Navy Seeks Rail Guns, Lasers, Cruise Missiles To Improve Pacific Firepower

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
121
moonbeamsts said:
The problem of the TWS system is they are trying to eliminate the sonar operator and make it a totally standalone system. They have made progress but are throwing it out due its taking to long ,
Don't worry. I'm sure it will get done sooner if they do nothing long enough.
 

jsport

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
4
sferrin said:
moonbeamsts said:
The problem of the TWS system is they are trying to eliminate the sonar operator and make it a totally standalone system. They have made progress but are throwing it out due its taking to long ,
Don't worry. I'm sure it will get done sooner if they do nothing long enough.
Always the same... when is anyone held accountable ..contractor-civilian- service.
When do we hear "your fired" early in a program.
RWRs used have excessive falses, for instance.
Commenters like to say in the modern world things are so complicated it is hard to discern who is culpable. It is funny after somebody gets fired the problem usually finds a way to get fixed.
 

marauder2048

"I should really just relax"
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
25
moonbeamsts said:
The problem of the TWS system is they are trying to eliminate the sonar operator and make it a totally standalone system. They have made progress but are throwing it out due its taking to long , The navy did the same thing with new sonar fire control AnBSY-1 back in the 80"s 90"s.
Not so unreasonable given that in the more chaotic acoustic environments a human operator will tend towards
false negatives due to task saturation.

Unless at-sea reload is impossible (or a CAT has the range to hit one of the escorts) a
highish false positive rate might be tolerable.
 

jsport

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
4
If not a multi-spectral synthetic aperture sonar, magnetic anomaly and LIDAR then it will have high falses.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
121
jsport said:
If not a multi-spectral synthetic aperture sonar, magnetic anomaly and LIDAR then it will have high falses.
Would any of those work in a wake-homer situation. Where you have a lot of bubbles mixed in with the water, for a significant distance, it would seem to be a perfect place for such a torpedo to hide as it's sneaking up. The MAD might work (if the torp wasn't degaussed) but I don't see how either of the other two could penetrate the wake.
 

jsport

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
4
sferrin said:
jsport said:
If not a multi-spectral synthetic aperture sonar, magnetic anomaly and LIDAR then it will have high falses.
Would any of those work in a wake-homer situation. Where you have a lot of bubbles mixed in with the water, for a significant distance, it would seem to be a perfect place for such a torpedo to hide as it's sneaking up. The MAD might work (if the torp wasn't degaussed) but I don't see how either of the other two could penetrate the wake.

Are not all these Sensors change detection sensors and wakes sure cause sized quantifiable change.
 

marauder2048

"I should really just relax"
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
25
sferrin said:
Would any of those work in a wake-homer situation. Where you have a lot of bubbles mixed in with the water, for a significant distance, it would seem to be a perfect place for such a torpedo to hide as it's sneaking up. The MAD might work (if the torp wasn't degaussed) but I don't see how either of the other two could penetrate the wake.
Aren't the towed arrays typically towed at depths below (and maybe beyond) the wake?
 
Top