Were HVAR and RP-3 rocket usable in air to air combat against bomber?

Ronny

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
19 July 2019
Messages
1,581
Reaction score
1,864
During late WW II, R4M rocket increased the lethality of German Me-262 by over 3 times even when facing off against enemy with numerical superiority
2.png R4M rocket.png

On the other side, HVAR and RP-3 rocket on Allied fighter only seem to be used in A2G. Why is that so?.
Mustang-A68-648-HVAR-rockets.jpg
 
The RP-3 was developed from the Unrotated Projectile British rocket engineering program that had focussed on their use as anti-aircraft weapons. However the RP-3 rockets were relatively slow (and relatively large) compared to earlier UP rocket designs, making them relatively unsuited for air-to-air use.

The HVAR was developed into the FFAR and used in the post-war period as the primary weapon of many interceptor aircraft.

The lack of use of rockets as air-to-air weapons in WWII can be attributed to two factors:

1) In the later parts of the war, German bombers switched to night attack roles, rather than use in massed daylight formations. Allied fighters ceased to primarily function as interceptors and instead were use primarily to escort bombers and engage in ground attack. There simply wasn't a role for interceptor rockets, and they weren't useful as a weapon for escort fighters, but did have a role in ground attack.

2) Rockets were inaccurate, requiring large volleys against large targets to be effective. The Germans were firing on massed formations of four engined bombers... there was no similar target for the Allies. In the post war period rockets remained inaccurate but the use of radar gunsights and the increase in the size of interceptors (allowing more rockets to be carried), made them a potentially effective weapon against larger Soviet bombers.

A final note: The Soviet Union mass produced air-to-air rockets for use by interceptors. However, being fired in volleys of only two to eight projectiles, their inaccuracy meant that relatively few air-to-air kills were scored, and they were quickly transitioned into a ground attack role and a surface-to-surface role (the first Soviet rocket artillery systems were using designs originally produced for air-to-air use).
 
During late WW II, R4M rocket increased the lethality of German Me-262 by over 3 times even when facing off against enemy with numerical superiority
View attachment 786581View attachment 786582

On the other side, HVAR and RP-3 rocket on Allied fighter only seem to be used in A2G. Why is that so?.
View attachment 786583

The R4M was built for air-to-air use: small, carried in large numbers and fired in predictable salvos, which made it effective against bomber formations. HVAR and RP-3 were heavier, had bigger warheads and ballistics tuned for ground attack, so they weren’t practical against fast aircraft. In short: possible in theory, but their design made them far better suited to A2G than A2A.
 
Back
Top Bottom