ar020

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
8 January 2025
Messages
86
Reaction score
337
Retired Navy Cmdr. David Fravor was commander of the F/A-18F squadron on the USS Nimitz when he says he spotted the object during a flight off the coast of Southern California on Nov. 14, 2004.

In a 2021 interview with "60 Minutes," Fravor, a graduate of the Top Gun naval flight school, also spoke about what he saw.
He and Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich were training with the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group about 100 miles southwest of San Diego, Favor told "60 Minutes." At the time, advanced radar on a ship that was a part of their training group, the USS Princeton, detected what operators called "multiple anomalous aerial vehicles" over the horizon, descending 80,000 feet in less than a second. Fravor and Dietrich diverted to investigate.

"I said, 'Dude, do you, do you see that thing down there?' And we saw this little white Tic Tac-looking object. And it's just kind of moving above the whitewater area," Fravor told "60 Minutes." During the training exercise, Fravor and Dietrich each had a weapons system officer in the back seat of their F/A-18F. "There was four of us in the airplanes literally watching this thing for roughly about five minutes," Fravor said in his 2021 interview.

Fravor went in for a closer look. He described the "Tic Tac" object mirroring his movements, saying "it was aware we were there."
The object was about the size of Fravor's F/A-18F, with no markings, no wings and no exhaust plumes, he said. When Fravor tried to cut off the UAP, it accelerated so quickly that it seemed to disappear. He said it was detected roughly 60 miles away less than a minute later.

"I think what we experienced was, like I said, well beyond the material science and the capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently or that we're going to have in the next 10 to 20 years," Fravor testified Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee's national security subcommittee.
The Nimitz Tic Tac incident is one of the strongest modern UAP cases because it leaves the public with enough real material to ask disciplined questions.
There is a military context. There is named witness testimony. There is officially released video. There is later congressional attention. That already puts the case in a different category from rumour-led UFO stories. At the same time, the public record remains incomplete. The case is best understood as a serious modern UAP encounter with unresolved elements, not as a solved mystery or confirmed extraterrestrial event.
That balance is what makes the Nimitz incident worth reading carefully.
 

Attachments

  • Cmd-David-Fravor-USS-Navy-772x1024.jpg
    Cmd-David-Fravor-USS-Navy-772x1024.jpg
    121 KB · Views: 37
  • Tictac_13.png
    Tictac_13.png
    4.6 MB · Views: 29
  • Tictac_092.png
    Tictac_092.png
    5.9 MB · Views: 32
  • Tictac_022b.png
    Tictac_022b.png
    3.8 MB · Views: 33
  • Tictac_16bd.png
    Tictac_16bd.png
    3.3 MB · Views: 32
  • Tictac_14Cb.png
    Tictac_14Cb.png
    4.7 MB · Views: 30
  • Tictac_11l.png
    Tictac_11l.png
    5.9 MB · Views: 31
  • Tictac_10b.png
    Tictac_10b.png
    5.5 MB · Views: 30
  • Tictac_08j.png
    Tictac_08j.png
    4.1 MB · Views: 28
  • Tictac_07b.png
    Tictac_07b.png
    5.3 MB · Views: 28
  • Tictac_06b.png
    Tictac_06b.png
    5.3 MB · Views: 35
  • Tictac_05b.png
    Tictac_05b.png
    5 MB · Views: 35
  • 24v.png
    24v.png
    5.1 MB · Views: 38
  • 22e2.png
    22e2.png
    3.9 MB · Views: 31
  • 21seasdd.png
    21seasdd.png
    4 MB · Views: 32
  • 21sea(1).png
    21sea(1).png
    7.4 MB · Views: 33
  • 20.png
    20.png
    5.6 MB · Views: 38
  • 19x.png
    19x.png
    4.9 MB · Views: 39
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a military context. There is named witness testimony. There is officially released video. There is later congressional attention. That already puts the case in a different category from rumour-led UFO stories. At the same time, the public record remains incomplete. The case is best understood as a serious modern UAP encounter with unresolved elements, not as a solved mystery or confirmed extraterrestrial event.
That balance is what makes the Nimitz incident worth reading carefully.
The most plausible explanation is that "UFO" was some kind of experimental balloon, launched from submerged submarine. USN toyed with recon balloons in 1950s, it was pretty possible that there were some ideas later. "Mirroring the plane movement" sounds basically like "balloon dragged into plane's stream".
 
The most plausible explanation is that "UFO" was some kind of experimental balloon, launched from submerged submarine. USN toyed with recon balloons in 1950s, it was pretty possible that there were some ideas later. "Mirroring the plane movement" sounds basically like "balloon dragged into plane's stream".
All -

A " balloon " using the technology and propulsion we understand balloons to have in 2026... would not have been able to reposition so fast as to seem to disappear.
To cover approx 60 miles in 60 seconds = 1 mile-per-second = 5,280 feet per second.


With regards,
357Mag
 
A " balloon " using the technology and propulsion we understand balloons to have in 2026... would not have been able to reposition so fast as to seem to disappear.
"Seems to" is a keyword. Most likely, it was a different balloon. Submarine launched several; balloons by themselves were nearly transparent to radar, but some part of payload worked as corner reflector. When balloon turned such that reflector was pointing at radar, it appeared on screen. When balloon turned other way, it disappeared. Simple.
 
Breaking news! Tic-tac UFO was firstly seen in early XX century, taking off from Russian Imperial Navy armored cruiser "Rossyia"!

Proof:
 

Attachments

  • nlo-tik-tak-07.jpg
    nlo-tik-tak-07.jpg
    76.9 KB · Views: 23
Last edited by a moderator:
To reconstruct the situation:

1) The "UFO"'s were detected for several days by USS "Princeton" radar (not visually!) as groups of blips that moved in same direction, disappeared, reappeared, "jumped", quickly changed atltitude;

2) The F/A-18 observed one "UFO" near water surface, over the area of bubbling water. One pilot also reported "elongated object" underwater directly beneath "UFO";

3) After the F/A-18 flew near the "UFO", it started to "chase" the plane, wobbling and jumping behind it;

So the situation is rather obvious. A nuclear submarine (likely one of Navy's own) was performing some kind of experiment that involved launching balloons from submarine at periscope depth. Balloons were generally transparent to radar, but some part of their payload worked as corner reflector when angle was right; so when this part was at right angle they appeared on cruiser radar, and when it was not at right angle they disappeared from it. The sudden "jumps" of observed blips was likely caused by the same effect; operator was confused and took a newly detected blip as a disappeared one somehow jumping into new place.

When F/A-18 was investigating, submarine was launching another balloon, which was tethered near the water surface. A close flight of F/A-18 caused the tether to snap, and balloon was dragged by the plane turbulence trail. That's why it "chased" a plane - a light balloon was simply dragged by F/A-18 contrail for a while.

The target detected 60 miles aside was obviously a different balloon, likely launched earlier.

As you could all see - the explanation is simple, did not require any supernatural assumptions and perfectly explain everything in "Tic-tac UFO case"
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom