Bomarc fans will appreciate this.

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,198
Reaction score
2,737
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRhpjTj36A0

DVD to come. Also shows X-10 in flight.

http://www.rocket.aero/
 
L

Lee

Guest
According to this site, another chat blog, featuring about halfway down this page:

http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/hypersonic-cruise-for-the-v-prize/

The Bomarc they discuss disintegrated at Mach 6 after passing Mach 5.5 at 40,000 ft.---and it was still accelerating.

Those particular ramjets were said to be designed for only Mach 3.5. Maybe kind of embarrassing to both engineers and top military brass at the time?
 

mz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
676
Reaction score
16
The Mach 5 missile was the much later 1980 Martin Marietta ASALM, not the fifties Boeing Bomarc. The Marquardt engined (similar to Bomarc's engines) Lockheed X-7 test missile reached Mach 4.5 in the fifties in a test flight. It was an air launched missile.

I think mixup between Bomarc and ASALM.

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/asalm.html
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-10.html
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-60.html


Someone with good info on Bomarc can of course say what the maximum speeds attained were...
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
6,102
Reaction score
4,522
According to le Fana de l'aviation of June 2001 top speed was around mach 3.45, not much (well it's already impressive!)

X-7 mach 4.31

ASALM mach 5.5 is mentionned in Andre Parsh website (designation systems)
 
L

Lee

Guest
"...X-7 mach 4.31..."

You're right. The experimental missile went that fast in a flight test with a really good-sized engine.




"ASALM mach 5.5 is mentioned in Andre Parsh website (designation systems)"

Below is a large .PDf that goes into some of the history of ramjets. But you're also right. ASALM was something different than BOMARC. There is actually conflicting information on the Internet(nothing new), but that other information said the BOMARC went that fast using good engines, but not great big engine on a massive missile like that.

Here's the .PDF:
194 pp. and 6.92 megabytes


http://amelia.db.erau.edu/nasacds/200712Disc1/research/20070035924_2007036871.pdf
 

Boxman

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
314
Reaction score
156
This Boeing produced film ("Supersonic Guardian") about the BOMARC was just posted by the San Diego Air & Space Museum on YouTube two days ago. The film features BOMARC launches, a brief explanation of ths SAGE system, and some great B-17 target drone footage of inert warhead BOMARC's passing within striking distance. Also, as in the earlier posted clip, some X-10 footage as well (4 min. 50 sec. mark).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIStR5LF7pw
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
491
Thanks, OBB... once again, you da man!.......




cheers,
Robin.
 

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
16,001
Reaction score
5,585
It's easy when he has his cats doing all his spying for him:

Dsc_7081-tinkered-300x245.jpg


Dsc_7055-tinkered-1024x680.jpg


Perhaps we should start calling OBB, 'Warlock'? ;)
 

Sea Skimmer

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
394
Reaction score
51
Has anyone ever found diagrams of what the original clamshell door launcher shown in the video looked like on the inside? I’ve found diagrams in manuals for the Model II/III/IV launchers actually used for the combat bases, but never the original test launcher which was ultimately rejected as too expensive but supposedly possessed considerably greater resistance to atomic blast.
 

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
16,001
Reaction score
5,585
Via an article linked to in a MilitaryPhotos.net thread:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=06drBN8nlWg
 

Similar threads

Top