Register here

Author Topic: Mach 3+ Powerplant.  (Read 4502 times)

Offline RobertWL

  • CLEARANCE: Confidential
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Mach 3+ Powerplant.
« on: January 27, 2007, 10:44:25 pm »
I've been reading this forum for a couple weeks now, and I must say I've really enjoyed all of it. And now I was wondering if some people smarter then me might be able to answer a few questions. I've been toying with a story of mine on and off for years, and when I hope to introduce a 'scratch design' aircraft, I try to make the design as realistic as possible. Recently I began considering a Mach 4+ Reconnaissance and/or Strike Platform. Somewhat of a cross between a SR-71 replacement and Lockheeds Mach 4 future strike platform they recentled showed a few images on. I understand quite a bit about Aircraft design and such, but I'm curious as to what sort of proplusion system a aircraft of that class would use.

I've been over the engine choices for concepts and aircraft built during the Cold War ((IE: XB-70, SR-71, F-108 etc.)) but I've  been able to find little information related to present technology, I'm sure a lot of its classifed but there should be enough basic knowledge to help get me where I want to be. I've seen the YJ102R Turbjet jet designed by the Rolls-Royce Liberty works, which is rather fasinating.. yet i've only found two articles on it sadly. I know that turbofans were problematic at higher mach numbers due to the high temperatures but I read somewhere that with more advanced materials it'd be possible to build turbofan engines that'd be able to cope with the stress. So, what would be the best option? A modern turbo-ramjet design? Something like the YJ102R? Or maybe even specially built turbofan engines?  I'm really curious as to what something like Lockeeds proposed..  http://www.janes.com/defence/air_forces/news/jdw/jdw030605_1_n.shtml might feature as far as a powerplant, again I know there is little hard information but speculation is always appreciated.

I figured after researching for weeks, months I'd find the answer I was looking for, Or I could run it by some of the people here. If you can help, I'd appreciate it, if not? I still apprecaite it.

Thanks Kindly.

Offline Archibald

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 2093
Re: Mach 3+ Powerplant.
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2007, 02:33:08 am »
I'm fascinated by Reusable Launch Vehicles and their engines. I've made a website on the subject (my error was I wrote in French! :'()
http://starmaks.populus.ch/

To cruise between below mach 3, you have a wide variety of engines... all fall on the TBCC category 

TBCC mean "Turbin based combined cycle". These engines are all based on air breathing engine and fans.
RBCCs are based of Rocket...

No way of using a turbofan at such speed : the fan just can't resist to the high speed airflow...
First solution is improving the J-58. I vaguely remember that NASA had a program for a mach 4+ engine of this kind (sadly I didn't downloaded the article at the time).
you have to mask the fan at high speed, and use the afterbuner section as a ramjet. Air enter the engine by special intakes, avoiding the fan (bypass).


There's another engine, the supercharged ejector ramjet or SERJ. Marquardt studied the engine in the late 60's for the X-15

http://www.google.fr/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GFRC_frFR205FR206&q=Marquardt+Supercharged%2dejector%2dramjet

In brief, TBCC include all combinations between turbofan and ramjet...

Hope this help !!!


Conservatoire de l'Air et de l'Espace d'Aquitaine
http://www.caea.info/en/plan.php

Profanity: weaker mind trying to speak forcefully

Political correctness: just bury your head in the sand for the sake of appeasement and "peace for our time"
- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serge_Dassault#Affaires_

Offline RobertWL

  • CLEARANCE: Confidential
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: Mach 3+ Powerplant.
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2007, 03:33:32 pm »
Actually, that helps confirm what I already had in mind. lol I know that some believed the J-58 was capable of Mach 4 but the A-12 Airframe was the limiting factor. Those links you provided are truly fasinating though. I do appreciate it. :)

Now I can plot a bit more!  ;D

Offline sferrin

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 11153
Re: Mach 3+ Powerplant.
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2007, 04:58:20 pm »
you also might try a guy who goes by the name "turboshaft" on the Key Publishing forum.  I'm fairly certain he's actually involved in the YJ102 program in one way or another and he may be able to give you some help.  (Obviously he couldn't tell you EVERYTHING but I'm sure he knows what is/isn't public I'd think  ;)
"DARPA Hard"  It ain't what it use to be.