Forest Green
ACCESS: USAP
- Joined
- 11 June 2019
- Messages
- 14,596
- Reaction score
- 31,708
I will be impressed when it can operate Nap of the Earth (NOE). Big things flying at altitude close(er) to the frontlines does not strike me as survivable. However, if it can stay out of the Weapons Effects Zones (WEZ) of the threat air defenses and accomplish the aero-scout mission, it ought to be considered.
Here's another version:
https://breakingdefense.com/2025/05...-us-army-combining-offices-and-cutting-roles/
Basically, M10 is dead, no more Humvee or JLTV procurement, AH-64D is divested (not clear if there would be more AH-64E). Grey Eagle is gone.
No more AH-64..
Some of that seems justified…it seems unlikely some of those systems would be survivable in a peer conflict. But what are all the trucks going to be replaced with?
Some of that seems justified…it seems unlikely some of those systems would be survivable in a peer conflict. But what are all the trucks going to be replaced with?
Not all of them. 50% of the Apaches in the divisions are gone with the demise of the Air Cavalry Squadron. The remaining attack battalions will see a reduction to make room for UAV. UAV that don't have 30mm, 2.75 inch rockets, nor Hellfire/JAGM. UAV with a ~.85% probability of completing one mission. I'm sure it will be fine. YouTube says so.The Es hang around.
Killing AMPV seems incredibly dumb. We should probably make a thread for this specifically, I suppose.
How far will those plans get though, I wonder?Amid shakeup, Army plans to replace Gray Eagle and Shadow drones
Probably far enough to retire the existing aircraft, build a prototype or two of potential replacement designs, and then cancel the entire effort leaving the Army with nothing if FTUAS, RCV, and FARA are any precedent.How far will those plans get though, I wonder?