of details did we obtain the basic conditions for achieving accuracy in spite of temperature changes, vibrations and external acceleration.
From the outset the air tests proved that the fundamental idea was correct, namely, that the pilot could accurately and easily direct his aircraft towards the target in a medium-steep dive and that the pull-out from the dive could be made in the calculated manner. Until these preliminary tests had been made, it was of course impossible to determine whether this bombing method would be practicable. The functioning of the trial instrument was first checked by electric measuring devices and lamps, which registered the bomb-release during pull-out. When the results appeared favourable, the first releases of practice bombs were begun. The results showed well-concentrated hits, which promised well for the future.
[...]
An attack according to the new method would be as follows. The pilot dives the aeroplane straight toward the target, aiming by means of a fixed sight approximately in alignment with the direction of flight. He presses a button and begins the pull-out, i.e. recovery from the dive. An automatic instrument measures the various factors influencing the proper release and gives the impulse, which releases the bomb at just that moment in the pull-out when the aircraft attains the correct attitude for release. The pilot is the only person concerned in the process and it is easy for him to align the sight because it is approximately in the direction of flight toward the target, and then to end the dive with a sufficiently correct pull-out. The instrument can be designed to cope with wide variations of dive angle, height of release, speed, etc., which also facilitates operation for the pilot. The possibility of variation in the choice of elements of air is also advantageous from the point of view of tactics, as is also the fact that the time required for aiming can be very short, can be preceded by evasive manoeuvres, and is also automatically followed by an evasive movement, the pull-out.
The curvature of the bomb trajectory is compensated by the change of direction of motion of the aircraft during the pull-out. The pilot's view forwards and downwards, which is very often limited by the structure of the aeroplane, does not need to be utilised for a movable sight line, and the pilot accordingly has a good field of view round all sides of the target at the moment of attack.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/History-Dive-Bombing-Comprehensive-Onward/dp/1844155927/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1311182376&sr=1-1
 
Great, Arjen,
thanks for this. Unfortunatelly there seems to be a big lack of pictures :( .
 
Back
Top Bottom