Drones in near midair collisions with planes at major U.S airports an increasing danger

Halcyon66

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
9 July 2022
Messages
1,176
Reaction score
2,647


Regards,
 
Civil aviation has its enemies. I would not put it past them to use drones to harass jetliners.
 
Last edited:
'IF' the footage shown in the news with regard the 'Copenhagen drone' is 'real' and actually shows the aircraft in question, it seems to be reasonably big in span and have a full navigation lights suite fitted !

View: https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1970327776281645264


I'm wondering if it may be a bit more closer to home than the eponymous 'Russia', (if so, cue a bit of back peddling and the story quietly disappear having done its job ?)

Coincidentally and in unrelated news, the first Belgian MQ-9B SkyGuardian was presented to the Press at Florennes Air Base on the same day :)
 
Last edited:
'IF' the footage shown in the news with regard the 'Copenhagen drone' is 'real' and actually shows the aircraft in question, it seems to be reasonably big in span and have a full navigation lights suite fitted !
[...]
I'm wondering if it may be a bit more closer to home than the eponymous 'Russia', (if so, cue a bit of back peddling and the story quietly disappear having done its job ?)
Navigation lights: I would guess the point is they are meant to be seen.
Not much of a disappearing story yet.
New report in:
Denmark's Aalborg airport in the country's north has been closed after unauthorised drones were seen in its airspace, according to local authorities.

Three other smaller airports in the country's southern region - Esbjerg, Sønderborg and Skrydstrup - also reported drone activity, but were not closed.

The incident comes after the country's Copenhagen airport was forced to close earlier this week due to a drone incursion
 
From the BBC story:
Kjeld Jensen, from the drone centre at the University of South Denmark, accepts it is embarrassing that Denmark's vulnerabilities have been laid bare - but he believes the police and military acted appropriately.
"I wouldn't shoot down the drones if they are over an urban area or an airport," he says, "as they have to come down, and there'd be other fuel or batteries creating a fire, which is also a risk you have to take into account."
"You need to decide whether it's more dangerous than letting it fly around," says Peter Viggo Jakobsen, of the Royal Danish Defence College. "But it's not a sustainable situation and we need to come up with ideas."
Denmark's cautious approach is markedly different from Poland's since Russia's drone incursions there on 10 September.
This week, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski warned Moscow at the UN: "If another missile or plane crosses our territory without permission, intentionally or by accident, and is shot down and its wreckage falls on Nato territory, do not come here to complain. You have been warned."
[...]
What Denmark and many of its neighbours lack is the kind of tools they need to bring down the drones.
The government recently announced plans for an "integrated layered air defence", along with investment in long-range precision weapons to hit enemy territory.
But that's of little use for Denmark's defences right now.
"From an engineering perspective it's so much easier to build a drone that can fly than to build something that can keep them from flying," Jensen, from the University of South Denmark, points out.
On Friday, Denmark will join several Nato allies and Ukraine to discuss the idea of erecting a "drone wall", proposed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to protect the EU's eastern borders.
The drones they will be discussing are more likely to focus on the kind of armed weapons that reached Polish airspace rather than the unarmed drones with bright lights seen over Denmark.
The aim is to create an early detection system, although again that may not have helped Denmark overnight if drones spotted over Jutland were launched locally.
 
From Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant, translated:
Why aren't the drones simply shot down?

The Danish military decided against this on Wednesday, based on a "global assessment" and with the safety of the population in mind, Danish General Michael Hyldgaard said during a press conference on Thursday.

Shooting down drones is, however, easier said than done. Not only is it a challenge to hit the small, fast-flying drones in the dark, but using bullets or grenades poses significant safety risks. Moreover, if you shoot down a drone, debris will fall down, and you don't know where it will land.

Nevertheless, the Danish government wants to make it easier to shoot down drones. Minister Hummelgaard pointed out that a bill is being drafted that would make it legal for the management of airports and other critical infrastructure to disable drones. The proposal is in response to previous drone disruptions, earlier this year, at a Danish port and at Copenhagen Airport.
 

Denmark has banned all civilian drone flights this week ahead of a European Union summit in Copenhagen, the country's transport minister said on Sunday.

The ministry said the decision was made in order to "simplify security work" for the police, and they could not accept "foreign drones creating uncertainty and disruption".

Denmark is one of several European countries that have reported "drone incidents" in recent weeks, with unidentified drones sighted above Danish military sites as recently as Saturday.

[snip]
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom