Hawker Supersonic V/STOL - HS.1205 to P.1216

[blackkite]

Acoustic vibration.
http://www.vibrationdata.com/rocket.htm
http://shiken.jaxa.jp/en/facility7_e.html

 

[red admiral]

I suppose the two front nozzles works like the Harrier's Pegasus.
While the back nozzle works like on the F-35B ? :

Similar. 2 rotating bearings rather than 3.

 

[blackkite]

Hi!
https://aviation.stackovernet.com/cn/q/6100

 

[blackkite]

Hi! P.1216-13.　

 

[blackkite]

Hi! P.1214-3
https://ukx-dev.fandom.com/wiki/BAe_P1214-3
"In order to resolve the pitch control problems with the P1205-11, BAe were able to raise the engine and centre of thrust by removing the rear of the fuselage and creating a twin boom aircraft. Initial studies resulted in the evolution of the P1205-11 into the P1212, however the forward swept wing P1214 made a much more striking and maneuverable aircraft.

The P1214-3 never got further than an interesting study, with the RAF’s AST.403 battlefield air-to-air evolving with normally swept wings into the P1216."

http://prototypes.free.fr/p1127/p1127-13.htm

P.1212.
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/attachments/p1212-12a-jpg.177708/

 

[Scott Kenny]

Hi! 1214.
Hard to imagine how three exhaust nozzles work. Some hint in the last drawing?
http://www.scalemodelnews.com/2017/12/3d-printed-what-if-hawker-p1214-from.htmlhttps://books.google.co.jp/books?id...olls royce COMPANY BROCHURE ON V/STOL&f=false

https://twitter.com/x/status/937700929473732608

Forward nozzles had a single bearing, based on art shown in this thread, at a 45deg angle to aircraft centerline. Doesn't look like the center nozzle is long enough for a 3-bearing, so it's probably just a 2 bearing which is less efficient.

 

[overscan (PaulMM)]

Screencaps from Ralph Hooper presentation at Weybridge, 1992.

 

[fightingirish]

Source from @Mike Pryce :
https://www.twz.com/air/the-hidden-history-of-americas-harrier-jump-jets

 

[flateric]

From https://forum.warthunder.com/t/bae-p-1216-the-last-great-british-stovl/73548