Privatizing Space - An Illustrated History of The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight

archipeppe

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
18 October 2007
Messages
2,435
Reaction score
3,165
I'm pleased and excited to announce my next book, realized with my friend and co-author Davide Sivolella, with the forewords of Felix Schlang of the famous WAI Channel:

Privatizing Space: An Illustrated History of The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight.

In a single volume, you will embark on a thrilling journey of how major and lesser-known launcher and spacecraft manufacturers have devoted their resources to bring forward a vision of profit by rapid innovation offering transportation services from LEO through cis-lunar space and beyond Earth’s sphere of influence.

It will be released by Springer-Praxis the next July.


1746292520348.png
 
I'm pleased and excited to announce my next book, realized with my friend and co-author Davide Sivolella, with the forewords of Felix Schlang of the famous WAI Channel:

Privatizing Space: An Illustrated History of The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight.
Looks cool, but... "The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight" just doesn't ring right. "Quest FOR," perhaps, but "Quest TO" seems a bit odd to me. I guess if you consider "quest" as in "journey," then a "journey to such and such" makes sense...
 
Looks cool, but... "The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight" just doesn't ring right. "Quest FOR," perhaps, but "Quest TO" seems a bit odd to me. I guess if you consider "quest" as in "journey," then a "journey to such and such" makes sense...
The actual title isa Springer-Praxis choice....
The title we originally proposed was "Space Privatization, from Jules Verne to Elon Musk".
 
Last edited:
Looks cool, but... "The Quest to Affordable and Profitable Spaceflight" just doesn't ring right. "Quest FOR," perhaps, but "Quest TO" seems a bit odd to me. I guess if you consider "quest" as in "journey," then a "journey to such and such" makes sense...
Shouldn't it then be "Trek to. . ." ;)
 
The Gun Club was a private organization but got their Moon shot funded by worlwide governments (from memory : urbi et orbi, like the Pope says).
 
The Gun Club was a private organization but got their Moon shot funded by worlwide governments (from memory : urbi et orbi, like the Pope says).
Yes, it is true.
But we liked the Verne's idea that it was private driver motion.
 
The actual title isa Springer-Praxis choice....
The title we originally proposed was "Space Privatization, from Jules Verne to Elon Musk".

Please don't take this the wrong way, but the new title is far better. As a working book editor, we make such decisions all the time. Too often, authors lack marketing and presentation experience. Think of it this way. Your audience is not just the specialist. Book publishers want maximum sales and even if the secondary buyers make up only 2 to 5% that's still 2 to 5% of additional sales.

I don't know what research materials you used, so I post the following for all reading.


 
Please don't take this the wrong way, but the new title is far better. As a working book editor, we make such decisions all the time. Too often, authors lack marketing and presentation experience. Think of it this way. Your audience is not just the specialist. Book publishers want maximum sales and even if the secondary buyers make up only 2 to 5% that's still 2 to 5% of additional sales.

I don't know what research materials you used, so I post the following for all reading.


Definitely right.
That's why we left Springer-Praxis team doing its job.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom