Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read
here.
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Early Aircraft Projects
Klemm E.63/64
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jemiba" data-source="post: 18582" data-attributes="member: 80"><p>Both were carrier-borne recce a/c, basically of the same layout, the </p><p>E 63 was a parasol wing design, the E 64 an alternative bi-plane.</p><p>Estimated data for the E 63: max. speed 310 km/h, landing speed</p><p>85 km/h, range 1000 km, TOW 2800 kg, a Jumo 10A or a BMW 116</p><p>engine was envisaged.</p><p>And the article mentiones, that Hanns Klemm disliked bi-plane and</p><p>military aircraft ....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jemiba, post: 18582, member: 80"] Both were carrier-borne recce a/c, basically of the same layout, the E 63 was a parasol wing design, the E 64 an alternative bi-plane. Estimated data for the E 63: max. speed 310 km/h, landing speed 85 km/h, range 1000 km, TOW 2800 kg, a Jumo 10A or a BMW 116 engine was envisaged. And the article mentiones, that Hanns Klemm disliked bi-plane and military aircraft .... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What year did the first man go to space? (answer has 4 numbers)
Post reply
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Early Aircraft Projects
Klemm E.63/64
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
