Register here

Author Topic: Antonov An-88  (Read 5760 times)

Offline boxkite

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 781
Antonov An-88
« on: October 28, 2007, 08:06:38 am »
Do any drawings or illustrations exist of the projected Antonov An-88 derivative of the An-71?

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 10751
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2007, 08:43:26 am »
Only the verbal description in Lotnictwo Wojskowe Rosji; An-72 with phased array antennas on each side of the fuselage.

"They can't see our arses for dust."
 
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline Apophenia

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 2040
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2007, 03:05:13 pm »
Is the An-88 the same thing as the Izdeliye 88 / An-72R? According to FlankerMan on the Key Publishing Forum, a photo of the An-72R was published in AFM, November 2004

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=33858

BTW, Deino was also on that forum. Might he have kept a copy of the An-72R image??

Edit: An-72R from Spyflight --  http://www.spyflight.co.uk/an72.htm
« Last Edit: October 28, 2007, 03:10:46 pm by Apophenia »

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 10751
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2007, 12:21:28 am »
There seem to be two stories about An-72R/An-88, one being that it was an AWACS project, one that it was some kind of recce machine with SLAR.

It seems unlikely to be SLAR if, as suggested, the radar panels are on both sides of the fuselage - as a standoff SLAR recce aircraft you would only want the radar on one side.

However, An-72R would seem to indicate a recce role.
"They can't see our arses for dust."
 
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline Meteorit

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 427
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2007, 04:03:13 am »
Here's another An-72R picture:

Offline Deino

  • Our China Correspondent
  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 2430
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2007, 01:42:37 pm »
...
BTW, Deino was also on that forum. Might he have kept a copy of the An-72R image??
...

Hmmm ... I saved three pictures ... the one Meteorit posted in the post before mine and these two ...

Hope it helps, Deino
He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last forever; I was wrong.
...
For nothing now can ever come to any good.
-------------------------------------------------
W.H.Auden (1945)

Offline flateric

  • Deputy Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 8535
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2007, 02:16:37 pm »
Posted by Anonymous at Aviaforum.Ru
http://aviaforum.ru/printthread.php?s=57a52418ff14d508e939299e63a9421e&t=2037
An-72R has a Reg No.783573 [it carried unusual 6-digit registration, only used by several various type a/c of Antonov OKB in 1981-88 timeframe] and its buy No. №36572083573 is not matching reg No in the case. 83573 is a No. out of Kharkov Aircraft Factory (KhAZ) registration numbers row, and sources may be wrong. And it could be 35th An-72 in order built, and planned serial aircraft designation was planned as An-73 (while An-88 or 'airplane '88' designation is known as well). There was one more An-72R, BTW, but its Reg. No is unknown. Flight testing year was 1987.
"There are many disbelievers in
stealth, more than a few of them truly technically ignorant and proud of it." Sherm Mullin, Skunk Works

Offline flateric

  • Deputy Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 8535
Re: Antonov An-88
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2007, 12:01:44 pm »
An-72BR (aka An-72R aka 'aircraft '88')
Never was called 'An-88'
R = Retranslator aircraft, would act in team with An-71. No recon functions as it turns out...
« Last Edit: November 07, 2007, 12:07:08 pm by flateric »
"There are many disbelievers in
stealth, more than a few of them truly technically ignorant and proud of it." Sherm Mullin, Skunk Works