ProjectFear alleged Boeing NGAD F-47 demonstrator video - June 2026

Genuine question for the people that are more familiar than me with this sort of equipment.

When the shots with both cameras (IR and white phosphor night vision) are shown side by side, there is a lot more clouds in the IR shot that don't seem to match with the ones visible in the other camera:

There is also a lot more stars visible in the background of the aircraft (the bright light) flying than I would expect to see, since the IR view appears to be significantly more cloudy.

Is this reasonable to expect since the 2 cameras work differently?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 22-03-06 ​We Filmed a Top Secret Craft Flying at Area 51 - YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 22-03-06 ​We Filmed a Top Secret Craft Flying at Area 51 - YouTube.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 297
Last edited by a moderator:
BDF said:
Or the when the F-47 is finally seen in the public and it's very different or nearly the same in planform. That would be a strong indicator if this video is authentic. It me it's odd you didn't hear it at all...
Click to expand...
In 2028 we will be fixed .
 
BDF said:
Or the when the F-47 is finally seen in the public and it's very different or nearly the same in planform. That would be a strong indicator if this video is authentic. It me it's odd you didn't hear it at all...
Click to expand...
There is no reason to not be authentic, Game with the Camo Dude , 4 nights in the desert , it have no interest for a you tube Chanel to make Fake to ruined the Chanel.
 
I'm a sucker for aircraft videos, fake or not.
(A recent favorite, but I digress.)
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oaqWO7UklUE

With that disclaimer, I think the Project_Fear boys may have filmed the "YF-45D", as mentioned on the resume of CDR Raymond Marshall, VX-9 at Nellis. Most likely a deliberate fly-by, reminiscent of the Wichita and Amarillo daylight sightings following the 2014 Crimea invasion.
 
Wel that's a dumb assertion. Let's talk night time flight, particularly military.

For starters, IFR flight plans should be filed for all flights to the maximum extent possible. This here im sure is no exception to that rule, this aircraft was most likely in a landing configuration as that also coincides with the "helicopter" like speed. A dirty configuration at night with gear down will always be accompanied with a landing light. Which is why the guy said "ERMAHGERD IT JUST DISAPPEARED" Yes, no shit, it turned away onto a different heading of whatever profile it was on. Believing he was flying under instruments is a grossly large assumption, the level turn as it appears in landing configuration reminds me of RNAV approaches like what I listed below. Also note how bright the landing light is. Not a hat trick, just business as usual.
 

Attachments

  • images (5).jpeg
    images (5).jpeg
    10.6 KB · Views: 104
  • images (4).jpeg
    images (4).jpeg
    8.9 KB · Views: 70
  • little-known-fact-navigraph-navdata-contains-the-rnp-13l-v0-k2tx1qdgryrc1.jpeg
    little-known-fact-navigraph-navdata-contains-the-rnp-13l-v0-k2tx1qdgryrc1.jpeg
    311.4 KB · Views: 85
BDF said:
it's clearly the landing light. He's talking straight out of his ass...
Click to expand...

We all know that top-secret stealth aircraft always carry an array of high-intensity spotlight packages. It is standard doctrine to brightly illuminate yourself in the night sky to ensure you can effectively hide in the dark.
 

Attachments

  • 1780714047198.png
    1780714047198.png
    783.6 KB · Views: 165
Reddington777 said:
Nah. Works too busy these days and I dont have the energy to spend. When we actually see the real thing though I will
Click to expand...

I would like to point out that while those of us that work to move the needle forward parasites like TWZ, the “aviationist” and other profit from our efforts and while we deal with real world problems like paying bills.

Gosh, under the law governing the conduct of TWZ how much work product are they liable for? In California just under my posts my legal gram has calculated… a lot.
 
quellish said:
Gosh, under the law governing the conduct of TWZ how much work product are they liable for? In California just under my posts my legal gram has calculated… a lot.
Click to expand...
Doesnt willful IP infringement like TWZ does come with greatly increased damages by statute? Not to mention the RICO tripled damages, since they've been sued AND LOST for this crap at least 3 times in the past?

Got a friendly-ish lawyer? Remember to ask for legal fees separately from damages, even if lawyer is taking payments as a % of the damages.
 
Why can't we hear the sound of the engines? Any thoughts？Assuming this video is authentic.
 
If you don't use the full-size demo version, you can only change other directions, such as the CCA drone."dog head"
 

Attachments

  • Image_1780689137710.jpg
    Image_1780689137710.jpg
    182.4 KB · Views: 198
  • IMG_20260606_011424.jpg
    IMG_20260606_011424.jpg
    255.4 KB · Views: 205
Do we know for sure that the demonstrator has two engines? I have read that it is "full scale", but not sure what that implies.
 
quellish said:
I would like to point out that while those of us that work to move the needle forward parasites like TWZ, the “aviationist” and other profit from our efforts and while we deal with real world problems like paying bills.

Gosh, under the law governing the conduct of TWZ how much work product are they liable for? In California just under my posts my legal gram has calculated… a lot.
Click to expand...

Lets be honest here. Even if there wasn't a TWZ or others to popularize the subject, the readership would barely cross triple digits. The subject matter is far below the popularity of horticulture or even dirt collecting. Yesterdays "the right stuff" is today's "disclosure".
 
Sferrin said:
Wow, an hour and a half video for a few seconds of "footagE". I ain't wadin' through that.
Click to expand...
It could be a Lockheed bird instead of a F-47 demonstrator ? We know that Lockheed work on something highly classified since years.
 
Flyaway said:
I had one of them as well, great toy, was a childhood favourite. Always wondered where it went, now I know it’s flying over Area 51.
Click to expand...

"Baby, if you've ever wondered,
Wondered, whatever became of me,
I'm flying in the air over Nevada,
Nevada, Area 51.

"Got kinda tired of packin' and unpackin'
Base to base, up and down the range
Maybe you and me were never meant to be,

"Just maybe think of me once in a while.

"I'm over Area 51 in Nevada"
 
tico said:
Why can't we hear the sound of the engines? Any thoughts？Assuming this video is authentic.
Click to expand...
The back ground noise masked everything, including the guys talking in some parts of the video.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom