Hwasong-16B IRBM

A new rather interesting hybrid design for the launcher
GKMVYzRXMAA70ot.jpg:large

6bb733ea-a5f7-4571-983e-5147ac8abad0_f77f3141.jpg

A clam-shell for the glider and a cold launch tube for the missile,thats one I`ve not seen before.
GKMGD7_bsAARcWo

Only a 7 axle TEL
598305.jpeg

Elevation
GKNNWDbbkAArWhL

O6U6U6SE3BMADCHOYTBDQZC2LY.jpg

a12689c7-4f5b-455c-bcdc-c1e8d0e95bae_w1023_r1_st_s.jpg

Launch...
https://www.kpvi.com/news/national_news/north-korea-says-it-test-fired-new-solid-fuel-hypersonic-missile/article_5aa5b2ad-0972-51ec-bc54-9717ce304d1f.html
 
Last edited:
Some numbers:


KCNA said the Hwasong-16B flew for about 1,000km (621 miles), reaching a peak altitude of 101km (62 miles). Seoul’s military said it was airborne for about 600km (370 miles) before splashing down in the sea between South Korea and Japan.

So presumably 400km boost phase and 600km glide?

 
Last edited:
When North Korea has a better hypersonics program than you. (One wonders if Lil' Kim lit the fuse himself.)
 
A big change from all the parade props they've been showing the past years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, the booster itself is solid-fuel and does not need much protection from elements. Hypersonic glider, on the other hand, needed such protection.

The glide vehicle is covered in nice, ionizing ablative that degrades with exposure to cold and moisture.
 
Kim Jong-un supervises the launch of a new hypersonic missile in North Korea

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d7enU-Gzu4


Apr 3, 2024 #politics #northkorea #KRT
North Korea successfully test-fired a new mid-to long-range solid-fuel, hypersonic missile, state-run television KRT said on Wednesday (April 3).

KRT released a video of state's leader Kim Jong Un overseeing the launch, and lauding it as a strategic weapon that demonstrates the "absolute superiority" of North Korea's defense technology.

With this, North Korea has "fully turned all tactical, operational, and strategic-grade missiles of different ranges into solid-fuel, with warhead control, and capable of nuclearisation," Kim said, according to state media.
 
Bmpd's take on the Hwasong-16B:
 
second generation designs, prior to the design of B61.

B40 and B60 look like non-standard designations, I'm not aware of such bomb units, there is the W40 which was a 10KT version of the Python primary used in the MGM-18 Lacross SRBM and CIM-10 BOMARC long-range SAM while the W60 was the proposed warhead for the USN's cancelled Typhoon LR SAM.
 
Last edited:
B40 and B60 look like non-standard designations, I'm not aware of such a bomb units, there is the W40 which was a 10KT version of the Python primary used in the MGM-18 Across SRBM and CIM-10 BOMARC long-range SAM while the W60 was the proposed warhead for the USN's cancelled Typhoon LR SAM.
I wasn't aware of them being used at all. I was meaning a nuke in the same design generation as B43 and up through B57.
 
I was meaning a nuke in the same design generation as B43 and up through B57.

Aside from the B43 and B57 the only other ones I can think of are the B27 and B28, Both of which were tested in Operation Redwing with the TX-28 tested four times - shots Erie (14.9KT test of TX-28C Python primary), Seminole (13.7KT test of TX-28S Python primary), Flathead (365KT, 73% fission yield TX-28S) and Dakota (1.1MT test of TX-28C). While the XW-27 was tested in shot Apache (1.85MT, Zither secondary, mostly fission yield) in a modified Regulus I nose-section, it used the same Viper II primary as the B39 (A derivative of the first-generation B15).

The B43 and B57 both used the Tsetse primary.
 
Wikipedia has a list of North Korea ballistic missiles - for what it's worth.


Rather speculative estimates are given in the following table:

MissileTypeRangeQuantityComments
Hwasal-1Cruise missileIn testing.
Hwasal-2Cruise missile1800 km~2000 kmIn testing.
Hwasong-5 (Scud-B)SRBM340 km30+ launchers
Hwasong-6 (Scud-C)SRBM500 km
Hwasong-7
(Nodong mod 1/mod 2)
MRBM900–1,500 km10 launchers (est.)
Hwasong-8
Hwasong-8 mod 1
SRBM1+ launchersIn testing
Hwasong-11A (KN-23)SRBM240~800 km17+ launchersSimilar to 9K720 Iskander or Hyunmoo-2, tested in August 2017.
In 2019, tests of the missile were conducted on 4 and 9 May, July 25 and 6 August. First launched from a railcar 16 September 2021.
Hwasong-11B (KN-24)SRBM410 km9+ launchersSome similarities to MGM-140 ATACMS, but larger, with aft-fins to maintain aerodynamic control over entire flight.
Tested in August 2019 and March 2020
Hwasong-11C
(KN-23 mod 1)
SRBM6+ launchersIn testing.
Hwasong-11S
(KN-23 mod 2)
SRBM"Some" launchersIn testing.
Hwasong-12
Hwasong-12 mod 1
IRBM5000–6000 km10+ launchersIn testing.
Hwasong-14
KN-20
ICBM10,000+ kmSuccessfully tested on 4 July 2017
Hwasong-15
KN-22
ICBM13,000 kmSuccessfully tested on 28 November 2017
Hwasong-16bICBM600-650 kmSuccessfully tested on 2 April 2024.
A solid-fuel ICBM in North Korean missile arsenal.
Hwasong-17
KN-28
ICBM>13,000 kmSuccessfully tested on 24 March 2022
Hwasong-18ICBMSuccessfully tested on 13 April 2023
First solid-fuel ICBM in North Korean missile arsenal
KN-18SRBM450+ kmScud-C variant that carries a Maneuverable reentry vehicle.
Tested May 2017.
KN-21SRBM250+ kmScud-B/Hwasong-5 variant with maneuvering capabilities.
Tested April 2017.
KN-25SRBM/MLRS380 km"Super-large multiple rocket launcher," viewed as an SRBM by U.S. assessment. 30 tracked chassis and another 9 truck chassis are known to have been made for total of 216 guided rockets.
Pukguksong-2 KN-15MRBM1200 kmOperational and deployed to northern border in missile bases where Hwasong-7 is deployed.
Scud-ERMRBM1,000 km"Some" launchersRecently upgraded with new guidance and electronics.

Estimated maximum range of some North Korean missile types in 2013. The missiles with a range exceeding that of the Rodong are not known to be operationally deployed.

 
Is it efficient to produce that many different types?
Beat me to it ! I thought the same, at least about their ICBMs. They have a monster, hypergolic missile and immediately thereafter they go solid-fuel. I know, "Titan II and Minuteman " but still.
 
Is it efficient to produce that many different types?
Not in the least, except in terms of figuring out what you do want to make in numbers.

Either it's a bunch of ideas of "Three Fats", or it's a bunch of different groups all competing for development funding.


Beat me to it ! I thought the same, at least about their ICBMs. They have a monster, hypergolic missile and immediately thereafter they go solid-fuel. I know, "Titan II and Minuteman " but still.
Solid fuels are a lot easier to store and maintain by conscripts, so that shift makes sense to me.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom