Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read
here.
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Army Projects
gyrojet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shaba" data-source="post: 141415" data-attributes="member: 1137"><blockquote><p>The whole idea seems like more trouble then it could ever be worth though. Making an exploding round for Gyrojet would be complicated because of among other things you have no sudden impulse to arm the projectile, which will make fuse design much harder. Meanwhile what would be the point of a small caliber payload carrying round? Very small projectiles are highly inefficient and expensive for that role because of fusing issues and generally small payload weight, while by the time you hit existing 40mm grenade launchers employing the high pressure-low pressure system, they are already partially rocket launchers in effect. The propellant charge turns the projectile into a short lived rocket. Its hard to see what advantage Gyrojet would ever have while retaining acceptable accuracy, which was always a problem with the Gyrojet guns in the first place. Having a rocket burn outside of a gun barrel is never going to work that great.</p></blockquote><p>link works fine for me . here is another link with the same content and more <a href="http://gigconceptsinc.com/Rocket-Index-1a1a.html">http://gigconceptsinc.com/Rocket-Index-1a1a.html</a> the deathwind people claimed to have liked the accuracy problem by useing a puller moter instead of apusher but idont see anyone beating apath to thier door.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shaba, post: 141415, member: 1137"] [quote]The whole idea seems like more trouble then it could ever be worth though. Making an exploding round for Gyrojet would be complicated because of among other things you have no sudden impulse to arm the projectile, which will make fuse design much harder. Meanwhile what would be the point of a small caliber payload carrying round? Very small projectiles are highly inefficient and expensive for that role because of fusing issues and generally small payload weight, while by the time you hit existing 40mm grenade launchers employing the high pressure-low pressure system, they are already partially rocket launchers in effect. The propellant charge turns the projectile into a short lived rocket. Its hard to see what advantage Gyrojet would ever have while retaining acceptable accuracy, which was always a problem with the Gyrojet guns in the first place. Having a rocket burn outside of a gun barrel is never going to work that great. [/quote]link works fine for me . here is another link with the same content and more [url=http://gigconceptsinc.com/Rocket-Index-1a1a.html]http://gigconceptsinc.com/Rocket-Index-1a1a.html[/url] the deathwind people claimed to have liked the accuracy problem by useing a puller moter instead of apusher but idont see anyone beating apath to thier door. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What year was Concorde's first flight? (answer has 4 numbers)
Post reply
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Army Projects
gyrojet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top