Ki-61-I KAI Tei - 30 mm Interceptor Variant

CherryBlossom

English Literature with Film Studies student
Joined
17 April 2014
Messages
78
Reaction score
5
I cannot seem to find anything on this variant and is only mentioned on Wikipedia. Obviously not the most reliable of sources.

I am away from home so don't have any access to my source material, but was wondering if anyone had any information on this variant? Is it experimental?

Look forward to replies

Thanks,

Cherry
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_10.png
    Screenshot_10.png
    55.2 KB · Views: 818
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Hi!
Ki-61-ⅠKo : 12.7mm gun(Ho-103)×2(fuselage), 7.7mm gun(Type 89)×2(Wing)
Ki-61-ⅠOtsu : 12.7mm gun×2(fuselage),12.7mm gun×2(Wing)
Ki-61-ⅠHei : 12.7mm gun×2(fuselage),20mm cannon(Mauser)×2(Wing)
Ki-61-ⅠTei : 12.7mm gun×2(wing),20mm cannon(HO-5)×2(fuselage)
  A few Ki-61-ⅠTei had 12.7mm gun×2(fuselage),30mm(Ho-155?) cannon×2(Wing).
Ki-61-Ⅱ : Engine Ha-140(1350hp nominal), Larger wing.Prototype of modified type.
  Ki-61-Ⅱwith 20mm cannon(HO-5)×2(fuselage),20mm cannon(HO-5)×2(Wing)type was planned.
Modified Ki-61-Ⅱ : Ki-61-Ⅱ with Ki-61-ⅠTei wing, Redesigned tail stabilizer, improved dive performance.
  A few later production model had a bubble canopy.

Source : FAMOUS AIRPLANES OF THE WORLD No.17 ARMY TYPE 3 FIGHTER "HIEN"

Bubble canopy model.
https://n-wing.sakura.ne.jp/secure/ProductDetail.php?iProduct=13
 

Attachments

  • oglftklf_600.jpg
    oglftklf_600.jpg
    127.7 KB · Views: 689
  • Kawasaki-Ki-61-II-Kai-56-Sentai-prototype-Itami-Osaka-Japan-May-1945-01.jpg
    Kawasaki-Ki-61-II-Kai-56-Sentai-prototype-Itami-Osaka-Japan-May-1945-01.jpg
    78.2 KB · Views: 655
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

I checked my Aircam Aviation series and found the following (see pic below). Please note - the Ho-105 mentioned is incorrect. The correct designation is Ho-155 for the army air force 30 mm cannon.
 

Attachments

  • Ki-61-Id.jpg
    Ki-61-Id.jpg
    130.2 KB · Views: 641
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Thanks.
FAMOUS AIRPLANES OF THE WORLD No.17 ARMY TYPE 3 FIGHTER "HIEN" had mistake(page 16). ;)

Kawasaki Heavy Industries restored Hien whcih exhibited in Chiran. Sorry for off topic.
http://car.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/1024728.html
 

Attachments

  • 01.jpg
    01.jpg
    189.1 KB · Views: 618
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Yes I know about that restoration. I actually liked it better in the previous camouflage and 244th Sentai markings. It looks too plain for a Japanese fighter! ;D
 
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Thank you for finding this information!

is there anything more known about this variant? Seems little is mentioned on it.
 
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Ummm......Very hard. :'(

Please take care that Ki-61-ⅠTei(丁) nose 20mm cannon front end diameter is large.
You can see Ki-61 with skin cooler in the No.5 drawing.

http://kwangaeto.egloos.com/6248897
 

Attachments

  • a0109941_498af532011b9.jpg
    a0109941_498af532011b9.jpg
    326.8 KB · Views: 245
  • a0109941_498af531905dd.gif
    a0109941_498af531905dd.gif
    71.2 KB · Views: 262
  • a0109941_498af53180242.gif
    a0109941_498af53180242.gif
    101.3 KB · Views: 237
  • Tei front view.gif
    Tei front view.gif
    35.2 KB · Views: 193
  • Tei plan view.gif
    Tei plan view.gif
    93.8 KB · Views: 192
  • a0109941_498af531c0fec.gif
    a0109941_498af531c0fec.gif
    50.3 KB · Views: 207
  • a0109941_498af531d218f.gif
    a0109941_498af531d218f.gif
    48 KB · Views: 204
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

Hi! Please try automatic translator.
http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/guns/ho155.html

The third picture shows Ki-84 Hayate with Ho-155 cannon?
http://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Ki-84/Nakajima-Ki-84.html
 

Attachments

  • Artwork-Nakajima-Ki-84-Hayate-Hei-technical-drawing-1_48-scale-0C.jpg
    Artwork-Nakajima-Ki-84-Hayate-Hei-technical-drawing-1_48-scale-0C.jpg
    306.8 KB · Views: 207
  • Artwork-Nakajima-Ki-84-Hayate-Hei-technical-drawing-1_48-scale-0A.jpg
    Artwork-Nakajima-Ki-84-Hayate-Hei-technical-drawing-1_48-scale-0A.jpg
    401.3 KB · Views: 219
  • ho155-3.jpg
    ho155-3.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 176
  • ho155-2.jpg
    ho155-2.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 150
  • ho155-1.jpg
    ho155-1.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 155
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

CherryBlossom said:
Thank you for finding this information!

is there anything more known about this variant? Seems little is mentioned on it.

Only that there were issues with the Ho-155. The drawings of the Ki-84-Ic (Hei) posted by Blackkite show a "Ho-155-II". Maybe that was an attempt to correct whatever problems they had with the original. I would search the web for info on that.
 
Re: Ki-61-I KAI Tei? 12.7mm & 30mm cannon interceptor variant?

So is the Ki-61 with 30 mm's a separate aircraft?

Does it have an official designation or is it just a Ki-61 Tei with field modification?
 
Ummm...........I can't find any answer about this question.
 
At this point it seems to be an a modification of an existing model, whether in the field or the factory. So the model is Ki-61-Id modified or Ki-61-I-KAId as Wikipedia says, KAI of course indicating modified. I would lean to this being a factory installation as the Ho-155 is quite large and I don't know if they could install it in the field, but that is just my opinion.
 
windswords said:
At this point it seems to be an a modification of an existing model, whether in the field or the factory. So the model is Ki-61-Id modified or Ki-61-I-KAId as Wikipedia says, KAI of course indicating modified. I would lean to this being a factory installation as the Ho-155 is quite large and I don't know if they could install it in the field, but that is just my opinion.

I understand, thanks for your input.

Is there a place where i can learn about the a,b,c,d vs ko, otsu, hei and tei in designating aircraft? Is the a.b.c.d system used by english sources?
 
Please try auto translation. It's difficult for me to explain. :'(
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B2

甲 こう (ko)
乙 おつ (otsu)
丙 へい (hei)
丁 てい (tei)
戊 ぼ (bo)
己 き (ki)
庚 こう (ko)
辛 しん (shin)
壬 じん (jin)
癸 き (ki)
 
The Japanese terms Ko, Otsu, Hei etc. loosely translate into first, second, third etc. in English. This is what I was told so I could be wrong.

Because we (English speakers) use Roman numerals for the major model numbers (ex. Ki-43 Model 2 is Ki-43-II) using a number to indicate Otsu looks confusing (Ki-43-II2), so a letter is used instead (Ki-43-IIb). None of this is official. The Ki-43-IIb is the Type 1 fighter Model 2 Ostu, but it's a lot quicker for us English speakers to say Ki-43-IIb.

This only applies to army aircraft. The navy used an entirely different system.
 
Hi!
In the later stages, at the request of the Army, it was changed to a teardrop-type windshield to improve the pilot's visibility. This procedure was carried out with reference to Nakajima's Type 4 fighter, but unlike Nakajima, who had used a teardrop-type windshield since the Type 97 fighter, Kawasaki had a shallow accumulation of technology and could not properly glue the fuselage to the windshield, so the pilots were troubled by noise.
Conventional fastback windshields are referred to as type 2 ko (Ki 61-II modified ko), and those with teardrop type windshields are referred to as type 2 otsu (ki 61-II modified otsu), or conventional fastback type windshields are called type 2 and those with teardrop type windshields are called type 3 (Ki 61-III), but both are only unofficial names given to later generations.
 

Attachments

  • Ki-61 variation.jpg
    Ki-61 variation.jpg
    934.7 KB · Views: 62
  • Ki-61-1.jpg
    Ki-61-1.jpg
    756.3 KB · Views: 61
  • modified Ki-61-1.jpg
    modified Ki-61-1.jpg
    822.7 KB · Views: 55
  • Ki-61-2.jpg
    Ki-61-2.jpg
    883.6 KB · Views: 56
  • modified Ki-61-2.jpg
    modified Ki-61-2.jpg
    859.7 KB · Views: 81
Last edited:
Hi!
In the later stages, at the request of the Army, it was changed to a teardrop-type windshield to improve the pilot's visibility. This procedure was carried out with reference to Nakajima's Type 4 fighter, but unlike Nakajima, who had used a teardrop-type windshield since the Type 97 fighter, Kawasaki had a shallow accumulation of technology and could not properly glue the fuselage to the windshield, so the pilots were troubled by noise.
Conventional fastback windshields are referred to as type 2 ko (Ki 61-II modified ko), and those with teardrop type windshields are referred to as type 2 otsu (ki 61-II modified otsu), or conventional fastback type windshields are called type 2 and those with teardrop type windshields are called type 3 (Ki 61-III), but both are only unofficial names given to later generations.
Thank you so much blackkite-san, I always loved the Ki-61, so similiar to the Italian fighters of that era.
 
The Ki-61-II was planned from around April 1942, and the engine was replaced with a modified Ha-140 (1,400 hp) of the Ha-40, the wing was redesigned to accommodate a 20 mm Ho-5 cannon, and the wing area was increased to 22 m2 by lengthening the chord. In addition, the vertical stabilizer was slightly increased, and the fuselage was extended by 42 cm. According to Mr. Doi, consideration was also given to ensuring the function and facilitating maintenance. It was armed with four Ho-5 20 mm cannons or two Ho-5 20 mm cannons and two 12.7 mm Ho-103 machine guns. It was planned to aim for a maximum speed of 640 km/h and a ceiling of 13,500 m. In addition, the installation of a 30 mm cannon Ho-155 was also considered. According to Mr. Watanabe, the Ki-61 and Ki-61-II look very similar from a distance, but when you get closer, they are so different that it is difficult to find the same part.
The prototype of the Ki-61-II was completed in August 1943 and made its first flight, but its practical use was delayed due to frequent engine failures, especially water pumps. Eight prototypes were produced between September 1943 and January 1944, but their air combat performance was not very good, and the eighth aircraft was not completed until January 1944, but it was not until June that the engine air tests began, and the project was finally abandoned. In line with the increase in engine output, the length of the radiator tube has been increased from 250 mm to 300 mm, and the cooling power has been increased by 20%. Depending on the armament, the conventional type 20 mm cannon with two 12.7 mm machine guns is sometimes called Type 2 Ko (Ki-61-II Ko), and the one with four 20 mm cannons is called Type 2 Otsu (Ki-61-IIOtsu), but it is only an unofficial name given to later generations.
 
The Type 2 (Ki-61-II Kai) was planned around February 1944. The main wing of the Ki-61-II was reverted to that of the Ki-61-1 Tei, and the wing armament was also returned to the same as that of the Type 1 Tei. The reason for adopting a large main wing and the

The reason for reverting it is not well understood, as there is no documentation. The conventional wing could not be equipped with a 20 mm cannon Ho5 due to size problems, but there are various theories as to the possibility that a new main wing was prepared for the installation of it.

According to Mr. Akimoto, it was simply decided that it would be better to put the Ha 140 on the Type 1 TEI and renovate each part.

According to Mr. Ikari, the flight performance of the large main wing was poor, and it was reverted to the original one in order to improve speed.

According to Mr. Komine, this is to improve flight performance.

According to Mr. Watanabe, this is because the effect of increasing the size of the main wing was not seen much.

The total weight of the equipment increased by 355 kg. However, the speed was improved to 610 km/h at an altitude of 6,000 m and 591 km/h at an altitude of 8,000 m. The Type 1 belonging to the 244th Squadron, which was on the rise, was sometimes overtaken by the Type 2 that started later. Armament is the same as that of the Type 1 TEI, but the number of rounds in the nose of the 20 mm cannon Ho-5 has been increased from 120 to 200 rounds each. In order to balance the nose extension, the wings were shifted forward by 8 cm compared to the first type. The bulletproof capacity of the fuel tanks has also been enhanced, so the total number of in-wing tanks has been reduced from 265 to 210 liters. Powered by a Ha-140 engine, the aircraft was different from its predecessor in that it could easily climb to an altitude of 10,000 m even when fully armed. The Type 2 aircraft was operated ahead of the first-line units by the Flight Experiment Department of the Aviation Examination Department, and by the Kawasaki Air Defense Fighter Squadron, which was formed from around November 1944 and was composed of test pilots of Kawasaki Aircraft under the command of Chief Kataoka Shosaburo.
 
The Air Inspection Department and the Kawasaki Air Defense Fighter Squadron played an active role in intercepting B-29s, and the Kawasaki Air Defense Fighter Squadron in particular reported the destruction of a total of three or four B-29s and B-25s on December 13, 1944 and January 3, 1945, together with the Type 1 aircraft, and received a letter of appreciation from the Chief of the Air Headquarters. Of these, three B-29s were the result of the battle by Chief Kataoka.

After 30 or 36 additional prototypes were produced, mass production began in September 1944 as the Ki-61-II Kai. Although the Ha-140 was mass-produced smoothly and it was possible for the aircraft to show high performance if it exhibited the desired performance, although 374 aircraft were completed, the production of the Ha-140 was delayed and the quality was poor. Production was 8 units of 20 units scheduled for delivery in July 1944, 5 units of 40 units scheduled for delivery in August, and only 1 unit was completed in September. Under these production conditions, it was extremely difficult to use this machine as a practical machine. Captain Tomoo Natori, who was in charge of the Aviation Inspection Department, went to the Akashi plant in Kawasaki, where the Ha-140 was produced, to investigate the defect, but it was impossible to maintain the performance, and as a mechanic, he could not say that he would fly on it. However, the Ha-140, which passed the inspection, had no problems and was evaluated as being able to fly at an altitude of 10,000 m. However, the number of Ha-140 failures was still high, and production of the Ki-61-II Kai was cut off after about 100 aircraft. The Type 2 was planned to be deployed only to air defense units in the interior of the country with good maintenance conditions. Incidentally, the formalization of the Type 2 was not long after the decision was made to discontinue production.
 
- Japan acquired the manufacturing license of the German Daimler-Benz DB 601 engine in 1938. In 1940 the IJA assigned the production to the Akashi plant of the Kawasaki firm, under the name Ha-40. The engine was to be used to propel the Ki.60 and Ki.61 future fighters as well as a fast bomber commissioned by the IJN to Yokosuka.

The Ki.60 was built by the standards of the new fighters used in Europe, but it was not satisfactory to the Japanese pilots due to its low manoeuvrability, excessive wing load and high landing speed. These features were removed from the next design Ki.61, including many aerodynamic solutions already tested in the Heinkel He 100, as well as a larger wing surface and a lighter armament of four machine guns.

The Ki.61 began operations with the 68th and 78th Sentais in New Guinea, in May 1944. The tropical climate and poor maintenance conditions affected the delicate engines and the general availability of the aircraft. Many were immobilized on the ground and destroyed by the strafing attacks of the American P-38s. The Tony proved to be superior to the P-39s and P-40s in air combat, although these airplanes were difficult to shoot down using machine guns only, due to its robust airframe, armoured cockpit and self-sealing fuel tanks.

Even more difficult was fighting strongly armed heavy bombers B-17s and B-24s, leading to the IJA to order the construction of the Ki.61-I-Otsu version, equipped with 20 mm cannons and two droppable fuel tanks of 200 litres or two bombs of 250 kg hanging under the wings. The IJA had no access to the Oerlikon cannons used by the IJN Zeros and was forced to buy 800 Mauser MG 151 cannons of 20 mm to Germany that were carried by submarine to Japan in August 1943. The special ammunition for the MG 151 was also imported and could not be renewed.

At the end of the year the Ho-5 cannon built in Japan was already available. Its installation on the wings of the new Ki.61-I-KAI-Hei fighters started immediately, but the weapons proved insufficient against the B-29 bombers. Some aircraft of this series were experimentally provided with Ho-155 cannons of 30 mm that proved too heavy to quickly reach the altitude of the enemy planes.

Despite the encountered difficulties, the Ki.61 achieved some successes. On December 3, 1944, the B-29 42-24656 was shot down over Tokyo by a Tony of the 244th Sentai piloted by Cap. Teruhiko Kobayashi. On January 3, 1945, a B-29 of the 73rd BW was shot down over Nagoya by an airplane of the 55th Sentai piloted by 2Lt. Takeo Adachi. On the 23rd, the 42-24785 of the 882nd BS was destroyed over the Mitsubishi-Hamamatsu factory by a Ki.61. On the 27th, during a raid on the Nakajima-Tokyo factory, the ‘Haley's Comet’ 42-24616 and ‘Shady Lady’ 42-24619 were shot down by two Tonys of the 244th Sentai piloted by Cap. Teruhiko Kobayashi and Sgt. Chuichi Ichikawa.

On March 13, the 42-24754 of the 878th BS was shot down by the Ki.61 of the W.O. Tadao Sumi, of the 56th Sentai over Osaka. On November 7, 1944, the IJA ordered the formation of Tai-Atari units, specialized in ramming attacks, within each Sentai of air defence. The Ki.61-I-KAI-Hei of the 56th and 244th Sentais were stripped of armament and all possible weight for its use as rammers.

On December 3, 1944, the bombers of the 498th BG carried out a new raid against the Nakajima-Tokyo manufacturing plant. During the attack, the B-29 42-24680 was rammed by the Ki.61 of Lt. Toru Shinomiya and the 42-24735 by the airplane of Cpl Matsumi Nakano, both of the 244th Sentai. However, the ‘Long Distance’ 42-24544 could make it to base, although badly damaged, after being rammed on engine No. 3 by a Ki.61-I-Hei, also of the 244th Sentai, piloted by Cpl Masao Itagaki.

On the 27th of the same month, the B-29 ‘Uncle Tom's Cabin no. 2’ of the 498th BG was rammed over Tokyo by an airplane of the 244th Sentai piloted by Takeo Yoshida. On January 3, another two bombers of the 871st BS were rammed by Tonys over Nagoya, the ‘Joker's Wild’ 42-24626 by an airplane of the 56th Sentai, piloted by Toshio Wakui, and ‘The Leading Lady’ 42-24766 by a fighter of the 55th Sentai, flown by Minoru Shirota. On the 9th of the same month, the 42-24655, a B-29 of the 871st BS, was rammed over Tokyo by a Ki.61 of the 56th Sentai piloted by Toshiro Wakui. On December 27 and in the same area, ‘The Jumping Stud’ 42-24767 was rammed by the plane of Shirobe Tanaka and the ’Ghastly Goose’ 42-63541 by Ando Kiyoshi, both of the 244th Sentai.

On February 19, during a new raid conducted by the 882nd BS over Tokyo, the B-29 42-63494 was rammed by a Ki.61 over Sendagaya Shiboya-Ku. On March 16, a Tony of the 56th Sentai, piloted by Juichi Ogata, rammed the B-29 42-24849 of the 500th BG. On April 7, the 883rd BS again attacked the Nakajima-Tokyo factory, losing the ‘Adam's Eve’ 42-24600 and the ‘Mrs. Tittymouse’ 42-65212 after being rammed by two Ki.61s of the 244th Sentai piloted by Takashi Kawano and Satohide Kohatsu.

On June 26, the B-29 44-69873, 42-24769, 42-24616, 42-63423, 42-63501 and 42-24682 were shot down over Osaka by ramming attacks by Ki.61 airplanes of the 56th Sentai piloted by Sgt. Yukata Nakagawa, Cap. Teruhiko Kobayashi, 2Lt. Shoichi Takayama, 2Lt. Katsuki Hattori, Sgt. Masao Itagaki and Sgt. Matsuyoshi Nakano.

From autumn 1944, ten Sentais equipped with the Hei version participated in the Battle of Philippines performing escort missions to the kamikaze groups, as well as fighter and bomber attacks and US air base strafing. All aircraft and most of the pilots were lost against the air superiority of the enemy.

Sentais 1st, 17th, 59th and 105th were rebuilt in southern Japan returning to fight in Okinawa, where the Tonys acted as escort fighters with two droppable fuel tanks of 200 litres. From March 1945 they began to carry out Tokko missions equipped with one Type 99, No. 25, Model I bomb of 248.7 kg suspended under the starboard wing and a fuel tank under the port wing. On April 3, two Ki.61 of the 105th Sentai severely damaged the landing craft LST-599 in a suicide attack to the SW of Cape Zampa. Three days later, the destroyer USS Emmons (DMS-22) was sunk off Okinawa by two Ki.61s of an unknown Tokko unit.

On May 1, the British carrier HMS Victorious was damaged by two suicide Ki.61s of the 23rd Independent Chutai off Kadena. Two days later, the destroyer USS Luce (DD-522) was sunk after an attack by two Ki.61s of the 17th Sentai off Kerama Retto. On the next day, the escort carrier USS Shangamon (CVE-26) was rammed by a Ki.61 of the 105th Sentai off Kerama Retto and the landing craft LSM (R) -190 by another Tony of the 19th Sentai to the south of Miyako Jima.

Between March 26 and June 11, 1945, no fewer than 106 Tonys made Tokko attacks against Allied ships in Okinawa, Kadena, Naha, Kerama, Miyako-Jima, Cape Zampa, Nakagusuku Bay and Taiwan. They came from the Akeno and Hitachi Flying Schools, from training units of the 4th and 5th Army Air Forces and from the 17th, 19th, 59th and 105th Sentais. They were organized into suicidal units Shinbu Nos. 54, 55, 56, 110, 149, 159 and 160 and into the 23rd Independent Chutai.

The numerous problems experienced with the Ha-40 engine were due mainly to the weak construction of the cylinder block, improperly designed to make it lighter than the heavy Daimler-Benz. Failures also occurred in the operation due to dust and sand from the landing strips and from the poor maintenance conditions in tropical climates. The engineers redesigned the engine as Ha-140 that was somewhat more reliable, being used to propel the Ki.61-II-KAI from April 1944. Despite its excellent performance in tests, only 374 airframes were made and when the Akashi factory was destroyed in a bombing on January 19, only 99 Ha-140s were completed, just enough to equip four Sentais.

The situation forced the Kawasaki engineers to consider installing a new Mitsubishi Type 4 Ha-112-II radial engine of 1,500 hp. To achieve its integration into the airframe of a Tony, they conducted a study of the only Focke Wulf Fw190 fighter existing in Japan to analyse how the Germans had solved the problem. Surprisingly and as happened with the Mustang, changing the engine produced an excellent fighter with greater manoeuvrability and climb rate that was also easier to maintain. Named Ki.100-I Type 5, it was used by six Sentais of elite, fighting on equal terms against Hellcats and Corsairs in Okinawa and against Mustangs over Japan.

The best combat altitude for Type 5 was 6,000 m but it was almost useless against the Superfortress at 9,000 m. Some aircraft of the 111th Sentai, assigned to the defence of Osaka, removed the machine guns to save weight, but the head-on attacks carried only with two guns of 20 mm were not destructive enough to achieve results against a B-29 and some aircraft of the Sentai were experimentally fitted with air-to-air Ro.San Dan rockets of 10 cm.

During the night from April 14 to 15, 1945, the B-29s of the 313rd and 314th BW conducted a medium altitude attack against the Kawasaki factory losing eleven aircraft (42-24821, 42-63545, 42-93893, 42-93962 , 42-94034, 44-69673, 44-69834, 44-69871, 44-69882, 44-69907 and 42-24664) one of them rammed by a Ki.100 of the 244th Sentai piloted by Cpt. Chuichi Ichikawa.
 

Attachments

  • 009.jpg
    009.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 74
  • Squad081.jpg
    Squad081.jpg
    893.8 KB · Views: 75
  • 010.jpg
    010.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 65
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom