• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Fairchild C-123 folding wings

Antonio

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,524
Reaction score
278
That's really interesting. Thanks a lot Justo. Its role was COD only or could it be configured as a tanker?.
 

Justo Miranda

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
4,608
Reaction score
2,854
Website
www.amazon.com
pometablava said:
That's really interesting. Thanks a lot Justo. Its role was COD only or could it be configured as a tanker?.

Some (cut) text here
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    226 KB · Views: 677

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
290
The C-123's inherent heavy weight and huge tailfin seems an odd choice for a carrier-operating aircraft IMO.
I'm curious and somewhat confused, as to why the deck-spotting picture's show so many a C-123's at one time on the carrier deck, if it was intended as a COD/Tanker; or am I reading this post incorrectly? Was these C-123 meant to replenish the carrier in mass, without the carrier needing to dock? or was it possibly intended that this many C-123 would operate from the carrier to deliver assault troop's??

Regards
Pioneer
 

RLBH

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
371
Reaction score
231
Was these C-123 meant to replenish the carrier in mass, without the carrier needing to dock?
'Regular or emergency replenishment of supplies', apparently. Though I'm really not sure why you'd bother.
 

taildragger

You can count on me - I won a contest
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
317
Reaction score
190
The C-123's inherent heavy weight and huge tailfin seems an odd choice for a carrier-operating aircraft IMO.
I'm curious and somewhat confused, as to why the deck-spotting picture's show so many a C-123's at one time on the carrier deck, if it was intended as a COD/Tanker; or am I reading this post incorrectly? Was these C-123 meant to replenish the carrier in mass, without the carrier needing to dock? or was it possibly intended that this many C-123 would operate from the carrier to deliver assault troop's??

Regards
Pioneer
I don't think resupplying a carrier entirely by COD aircraft would be feasible. A USN carrier with embarked air wing has about 5000 sailors and 90 aircraft aboard - the number of aircraft and sorties required to support them and operations would so occupy the flight deck that the ship's operational capacity would be seriously diminished. Significant resupply of a carrier without docking is accomplished by underway replenishment (UnRep) from another vessel steaming alongside. Cargo and personell are passed passed back and forth on cables and helicopters while fuel is transfered by large hoses.
 
Last edited:

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
3,095
Reaction score
681
Website
beyondthesprues.com
A USN carrier with embarked air wing has about 5000 sailors and 90 aircraft aboard

Though in the era this was proposed you had carriers with far less. That said, I doubt they were proposing enmasse replenishment. Rather I think it is just showing how many could fit on.

That said, using them for something like an airborne assault with paratroopers could be an interesting scenario.
 

Hood

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
2,061
Reaction score
1,571
An interesting concept. The RAF looked at using carriers as staging posts for DHC Caribou's for the East of Suez resupply role but this takes it one step further with a dedicated COD role.
I guess it was intended for rapid resupply of aviation stocks (ammunition etc.) to maintain high tempo air strikes etc. without having to pull the carrier back out of station to transfer stock from a resupply ship, especially if the carrier had plenty of fuel and no other reason to disengage. I guess Fairchild was looking at Korean War experience and using that to take a punt and try and sell C-123s to the Navy. Had this been a few years earlier maybe the USN would have taken a nibble at the offer?
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
290
An interesting concept. The RAF looked at using carriers as staging posts for DHC Caribou's for the East of Suez resupply role but this takes it one step further with a dedicated COD role.

How interesting - both the RAF using Caribou's, and using carrier's as staging posts!!


Regards
Pioneer
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
290
A USN carrier with embarked air wing has about 5000 sailors and 90 aircraft aboard

Though in the era this was proposed you had carriers with far less. That said, I doubt they were proposing enmasse replenishment. Rather I think it is just showing how many could fit on.

That said, using them for something like an airborne assault with paratroopers could be an interesting scenario.

Thanks Greg!

"That said, using them for something like an airborne assault with paratroopers could be an interesting scenario."
Hmm, maybe you could apply this "scenario" somewhere else


Regards
Pioneer
 

riggerrob

I really should change my personal text
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
1,288
Reaction score
684
yes, the USMC toyed with the idea of massed para-drops during the Cold War. Eventually the USMC limited para-drops to small groups of Force Recon, Forward Air Controllers and Naval Gunnery Controllers.
 

BlackBat242

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
The C-123's inherent heavy weight and huge tailfin seems an odd choice for a carrier-operating aircraft IMO.
I'm curious and somewhat confused, as to why the deck-spotting picture's show so many a C-123's at one time on the carrier deck, if it was intended as a COD/Tanker; or am I reading this post incorrectly? Was these C-123 meant to replenish the carrier in mass, without the carrier needing to dock? or was it possibly intended that this many C-123 would operate from the carrier to deliver assault troop's??

Regards
Pioneer
The text of the image in the 3rd post say that "up to 12 could be accommodated on an Essex class carrier while its warplanes are on a mission".

It also describes what the aircraft was for, and how it would be used.

The tailfin is a non-issue... as the AJ Savage and A-3 Skywarrior, which both operated from Essex class carriers, had tall tailfins that folded for moving to the hangar... just like was proposed for the C-123 COD.

The A-5 Vigilante and the S-3 Viking likewise had large tailfins that folded.
 
Top