Grushin « Sh-Tandem » or « Tandem-MAI »

Dear Justo, I see nothing and it is written "If You want share profiles of this aircraft with our visitors - mail to webmaster"... Have you done it?
 
Actually getting to the profiles is a bit tricky,
I've marked, where to click with red circles . ;)
 

Attachments

  • Grafik2.JPG
    Grafik2.JPG
    162.8 KB · Views: 804
  • Grafik1.JPG
    Grafik1.JPG
    149.8 KB · Views: 753
Thanks Jemiba, I've seen the 3 of them.
Interesting Shturmoviks with tandem wings, 1937. Very Delanne-like.
Edit: I have checked in the Docavia bool "Les Chtormoviks" and there are 2 pages, photographs and drawings about this family, pages 118-119.
 
Pics of the Grushin "Sh-Tandem" (an old Russian book also describes it as the MAI-3):
 

Attachments

  • Grushin Sh-MAI or Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Grushin Sh-MAI or Sh-Tandem.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 626
  • MAI-3.jpg
    MAI-3.jpg
    400.3 KB · Views: 617
  • 1241203472_snap1.jpg
    1241203472_snap1.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 626
  • MAI-Tandem.jpg
    MAI-Tandem.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 357
Two clean three-view arrangements of the Tandem-MAI (as it was also called):
 

Attachments

  • Tandem-MAI two-tone three-view.jpg
    Tandem-MAI two-tone three-view.jpg
    366.4 KB · Views: 134
  • Tandem-MAI three-view.gif
    Tandem-MAI three-view.gif
    215.3 KB · Views: 120
From Samolyete Strane Sovietov 1917-1970:
 

Attachments

  • Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Sh-Tandem.jpg
    409 KB · Views: 87
An original company model and a color profile of the Sh-Tandem:
 

Attachments

  • Sh-Tandem model.jpg
    Sh-Tandem model.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 71
  • Grushin Sh-Tandem.jpg
    Grushin Sh-Tandem.jpg
    165.7 KB · Views: 88
dabbler said:
Empannage evaluation
thanks, Andrew, tell me how accurate the dimensional data of this aircraft. I mean the wingspan of the main wing in all sources (Shavrov, Rastrenin ...........) is equal to - 11 m against 9,8 m (according to the latest data of the article in M-Hobby №178)
 

Attachments

  • Clip_11.jpg
    Clip_11.jpg
    64.7 KB · Views: 59
This drawing was not published by M-H. I think Shavrov, RastreninPerov
used not original reports, but some kind of secondary reference. They together
confused first flight date.
 

Attachments

  • 01.jpg
    01.jpg
    93.9 KB · Views: 77
dabbler said:
This drawing was not published by M-H. I think Shavrov, RastreninPerov
used not original reports, but some kind of secondary reference. They together
confused first flight date.

Amazing,thanks.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom