Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)

After reading about the Lynx MOSA.ic framework I got a question guys.I'm quite puzzled about what had actually changed inside the processor instruction set during the shifting from TR-2 to TR-3.
 
Anyone have ever seem anything about the EF-35 concept?
QQ20260302-101838.png
I can remember there was a dedicated EW variant of F-35 concept but now the only evidence I can found is this image, and it is from an article that was translated into chinese, published in 2009. Try searching "EF-35" on all searching engine returns with nothing. Are there anyone have more information?
 
Jeff K.Hwang said:
Anyone have ever seem anything about the EF-35 concept?

I can remember there was a dedicated EW variant of F-35 concept but now the only evidence I can found is this image, and it is from an article that was translated into chinese, published in 2009. Try searching "EF-35" on all searching engine returns with nothing. Are there anyone have more information?
Click to expand...
There was a plan to integrate the NGJ onto the F-35 but that plan was dropped in 2012, https://www.flightglobal.com/in-foc...egration-deferred-indefinitely/105240.article

It was the USMC that was most keen but their work with the XQ-58 in recent years shows they have moved on,
The XQ-58A’s advanced EA payload autonomously detected, identified, and geolocated multiple tactically relevant targets of interest, transmitted emitter target track coordinates to collaborative assets, and successfully presented non-kinetic electronic attack effects against multiple emitters.
Click to expand...
uasmagazine.com

Kratos Demonstrates XQ-58A Electronic Warfare Capabilities for United States Marine Corps | UAS Magazine

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. announced that Kratos Unmanned Systems Division has successfully demonstrated the ability of the XQ-58A to fly in
uasmagazine.com uasmagazine.com
 
The Yak-130 can carry R-73/74 with the addition of external hardpoints but that is about it really.
 
EmoBirb said:
Calling the Yak-130 a fighter is a bit of a stretch
Click to expand...

FighterJock said:
The Yak-130 can carry R-73/74 with the addition of external hardpoints but that is about it really.
Click to expand...

"...
However, the Yak-130 also has nine hard points: two wingtip, six under-wing and one beneath the centre fuselage. It can carry a wide range of modern weapons and other stores, including external wing combat fuel tanks, bombs weighing up to 500kg (1,100lb), TV homing/cockpit-displayed guided bombs, rockets, a twin 23mm gun pod, R-73 infrared-homing air-to-air missiles, and electronic countermeasures pods and chaff and flare dispensers, up to a maximum combat load of 3,000kg.
The type also has a head-up display (HUD) and a helmet-mounted sighting system (HMSS) with a double GPS/GLONASS receiver updating a laser ring gyro inertial navigation system for highly accurate navigation and precision targeting. This transforms its capability into a highly potent light ground attack/fighter.
... "

www.flightglobal.com

FLIGHT TEST: Yak-130 proves versatility

YAK ATTACK Irkut's Yak-130 is en route to Russia to showcase the skills of a newly integrated national aerospace industry at a global level. But how...
www.flightglobal.com www.flightglobal.com
 
If it was they would have had it on the Pentagon briefing that happened earlier on today UK time which was fascinating to watch.
 
Sandboxx has a short video out about Israel's first air-to-air victory with its' F-35I:


An Israeli F-35I has reportedly scored the platform’s first air-to-air victory against a crewed aircraft, downing an Iranian Yak-130 over Tehran. While F-35s from multiple nations have shot down uncrewed drones in combat before, this marks the first air-to-air victory against a piloted aircraft for the most technologically advanced fighter in service today.​
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Nice find zjz. Interesting to see the gun door being open when the gun is being fired.
 
Deltafan said:
30 F-35s, instead of 36, for Switzerland, due to additional costs.
Click to expand...

www.defensenews.com

Patriot production delays prompt Switzerland to seek European air-defense fallback

The country will also buy fewer Lockheed Martin F-35 jets than initially planned after unit costs of the fighter increased.
www.defensenews.com www.defensenews.com

Same story, price for 36 airframes has risen by 1.1bn Swiss Francs (around 18%) so they will order 30 airframes which will still require a 400m increase on the original budget. That's a contract price increase per airframe of around 116m Swiss Francs ($150m per airframe).

also Switzerland been told the Patriot they ordered will be delivered 4-5 years late (and that was in Feb before the Middle East conflict) so they are shopping for a complementary buy of a European air defence system.
 
Last edited:
WatcherZero said:
also Switzerland been told the Patriot they ordered will be delivered 4-5 years late (and that was in Feb before the Middle East conflict) so they are shopping for a complementary buy of a European air defence system.
Click to expand...
The Swiss ordered 5 IRIS-T SLM systems last year to cover their medium range requirement. If they want long range, then they pretty much have to go for SAMP/T, if they want to bolster their medium range capability, then IRIS-T SLM probably has it locked in,
 
So what would Switzerland buy instead of buying the original order of 36 F-35s?
 
That is weird GTX, Switzerland getting less F-35s when the rest of Europe is putting more money into defence spending.
 
They have committed verbally to order more later. The order is capped by the budgetary envelope that was submitted to public approval (direct vote). I think it´s perfectly normal for a democracy to conform itself by the words of a public decision. This does not put a shadow on the F-35 or their supporters in Switzerland but, on the contrary, to the naysayers there that have locked the debate in a stalemate with a rhetorical offensive of empty words, complacently forgetting, for many, how Swiss Dassault Mirage III bill broke the ceiling then by many thousand miles, for example, and how defense spendings scarcely meet preapproval budgets (especially when contracts subtilities are not fully understood by people in charge of negotiations).

Let see when neighbor's France acts similarly ;)
 
Last edited:
That is good news that Switzerland are keeping the option to buy more F-35s for later TomcatVIP.
 
Deltafan said:
Source ?
Click to expand...
Here,

Switzerland did signal that follow-on orders for the F-35 may be considered later, once funding and political support allow. It has already pledged to raise defence spending to 1% of GDP by 2032, still well below NATO’s 2% benchmark but a notable shift for a traditionally cautious nation.
Click to expand...
 
"Followon orders may be considered later". They have only committed to buying as many aircraft as possible within the original funding envelope.
 
WatcherZero said:
"Followon orders may be considered later". They have only committed to buying as many aircraft as possible within the original funding envelope.
Click to expand...
From the article they have stated a need for a larger fleet.
Defence Minister Martin Pfister acknowledged that Switzerland “would require a larger fleet” to meet its stated air-defence requirements of 55 to 70 modern fighters, but said the government was constrained by the outcome of the referendum.
Click to expand...
Yes the current funding envelope constraints them but with an intent to increase the defence budget and a requirement for a larger fleet topping up on F-35 is likely. They could of course chose a different aircraft but that would bring significant more expense that the cost conscious Swiss are unlikely to pay for.
FighterJock said:
How much funding have the Swiss put aside for the F-35 order?
Click to expand...
From the article...

The Swiss government said on Friday it could no longer guarantee the purchase of 36 aircraft within the 6 billion-franc (about $6.6 billion) spending cap approved by voters in 2020.
Click to expand...
 
This is a very valid point that Gareth makes....its ok for the US as it has multiple manned platforms that can carry APKWS...

But for nations that have F-35 as their sole combat jet (i.e. a good chunk of Europe now, and increasing all the time) there is going to be some serious pressure on Lockheed Martin to get external rocket pods added and operational sharpish...Typhoon and Rafale are already on that path, and I suspect we'll see Gripen in due course....

Can LM react though? Deep as they are in TR-3 and Block IV hell?

I actually think most users would be happy if APKWS/external rocket pods were bumped up to No.1 on the integration list ahead of anything else...

https://twitter.com/x/status/2031810870183932191
View: https://x.com/GarethJennings3/status/2031810870183932191
 
timmymagic said:
This is a very valid point that Gareth makes....its ok for the US as it has multiple manned platforms that can carry APKWS...

But for nations that have F-35 as their sole combat jet (i.e. a good chunk of Europe now, and increasing all the time) there is going to be some serious pressure on Lockheed Martin to get external rocket pods added and operational sharpish...Typhoon and Rafale are already on that path, and I suspect we'll see Gripen in due course....

Can LM react though? Deep as they are in TR-3 and Block IV hell?

I actually think most users would be happy if APKWS/external rocket pods were bumped up to No.1 on the integration list ahead of anything else...

https://twitter.com/x/status/2031810870183932191
View: https://x.com/GarethJennings3/status/2031810870183932191
Click to expand...
It is a valid point but I think that ship has sailed. IMO the future of anti-drone isn't fighter based rockets but the fleet of low cost anti-drone interceptors Ukraine is deploying today. By the time F-35 received APKWS there may be enough anti-drone interceptors available to make the integration time and cost a waste.
 
Ozair said:
It is a valid point but I think that ship has sailed. IMO the future of anti-drone isn't fighter based rockets but the fleet of low cost anti-drone interceptors Ukraine is deploying today. By the time F-35 received APKWS there may be enough anti-drone interceptors available to make the integration time and cost a waste.
Click to expand...

Low cost drone interceptors will be part of the mix, but the ability to deal with higher speed drones and cruise missiles that are likely to be included in any barrage is still there. It's what the Russian's do...mix them up to saturate defences.
 
I think the key to counter-Shahed air defense is the airborne component. A large, subsonic platform like the MQ-25 could carry a powerful sensor, a large load of AGR-20s, and can loiter in a sector for a long time. Ground-based defenses are very manpower-intensive because the sensors and effectors have a shorter range. The Ukrainians can support that (and they don't have the ability to field large aircraft near the FLOC), but someone like Belgium can't. An effective aerial component would relegate ground-based defenses to the point defense role, which they are better suited for.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom