Can You ID those Three Aircraft ?

[hesham]

From Nasa report; Modelling Flight,

I can't ID those three aircraft,may the far left was a Convair design ?.

 

[The K2]

From Nasa report; Modelling Flight,

I can't ID those three aircraft,may the far left was a Convair design ?.

The first one looks like a Boeing concept for a flying wing bomber, the second one the Curtis-Wright Ascender.

 

[flateric]

2). XP-55

 

[The K2]

The third model looks like an air-to-surface missile. A variation of the Gargoyle?

 

[iverson]

These might not have been actual designs as such. They could have been configuration models used only for basic research.

 

[southwestforests]

Upper right plan view, above the Vought XF5U, looks to me very much like it could be the Curtiss XP-55.

References:

Curtiss XP-55-CS Ascender

Single-seat, experimental fighter; pusher engine, main wing near the tail and canard elevator surface at nose.Not long before America declared war on the Japanese in 1941, the U. S. Army Air Corps sponsored three radical and unorthodox fighter aircraft designs.

airandspace.si.edu

Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender - Destination's Journey

Photographs of the Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender, an unconventional fighter prototype developed for the US Army Air Corps. 3 prototypes built

www.destinationsjourney.com

 

[Stargazer]

Upper right plan view, above the Vought XF5U, looks to me very much like it could be the Curtiss XP-55.

Or the Lockheed L-133-5, which was basically similar.

 

[Mark Nankivil]

The third model looks like an air-to-surface missile. A variation of the Gargoyle?

Reminds me of a Delanne design... https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/postwar-delanne-projects.1166/
Otherwise, the ASM-N-2 BAT glide bomb - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-N-2_Bat#/media/File:BAT-PB4Y-wingbat.jpg

Enjoy the Day! Mark