• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Lunex Lifting Body Reentry

airrocket

Dreams To Reality
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
290
Reaction score
11
Website
RetroFlight.com
Any info on the USAF LUNEX lifting body reentry technique? Was it related to "negative lifting body for orbital capture"? Modern day engineers seem to have forgotten accomplishments of past generations. Seems we can't think out side the "capsule box" these days? What superb flexible design Lunex was. The lifting body would have been an excellent LEO transfer vehicle as well (dual role).
 

Attachments

  • lunex2d.jpg
    lunex2d.jpg
    76.3 KB · Views: 164
  • Lunex Cutaway.jpg
    Lunex Cutaway.jpg
    45.6 KB · Views: 165

Howedar

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
58
Reaction score
2
airrocket said:
Modern day engineers seem to have forgotten accomplishments of past generations. Seems we can't think out side the "capsule box" these days?
That's unfortunately very much a political concern, not an engineering one. Legacy Apollo technology is seen by TPTB as a safe bet, and the additional capability of a lifting re-entry is difficult to explain without that nasty thing called math.
 

Michel Van

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,084
Reaction score
1,611
more on LUNEX
http://www.astronautix.com/articles/lunex.htm

i found this in LUNEX.PDF
http://www.astronautix.com/data/lunex.pdf

the 1961 USAF Lunex report
4.2.1.1
Present deslgn studies have estimated the total re-entry vehicle weight at 20,205 pounds.
a. Body 7500 pounds
(1) Structure 3500
(2) Heat Shield 4000
b. Wing Group 2000
(1) Structure 800
(2) Heat Shield 1200
....

Present re-entry and recovery techniques are outgrovths of the ballistic missile program utilising ballistic re-entry and parachute recovery.
They are not compatible vlth the velocities associated with re-entry from the moon, vlth controlled
landing, or vith manned operation.
Present engineering data associated vith high speed re-entry is not adequate for vehicle design.

4.2.1.3
A development-test program is required to obtain generalized data on re-entry phenomena and to test scale models.
of selected vehicle configurations so that final selection and design of an optimum vehicle can be made. Concurrently with this test program the projects within the applied research program will be directed so as to carry out the following investigations to provide necessary data for the Lunex Re-entry Vehicle Design.

with simpel words:
they had no idea wat to use ::)
 

airrocket

Dreams To Reality
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
290
Reaction score
11
Website
RetroFlight.com
Great pdf....the old guys knew how to do it. That technique may have came after Lunex. I've herd a technique was studied, those who developed it have passed on now. And seem to have have taken it to the grave with them....
 

Michel Van

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,084
Reaction score
1,611
USAF made unmanned X-23A (under PRIME program) test in 1966
prime.jpg

http://www.astronautix.com/craft/prime.htm

The structure was completely covered with a Martin-developed ablative heat shield 20 to 70 mm (¾ to 2¾ inches) thick, though the nose cap was constructed of carbon-phenolic.
from Wiki

i think, if LUNEX had go ahead, they had taken the lifting body configuration SV-5D (X-23) with carbon-phenolic heat shield.
but that only my opinion
 

Similar threads

Top