Now they have done it, USAF has declassified our NGAD demonstrator, you know China will now mass-produce this advanced platform. We have to keep the lid on this critical technology. But I don't know what Iran is doing, they developed the 6th gen Cargo Fighter, by Hasbro!
All I can say is Aye, Aye, Aye....
They have no chances to defend anyway, so they defend only by flag and the color of grey hull.
www.twz.com
Lets say these things are real and it is not just for show. (Therefore ignoring the adhesive tapes and the “No Push” rudder hinges)
Can we stop attacking my posts at every chance? Please practice being respectful.Can we come back to reality?? "Iran's aircraft carrier, Iran's stealth fighter!" .... come on, we do not need to post any random stupid click-bait YT-video that just too eagerly picked up this nonsense and claimed it to be real!
Yes, we saw some 60% UAVs on deck of a converted tanker, we saw some tiny RC-models taking off from it but this does not make this vessel and aircraft carrier nor these UAVs an operational UCAV!
Really? Are we in the Kindergarden??
With all due respect we`ve seen footage of the ababil 3 both taking off and landing from the ship,the ababil 3 is a ucav and there is footage of it both carrying and launching weapons to back this up.Can we come back to reality?? "Iran's aircraft carrier, Iran's stealth fighter!" .... come on, we do not need to post any random stupid click-bait YT-video that just too eagerly picked up this nonsense and claimed it to be real!
Yes, we saw some 60% UAVs on deck of a converted tanker, we saw some tiny RC-models taking off from it but this does not make this vessel and aircraft carrier nor these UAVs an operational UCAV!
Really? Are we in the Kindergarden??
Defences are present,somewhat minimal perhaps but certainly there.
If Ababil is real, it's not apparent why qaher isn't. Iranian PR set kinda unrealistic propaganda bar for themselves, but if we set a realistic one, there isn't all that much.
The first time (the fake Chinese stealth bomber clip) was a mistake and I am sorry for that. The India thing (except for the E variant for the Felon) ended up being true, and with this current situation I simply posted a video I thought was interesting. I didn't do it to force any claim; I merely posted a video I found that gave some information. Believe me, I am very critical of Iran over the countries human rights record and supporting of more violent regimes, but I still wanted to post a video that was informative. Honestly, saying it is fifth gen as advertised is more neutral than trying to critique it. I think in the era of battling media outlets with different narratives I like to post things as they are presented by other countries. We can post things on this message board then debate that true authenticity in a way that isn't hurtful to anyone.
See my list of differences here: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...hter-jet-and-drone-versions.18332/post-753937 Though I missed the shifted nose gear position.
Interestingly I`ve noticed that there appears to be some obvious differences between the 60% scale Q-313 UCAVs.
The one at the top of the picture has a very different nose profile compared to the other 2,which look to have been shortened with better blending of the canopy.The intake design also looks slightly different as well.
One of the most obvious is the difference in design of the landing gear struts and the repositioning of the front gear in the other 2 examples,one can see that the gear looks to be roughly positioned towards the back of the duct in front of the intake,whereas with the top example the gear looks to be positioned much closer to the front of the duct.
Perhaps the top one is the prototype with the other 2 examples being the pre-production models?.
Excellent work with your list,I`m sorry I missed that but in all honesty for the most part I`ve avoided this topic as I was just expecting the usual bullshit and frankly I couldnt really be bothered wading through it,so I was pleasantly surprised with some of the content that I did find.
The F-35 was the last fifth generation fighter designed by the United States, after that comes the generational leap to the sixth generation F-47.
To be honest, matching IAF so far away from home shouldn't even be that much of a task.
Well in terms of quality yeah it shouldn't, with the SU-35s on order (48) it could help improve air defense assuming they have good networking capability, problem is the F-35s
I looked at it not so much as technical task, but on conditions level.
Tied down with 2x or maybe 4x ratchet-straps, not chains.
The wings are pretty thick, it would be able to carry a decent fuel load in the wings.
