Republic AP-54, AP-55 fighters

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,445
Reaction score
7,115
Republic AP-54, AP-55, from Aviation Week 5th December 1958, via Tony Buttler.
 

Attachments

  • AP-54.jpg
    AP-54.jpg
    68.5 KB · Views: 1,173
  • AP-55.jpg
    AP-55.jpg
    64.1 KB · Views: 1,075

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
303
AP-54 is clearly derived from the radar-nosed version of the XP-91. Interestingly enough, the last time I saw the remaining one at the USAF Museum, it had the radar nose and the V-tail.
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
498
Wow!!!...Today it's Republic's Day at Secretprojects :: :eek:

I have been looking for this models for a long time...but now I'm troubled. According to my sources AP-55 was suposed to be Republic's submission against Lockheed Starfighter and Northrop Fang. Am I wrong if I say that AP-55 in the photo doesn't looks very much as a Mach 2 fighter ???
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,445
Reaction score
7,115
Its wings are highly swept, reminiscent of the F-105, which was Mach 2 capable, so I wouldn't discount the possibility.
 

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
303
AP-55 's inlets look very similar to the F-105A's inlets. I seem to remember that was a Mach 2 aircraft, so this that wouldn't be out of range for this one.
 

Tophe

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
48
Website
cmeunier.chez-alice.fr
Thanks for this post of the twin-boom AP-55 that I did not know... :)
Supersonic twin-boomers have not "existed" but many projects have been designed: a DH-110 derivative, a twin-fuselage in Tony Buttler's English Fighters book, the P.1216 candidate to what became the Typhoon II...
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
498
Dear Friends, thanks a lot for the comments.
I'm not an engineer so it was not clear for me that this could be the tipycal shape for a Mach 2 interceptor: rounded nose and no area ruled fuselage...but Northrop's Fang had a similar nose and was a Mach 2 performer.

Please let me show a little comment:
I seem to remember that (F-105) was a Mach 2 aircraft

I thought the same of you, Evan and Paul, but according to "The American Fighter" by Angelucci & Bowers the Thud's max speed at 33,000 ft was 857 mph (1,379 Km/h) which it's below 1.5 Mach.


And the last question: what are this "things" in the wing tips of AP-54?. Too slim to be a fuel tank....
 
O

Overkiller

Guest
And the last question: what are this "things" in the wing tips of AP-54?. Too slim to be a fuel tank....



[/quote]

Anti flutter masses?
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,445
Reaction score
7,115
Pometablava: thats definitely incorrect. An F-105B flew at Mach 2.15 during testing, according to "The Thunder Factory".
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,299
Reaction score
206
I thought the same of you, Evan and Paul, but according to "The American Fighter" by Angelucci & Bowers the Thud's max speed at 33,000 ft was 857 mph (1,379 Km/h) which it's below 1.5 Mach.

Probably with external loads/tanks? ???
 

Antonio

Moderator
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
498
Pometablava: thats definitely incorrect. An F-105B flew at Mach 2.15 during testing, according to "The Thunder Factory".

Thanks a lot for the info, Paul :D, and very bad for Angeluzzi/Bowers book because it is a very big mistake :mad:
 

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
303
Skybolt said:
I thought the same of you, Evan and Paul, but according to "The American Fighter" by Angelucci & Bowers the Thud's max speed at 33,000 ft was 857 mph (1,379 Km/h) which it's below 1.5 Mach.

Probably with external loads/tanks? ???

I'd hazard a guess that it's with maximum external loads/tanks, but in regard to weight and to drag. From what I've read, the F-105 was one of only two aircraft capable of supersonic performance "on the deck", the other was the A/RA-5.
 

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
60
The "things" on the wings of AP-54 were to be attachment points for a canceled parasite fighter program.
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,225
Reaction score
804
A small pic, but it is worth adding here for the sake of completion.
 

Attachments

  • ap-55.jpg
    ap-55.jpg
    2.6 KB · Views: 1,238

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
60
I recently found this desktop model image of the Republic AP-55 online. Enjoy! -SP
 

Attachments

  • Republic AP-55.JPG
    Republic AP-55.JPG
    46.6 KB · Views: 994

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,225
Reaction score
804
Steve Pace said:
I recently found this desktop model image of the Republic AP-55 online. Enjoy! -SP

Brilliant!!! Such a cool design... Thanks a lot for this.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,812
Reaction score
115
There are two crisp color illustrations -aircraft model photo- about
both the AP-54 and AP-55 in:

Secret U.S.Proposals of the Cold War - Jim Keeshen.
(p.109 & .p.113)
 

ivran

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
14
Does somebody have a 3 view of AP-54 and AP.55 interesning design
 

ivran

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
14
Still try to found any new information about this lovely airplane projects, 3 view, pictures or dimensions, AP-54, is very close with F-105, but AP-55, is unknown project,
Great regards for all members
 

Stargeneral410

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
26
Reaction score
16
AP-55 's inlets look very similar to the F-105A's inlets. I seem to remember that was a Mach 2 aircraft, so this that wouldn't be out of range for this one.
AP-54 design might make sense to me. But can anyone explain me the AP-55 tail design? It gave a lot of questions about the reason for designer's choice of this strange twin broom tail. It looks pretty unstable to me and bring a lot of concerns that the tail might break apart itself if travelling at Mach 2 speed. The plane might be in a disadvantage situation if tthe enemy plane damaged it tail.
 

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,572
Reaction score
1,054
All airplanes are at a disadvantage after the enemy shoots off their tails!
Hah!
Hah!

Seriously, inverted V-tails have some handling advantages at lower airspeeds. For example, I was just looking at an American Eaglet light sailplane over on www.homebuiltairplanes.com. Eaglet's pilot sits in a teardrop pod and a single boom extends back to the inverted-V tail. In steep turns (e.g. spiraling in a thermal) most light planes need a bit of inside rudder and some up elevator. Inverted-V tails naturally combine those two control inputs.
 

Wyvern

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
892
Reaction score
1,129
Can this project trace its ancestry back to the F-84 and F-84F (XF-91 to a stretch)? Does it eventually lead to the F-105?
 

Similar threads

Top