ILikeTanks
ACCESS: Confidential
- Joined
- 16 January 2023
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 47
What's that?Shipgirl ahoy!
What's that?Shipgirl ahoy!
Moose Morgan, resident of some mountain range. He a long ways up there, probably had to hoof it.What's that?
Yep! You only need to remove rear 6-inch turrets, to have a lot of free space, and pretty far away from bow-mounted heavy guns (which is important for sensitive electronic)Neat thing with putting all the guns in two forward quad-turrets: the entire back of the ship is available for modifications. No need to ditch turrets and fill the holes with some ballast to re-equilibrate the hull.
15-inch guns; Richelieu-class were armed with 380-mm cannons.Tartar plus helicopters plus 8 x 16 inch guns: hell of a ship, really. Is there a hangar for the helicopters ? how many of them can it carry ?
Heh, she got a big hull to accomodate them) The flight deck is the same length as on Jeanne D'Arc, but about 50% wider - and being a battleship, she is much more stable as carrier platform.Shiiit you're right about guns. I hate imperial units. 381 mm, 406 mm. Whatever. Bigre, that's a lot of helicopters. And the Super Frelon was the biggest of the lot. Pumas were smaller so more of them would fit. And yeah, a ton of Gazelles, each one with plenty of firepower.
A bit) Not sure about Harrier's, but some VTOL is possible)How about Harriers ? and this question brings me to another one: I presume this is inspired by the hybrid Iowas, with a rear mounted Harrier & helicopter flight deck ? and we are back to forward mounted quad turrets being a much better bargain...
This reminds me of the Japanese Ise-class hybrid battleships. But the ship in this picture looks too narrow, more like a cruiser
Alas, the Gemini is working with associations and analogues)This reminds me of the Japanese Ise-class hybrid battleships. But the ship in this picture looks too narrow, more like a cruiser![]()